Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Santa Fe

  • 23-03-2013 6:04pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,126 ✭✭✭


    I cannot find anywhere the mpg of a 2.0 petrol 2 wheel drive Hyundai Santa Fe

    Are we the only country to have the 2.0 petr model???

    I've tried Parkers, Honest John, car emissions act but to no avail

    Im looking at a 03 for my fiancee and although i know there not light on petrol i don't want a tanker behind me either


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 212 ✭✭dbrunson


    Used to sell hyundai, the 2.0 petrol santa fe ave's around 20-23 mpg.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 759 ✭✭✭ltdslipdiff


    Try a search for a Kia Sportage of the same year? Same set-up if I'm not mistaken?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,575 ✭✭✭166man


    Dad had plenty of them albeit in diesel form on the fleet back in the day. None of them were ever economical as diesels as he used bring them home sometimes. I'd imagine the petrol one's were even worse, and gutless at that too.


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    166man wrote: »
    ............. I'd imagine the petrol one's were even worse...........

    Really?

    Petrol engine not as efficient as a diesel :eek:

    MoneyMan.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,575 ✭✭✭166man


    RoverJames wrote: »
    Really?

    Petrol engine not as efficient as a diesel :eek:

    MoneyMan.gif

    I left myself open for that one admittedly....:pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,865 ✭✭✭✭MuppetCheck


    Spirit monitor.de might be worth a look OP for real world figures...I'd look somewhere in the middle of those figures though. God knows there's plenty on there not being strictly honest.


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    166man wrote: »
    I left myself open for that one admittedly....:pac:

    Way, way back in 2001 I think it was I used deal with a chap who worked for a crane care company based in Dublin. He used to run his own car and get expenses off his employer. Anyway, he bought a new (ish) Santa Fe diesel, he used to carry nothing out of the way, a few tool boxes etc and he only kept the thing a month or two. He reckoned on the spin Dublin to Cork return he used barely average 30mpg.

    He replaced it with a Corolla van, don't know the figures but I imagine he lost a fair bit changing, although back than the Santa Fe was quite a popular van/commercial.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    If MPG is a concern why get an SUV?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,575 ✭✭✭166man


    RoverJames wrote: »
    Way, way back in 2001 I think it was I used deal with a chap who worked for a crane care company based in Dublin. He used to run his own car and get expenses off his employer. Anyway, he bought a new (ish) Santa Fe diesel, he used to carry nothing out of the way, a few tool boxes etc and he only kept the thing a month or two. He reckoned on the spin Dublin to Cork return he used barely average 30mpg.

    He replaced it with a Corolla van, don't know the figures but I imagine he lost a fair bit changing, although back than the Santa Fe was quite a popular van/commercial.

    Yep they went through the older and newer Santa Fe's, overall they were quite reliable and the model from 2006 onwards was a massive step up in quality and everything really but economical they weren't.

    Part of me wonders if it was down to the gearbox, they were only a five speed and doing the 120km\h up and down the motorway, she was fair high up the rev range. Great car for carrying stuff though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,126 ✭✭✭KwackerJack


    biko wrote: »
    If MPG is a concern why get an SUV?

    There not really an 'SUV' per say. A 2 wheel drive can't really be considered a utility. vehicle never mind sporty.

    Anyway my current car is averaging 30 mpg so anything around that is acceptable.

    If there only getting 23 mpg ill be better getting a porches boxer and leaving her with the volvo :-P


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,042 ✭✭✭Bpmull


    We struggled to get 30mpg out of our 2007 2.2 4wd auto Santa Fe diesel obviously :eek: the 2005 2.0 diesel done around the same manual though. Couldn't keep diesel in either. If say 23mpg would be the absolute best you'd see out of a petrol.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,126 ✭✭✭KwackerJack


    Bpmull wrote: »
    We struggled to get 30mpg out of our 2007 2.2 4wd auto Santa Fe diesel obviously :eek: the 2005 2.0 diesel done around the same manual though. Couldn't keep diesel in either. If say 23mpg would be the absolute best you'd see out of a petrol.


    I had A 98 Discovery 2.5 and I was getting better mileage than that :D

    Those CRDI engine's seem to be pretty thirsty


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭Saab Ed


    I drove to a wedding in Achill last year in my wife's Saab petrol. Cost us around 120 quid up and back and I didn't exactly go handy. A couple at our table had a Santa Fe petrol and they reakoned it had cost them nearly all of the eighty euros they put in the tank in Dublin just to get down.

    Horrific mpg. I wouldn't mind but they're not even powerful or quick. I had one as a company car years ago. I used to call the accelerator the noise induction pedal cause not much else happened when you pressed it. Lots of space and cheap as chips now but truly painful running costs . Oh and no car on the planet understeers as much.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,235 ✭✭✭✭Cee-Jay-Cee


    Have a look on www.cars-data.com


Advertisement