Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Flood plain.

  • 30-04-2013 10:44am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭


    I've recently made a planning application and one of the submissions claims that the site is subject to 1 in 100 year pluvial flooding.

    The objector has incorrectly based this on the OPW maps on myplan.ie.

    Based on this, they claim that the site is categorised as Flood Zone B and that permission should be refused.

    The truth is that the site is at no risk of flooding of any kind.
    Pluvial flooding appears to relate to rainfall so I can't say that would never ever happen but as far as I can tell Pluvial flooding does not put a site into a flood zone category.

    I've never dealt with this particular argument before and I'm kind of stumped as to how to clarify the matter.


Comments

  • Subscribers Posts: 42,171 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    loremolis wrote: »
    I've recently made a planning application and one of the submissions claims that the site is subject to 1 in 100 year pluvial flooding.

    The objector has incorrectly based this on the OPW maps on myplan.ie.

    Based on this, they claim that the site is categorised as Flood Zone B and that permission should be refused.

    The truth is that the site is at no risk of flooding of any kind.
    Pluvial flooding appears to relate to rainfall so I can't say that would never ever happen but as far as I can tell Pluvial flooding does not put a site into a flood zone category.

    I've never dealt with this particular argument before and I'm kind of stumped as to how to clarify the matter.

    a flood risk analysis, probably cost around 1200 - 1600

    talk to the planner and find out exactly what the concerns are. sometimes the concern may be the flooding of adjoining property or adjoining roads etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭loremolis


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    a flood risk analysis, probably cost around 1200 - 1600

    talk to the planner and find out exactly what the concerns are. sometimes the concern may be the flooding of adjoining property or adjoining roads etc.

    The planner had no concerns, I was simply asked to address the submission as it was written.

    Other than to say that the submission is nonsense as there is no risk of flooding I can't see a way to clarify it.

    I really don't want to spend money on a risk analysis just to prove that there is no risk when it is absolutely clear that there is none.

    It's akin to arguing that there is a flood risk on the side of a hill. It's obvious that there isn't but saying it's obvious isn't very technical.


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,171 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    If the planner has no concerns, and the have told you as much then good, thats one obstacle over.

    however this should be easy to clear up, wither it is in a flood risk area or its not. If its within a flood risk area then you will have to address the risk by analysis. If its not within a marked area then you need to show as much.

    you say that its 'absolutely clear'... you need to show that then by submission.

    i have direct experience with this as well in a current application. The council have concerns about flooding risk onto a nearby motorway and the only way i can show theres no risk is by flood risk analysis.

    Talk to the planner before any submission to see what they require, but like i said, if the area is not in a marked floor risk area then happy days, but if it is then you are going to need to prove otherwise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 159 ✭✭witty username


    Better flood data here:

    www.floodmap.ie

    Also, might be relevant:

    http://www.fingaleastmeathframs.ie/floodmapsconsultation.asp

    http://www.opw.ie/en/media/ICPSS_Phase%203_TechnicalReport_Final%5B1%5D.pdf

    (You can download all the ICPSS maps from OPW and the FRAMS maps from the FRAMS website)

    And if you're in DCC's area, you can ask them for the relevant extract from their SAFER maps which take account of existing flood alleviation measures around Dublin city.

    And have a read of this:

    http://www.flooding.ie/en/media/The%20Planning%20System%20and%20Flood%20Risk%20Management.PDF


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,902 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    loremolis wrote: »
    Other than to say that the submission is nonsense as there is no risk of flooding I can't see a way to clarify it.

    Simply explain why its nonsense.

    If pluvial flooding doesn't equal flood zone B. Show that.
    If the site isn't actually a pluvial flood risk, show that.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭loremolis


    Thanks to all for the information and assistance.

    I'm going with the it's nonsense response with a touch of; please check the maps that clearly don't refer to this site as lying within a flood risk area.


Advertisement