Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

quick question gravity circulation

  • 18-02-2013 6:16pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16


    hi all,,,,normally when i do a stove,,when i take the 3/4 inch rad circuit off the primary 1" ,,i take the two 3/4 inch pipes down the way and then off to the rads and via pump with stat,,,the reason why is that if i keep them staight or riseing etc and then off to the rads upstairs etc,,,i feel the riseing pipework would take alot of the heat off the coil and circulate upstairs,,,taking the pump longer to kick in etc,,,

    so now as i stated earlier,i tend to go down first and then away to up and downstairs rads etc

    would you agree with me doing this way,,,,letting the coil and the boiler in the in the stove get good circulation(heat) build up before boosting it away

    i suppose other people have other ways but i think my way is fine,,,wat you think


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,404 ✭✭✭corkgsxr


    Dropping down to break the gravity to the rads?

    Couldnt fault that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16 straideman


    im only doing it to let the coil and stove gett better so the stat will get to temp quicker and kick the pump in,,,seriously i offen wondered about that

    are you serious in saying what i am doin g is fine,,,seems to work well when i do it,,,


    corkgsxr wrote: »
    Dropping down to break the gravity to the rads?

    Couldnt fault that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,404 ✭✭✭corkgsxr


    Means no heat goes to the rads untill pump kicks in. Heat will keep going where you want it to


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 680 ✭✭✭sanbrafyffe


    i dont see any problem with the way this guy does it.the pump will deliver it quickly when it told do so by the stat.he is just quizative thats all


    corkgsxr wrote: »
    Means no heat goes to the rads untill pump kicks in. Heat will keep going where you want it to


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16 straideman


    is this ok the way i am doing it,,,what way would you do it for example


    corkgsxr wrote: »
    Means no heat goes to the rads untill pump kicks in. Heat will keep going where you want it to


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,677 ✭✭✭shane0007


    straideman wrote: »
    is this ok the way i am doing it,,,what way would you do it for example
    It won't make a blind bit of difference. There will be no gravity flow to the rads anyhow & the only way to encourage more heat to the cylinder is an injector tee.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,113 ✭✭✭freddyuk


    I thought the injector T stopped the "bypass" flow from returning into the cyclinder and cooling the cylinder down instead of the flow going back through the boiler return. So if there is no injector T the system is no good anyway?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 680 ✭✭✭sanbrafyffe


    mate,the way you do it urself is fine,,keep the pipe to the coil riseing and t awy for ur rad circuit,,go up or down,,aslong as u have a good pump,,,linked to ur stat,,,it will work away,,oh and have a good fire to keep it fireing:D,,,as shane said it makes no difference


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,677 ✭✭✭shane0007


    freddyuk wrote: »
    I thought the injector T stopped the "bypass" flow from returning into the cyclinder and cooling the cylinder down instead of the flow going back through the boiler return. So if there is no injector T the system is no good anyway?

    Injector tees are used to increase the flow to the cylinder. As the rad circuit is pumped, it can pull all the heat from the primary circuit into the secondary circuit thus not allowing any heat flow through to the coil. By installing an injector tee, it encourages flow to both.
    By not installing an injector tee, it is not wrong, but depending on the parameters of the installation, it can lead to issues with low hot water temps. The cylinder will creep heat whilst the pump is between cycles.
    A simple inexpensive solution is a self made injector tee with copper insert soldered into the fitting, otherwise purchased ones are very expensive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61 ✭✭paddy_joe


    shane0007 wrote: »

    Injector tees are used to increase the flow to the cylinder. As the rad circuit is pumped, it can pull all the heat from the primary circuit into the secondary circuit thus not allowing any heat flow through to the coil. By installing an injector tee, it encourages flow to both.
    By not installing an injector tee, it is not wrong, but depending on the parameters of the installation, it can lead to issues with low hot water temps. The cylinder will creep heat whilst the pump is between cycles.
    A simple inexpensive solution is a self made injector tee with copper insert soldered into the fitting, otherwise purchased ones are very expensive.


    Had never taught of making up one, always bought them. Thanks for tip Shane


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,097 ✭✭✭Dtp79


    paddy_joe wrote: »


    Had never taught of making up one, always bought them. Thanks for tip Shane
    Never bought one always made them!


Advertisement