Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Using mobile phone while driving

  • 24-02-2013 7:45pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,906 ✭✭✭


    What is it about people chatting on their mobile phones while driving? It has to be the single most ignored rule of the road.
    Delivery men, bus drivers, even the Gardai are blatant and constant offenders.

    In fairness to the taxi-drivers, they seem to be pretty compliant and use hands-free bluetooth almost all the time.

    I may be called sexist for this but as far as I can see, women are by far the biggest offenders. I was walking in the suburbs yesterday and the traffic was stopped at the lights. The first car in the line was driven by a young lady, busily texting while waiting for the green light. I would reckon from my own observation that female offenders are in a 2/3 majority here - and I'm not sexist in the least.

    Is it how this offence is so visible and immediately noticeable or is it one rule of the road no-one really takes seriously? Is it as widespread in other countries like the UK or the USA?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 699 ✭✭✭mikehammer67


    ya delivery men and bus drivers

    i see the same people everyday on their commute with the phone glued to their ear-wtf!

    penalties need to be stepped up
    it's more dangerous than no nct and bald tyres and drink hangover


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 405 ✭✭shooter88


    Yep women do it more yet are safer drivers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,058 ✭✭✭AltAccount


    shooter88 wrote: »
    Yep women do it more yet are safer drivers

    Link?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭php-fox


    >>penalties need to be stepped up
    Yep, we can introduce death penalty for all traffic offenses. But without enforcement they're useless.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 699 ✭✭✭mikehammer67


    php-fox wrote: »
    >>penalties need to be stepped up
    Yep, we can introduce death penalty for all traffic offenses. But without enforcement they're useless.
    no
    enforcement is lacking
    but steeper penalties are a deterrent

    how many phone drivers are drink drivers? not many


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 221 ✭✭MrTsSnickers




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    tippman1 wrote: »
    Delivery men, bus drivers, even the Gardai are blatant and constant offenders.

    Gardai are not subject to that particular law.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 385 ✭✭Lawless2k12


    P!sses me off to the max when I see a trucker at it. The damage they could do with all that weight behind them is serious!

    I don't think women ARE really worse for it, I'd say they just have much longer conversations. Men will basically be on the phone for 2 to 5 mins. Women, no offence, are on for a good 20 mins.



    Quote from the link above by MrTsSnickers:
    Some 28 per cent of men said they’d had a near miss/collision as a result of looking at an attractive woman, by far the cause of the highest percentage of distraction leading to a near miss.

    So true :')


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,100 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    no
    enforcement is lacking
    but steeper penalties are a deterrent

    how many phone drivers are drink drivers? not many

    A deterrent is only affective if it's enforced. Exceeding the posted limit and DUI are actively enforced, nothing else is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,026 ✭✭✭0ph0rce0


    P!sses me off to the max when I see a trucker at it. The damage they could do with all that weight behind them is serious!

    I don't think women ARE really worse for it, I'd say they just have much longer conversations. Men will basically be on the phone for 2 to 5 mins. Women, no offence, are on for a good 20 mins.



    Quote from the link above by MrTsSnickers:



    So true :')

    Honestly cant count the number of times i've **** my pants and nearly crashed, and crashed too or driven off the road because i'd be looking at someones fine hoop.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 385 ✭✭Lawless2k12


    0ph0rce0 wrote: »
    Honestly cant count the number of times i've **** my pants and nearly crashed, and crashed too or driven off the road because i'd be looking at someones fine hoop.

    I try not to look at people when I'm driving now, I only gawk when I'm stopped... Hate when someone's in the car and they shout "LOOK AT THE H0L3 ON THAT WAN". You have to look... to not look is... just... basically...
    80b01ae1_impossibru.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,015 ✭✭✭✭Mc Love


    Weirdest and dangerous think I have seen is a young lady (possible student) studying a book while driving on the M7 :eek: :eek:

    The book was open on the steering wheel - maybe should have called Trafficwatch


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,732 ✭✭✭weisses


    €220 fine in the Netherlands when caught using your mobile while driving


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,543 ✭✭✭Pataman


    A friend of mine is a motorbike garda and tells me he catches loads. So there is some enforcement. Its just the old chestneu of nut enough gardai.
    TBH the law should be changed to allow a mobile camera to be placed by the side of the road to catch offenders with a civilian processing the evidence back at base.


  • Posts: 24,714 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    tippman1 wrote: »
    I was walking in the suburbs yesterday and the traffic was stopped at the lights. The first car in the line was driven by a young lady, busily texting while waiting for the green light. I would reckon from my own observation that female offenders are in a 2/3 majority here - and I'm not sexist in the least.

    I don't see the problem here to be honest, what harm can you do while stopped. Worst case scenario it takes her a second or two longer to spot the lights changing and while annoying its not going to do any harm on anybody. I know she would get done for it but I think its wrong. You should have to be moving to commit an offence imo.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,386 ✭✭✭monkeypants


    Bruthal wrote: »
    Gardai are not subject to that particular law.
    Why's that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,094 ✭✭✭BraveDonut


    It annoys me when you see people on the phone in a really expensive car - buy a frickin car kit, you can afford it!:mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,563 ✭✭✭leeroybrown


    Why's that?
    All the emergency services are exempt from the ban while doing their duty. It makes sense for them to be able to use communication devices.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,971 ✭✭✭✭joujoujou
    Unregistered Users


    I thought they all have their radios with them. :o

    ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,058 ✭✭✭AltAccount



    What's that a link to exactly?

