Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

SRAM 22

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭mossym


    what are teh advantages of a hydraulic groupset over electronic shifting, apart from the obvious one of dead battery? i guess it could be seen as more reliable, more akin to a mechanical system in that there isn't a lot to go wrong?

    can't see it being that much lighter, but could be wrong


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭AstraMonti


    A fluid system is more light than casing and the average steel cable. It will also never require any adjustment as there is no cable to stretch or anything like that. It might require a bleeding every year or so though. Also it will always provide the same constant force which won't be affected through turns or kinks on the cables. And that makes it ideal for TT/aero bikes with extremely tight bends on the cables.

    As for the hydraulic rim brakes, I don't see any benefit on them really, it will probably make them more bulky.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,223 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    An advantage of hydraulic brakes is (I think) that you modulate the braking force at more or less a constant lever position, because the fluid does not change length in the way that a cable system does.

    I'm not sure how this will feel on a conventional brifter, since lever travel is arguably an advantage when braking from the drops, but it opens up the possibility of new lever designs in future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,981 ✭✭✭Diarmuid


    A hydraulic shifting systems sounds like a terrible idea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,575 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    AstraMonti wrote: »
    As for the hydraulic rim brakes, I don't see any benefit on them really, it will probably make them more bulky.

    have magura hs33's on my mtb for donkeys years wouldnt go back

    no tired hands from braking on long descents and better modulation

    shifting though nah.....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,833 ✭✭✭niceonetom


    Hydraulic shifting is already out there for MTB.



    All those cables would put me off.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭mossym


    seems a weird shifting system as well, not sure i'd like that flying downhill on a bit of tough singletrack


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 430 ✭✭Craig06


    Were Garmin not using hydraulic brakes on Milan-San Remo recently? I think there was something mentioned about them


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭mossym


    hydraulic brakes are fine, makes sense, especially discs, have them on my mtb and love them, way more stopping power.

    i just can't get my head around the hydraulic shifting, although the routing argument put forward by AstraMonti makes a lot of sense


Advertisement