Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Seiko Jumbo review

  • 23-03-2013 2:38pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭


    Ok, as promised, here's a review of the Seiko 6138-3002, aka the "Jumbo"

    I haven't measured it myself but supposedly it's 45 mm left to right (incl. crown); 48 mm top to bottom and 38 mm dial diameter ... which in the 70's counted as mahoosive, hence its alias

    It's powered by the Seiko 6138 21600 bph movement with auto winder (also handwinds), crown wheel and vertical clutch

    246095.JPG

    The two registers show elapsed minutes 30/60 (bottom) and elapsed hours with markers for every half hour (top). The minute register steps forward every minute, the hour register hand doesn't step but moves continously. There is no small, continuously moving second hand, so with the chrono function off, seconds are not indicated.



    Day and date have a quickset function ...pull the crown out one step, turn it one way to change the day; the other to change he date.


    Here it is on it's period bracelet. The bracelet is not the one originally meant for this watch, but it is of the same shape and size = thin and narrow.
    We have become friends by now and the bracelet can stay (mostly because it defines the character of the watch)

    246096.JPG


    view from the side:

    246097.JPG

    This watch can't have seen any heavy refurbishment, the brushed surfaces are still brushed, the edges still nice and sharp.


    Here's another reason why the bracelet will stay:

    246098.JPG

    It's difficult to replace it with something else :D
    The gap between lugs is an awkward 19 mm to start with. Then there is the bit in the middle between the lugs where the round bit of the case breaks through the straight edge ...this looks awful when visible ...which it is when you put the watch on a leather strap.

    The end link here has already been butchered a bit to fit the non-original bracelet. Bigger, more modern bracelets will require further modification of the end links to make them fit ...or you leave the end link cover off and you're looking at that ugly bit again.


    Here you can see the thick (mineral) crystal

    246099.JPG

    The crystal itself is flawless, no scratches, perfect edges. The ledge it sits on ...not so much. I suspect that at some point the crystal was replaced and a hammer and chisel were used to remove the old one. The ledge has a fair few scratches and dings which shine through the edge of the perfect glass and make it look dirty/damaged


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    Here it is on the wrist:

    246101.JPG
    246102.JPG

    Thew thin and narrow bracelet makes the watchhead look even bigger but by now I rather like that (I didn't initially)

    The day shows in Arabic and English

    246103.JPG

    Friday (arabic) and Sunday (english) are marked in orange/red


    A view of the back

    246104.JPG

    The serial number starting with 56 indicates (according to the Seiko experts) that this watch was built in 1975 / June


    A comparison with my similarly sized Quondam:

    246105.JPG

    Due to the lack of a bezel (and the resulting big dial) and the narrow bracelet the Seiko looks quite impressively big, especially considering its age


Advertisement