    It doesn't say women use phones more than men while driving, in fact it doesn't seem to mention phones at all...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,100 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    BraveDonut wrote: »
    It annoys me when you see people on the phone in a really expensive car - buy a frickin car kit, you can afford it!:mad:

    The thing is most new cars have Bluetooth.
    All the emergency services are exempt from the ban while doing their duty. It makes sense for them to be able to use communication devices.

    IIRC it's only the Gardaí who are exempt all the time, other emergency services are only exempt when on blues and twos. Still doesn't make it any safer for a Garda to drive on the phone than an ordinary Joe public and IMO they should be setting a better example by role modelling best driving practice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,080 ✭✭✭✭Big Nasty


    Whatever about people driving whilst using the phone it's the fvckin' numpties that seem to think you're ok if you turn your phone on speaker and hold it 20cm away from your face instead of up to your ear.. Like what difference does that make?

    Thick cvnts! :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭RandomAccess


    MCMLXXV wrote: »
    Whatever about people driving whilst using the phone it's the fvckin' numpties that seem to think you're ok if you turn your phone on speaker and hold it 20cm away from your face instead of up to your ear.. Like what difference does that make?

    Thick cvnts! :mad:

    That way the cops think its a dictaphone ya see.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,302 ✭✭✭Supergurrier


    Women are by far the worst, always see women where i live on the phone even pulling out of juctions


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,569 ✭✭✭✭ProudDUB


    joujoujou wrote: »
    I thought they all have their radios with them.

    Garda radios do not cover the entire country. They have limited ranges. So if a Guard in Dublin has a question about a person in Limerick that he is going down there to arrest/question, he'll have to use a phone to contact the local boys in blue in Limerick. The radio won't work.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,563 ✭✭✭leeroybrown


    joujoujou wrote: »
    I thought they all have their radios with them. :o

    ;)
    As I understand it the Garda radio system is somewhat improved but it's never exactly been brilliant. At it's worst a few years ago mobile phones were covering for it a lot in some areas.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,386 ✭✭✭monkeypants


    As I understand it the Garda radio system is somewhat improved but it's never exactly been brilliant. At it's worst a few years ago mobile phones were covering for it a lot in some areas.
    Huh? So rather than improving their radio system, they've instead decided to behave in a way that's dangerous enough to require legislation for the rest of us.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,563 ✭✭✭leeroybrown


    Huh? So rather than improving their radio system, they've instead decided to behave in a way that's dangerous enough to require legislation for the rest of us.
    No. The government made a practical decision to allow Gardaí (and other emergency services members) to use mobile phones in pursuit of their duties rather than pulling in for calls while they're doing an important job. I for one have no problem with the small number of Gardaí we have on the roads being able to do this. The other 99.9% of the driving population can do the sensible thing and keep both hands free for driving.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,411 ✭✭✭ABajaninCork


    Women are by far the worst, always see women where i live on the phone even pulling out of juctions

    Not this bird!! :D I don't have Bluetooth and don't answer the phone if driving. Used to drive my boss nuts when I worked as a PA .

    Nothing is so important, it cannot wait until I stop.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,386 ✭✭✭monkeypants


    No. The government made a practical decision to allow Gardaí (and other emergency services members) to use mobile phones in pursuit of their duties rather than pulling in for calls while they're doing an important job. I for one have no problem with the small number of Gardaí we have on the roads being able to do this. The other 99.9% of the driving population can do the sensible thing and keep both hands free for driving.
    Why can't they use hands-free like everyone else?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,886 ✭✭✭✭Roger_007


    I was driving on the M1 a few days ago and was behind a car with a lady driver who was on her mobile phone. I could also see her turning around every 20 seconds or so to look in the back seat. I decided to overtake her and while I was doing so I noticed that there was a baby seat in the back, (presumably with a baby in it). I'm not sure which is the more dangerous, being on the phone or keeping an eye on the baby.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 932 ✭✭✭paddyland


    I don't see the problem here to be honest, what harm can you do while stopped. Worst case scenario it takes her a second or two longer to spot the lights changing and while annoying its not going to do any harm on anybody. I know she would get done for it but I think its wrong. You should have to be moving to commit an offence imo.

    Absolutely wrong.

    I drive hours and hours every day. The congestion in Dublin is bad due to the amount of traffic lights necessary. One of the primary contributers to congestion is people who won't move when they get a green light, and one of the primary contributers to that is drivers concentrating on mobile phones rather than what is going on around them.

    Now a car not moving away on a green light might not matter to you when you are pootling down to the shop for your morning newspaper at ten thirty in the morning.

    But it bloody sure matters to someone who drives for a living, and spends hours each day stuck in traffic, and wastes time and money for no reason because people can't be bothered to pay attention. The cumulative effect is ENORMOUS, and you need to be out in traffic all day to understand that.

    Whether you are driving, or stopped in traffic, you PAY ATTENTION. Lose the phone.


Advertisement