Politician Ann Bressington exposes agenda 21 and club of Rome

Daithi 1

This is a good one. Brave girl..


Ann Bressington Exposes Agenda 21, Club of Rome, Sustainable Development, at the Lord Monckton Launch 2 Feb 2013 at the Adelaide Convention Centre.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sES6_OXPwOU

Torakx

Good post.
Its nice to be reminded now and then of exactly what is important in the world.
Its easy to get distracted with life and other CT's, but the whole push for centralisation of power, is such a dangerous idea to the common man.

Its such a shame the main stream media are in the pockets of these rich criminals.
Ive said it many a time.
One of the main issues is the control of peoples minds through TV.
It needs to be put out of action fullstop.
Then the newspapers.

Also for too long the Elite etc have been organising the masses terrorists for them.
That also needs to be changed or they will have no consequences to suffer for their actions.
Eeerrmm...and thats my theory on the political enviornment and the solutions lol

Jonny7

I have read about this. Here's the charter

http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm

Principle 1

Human beings are at the centre of concerns for sustainable development.
They are entitled to a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature.


Principle 2

States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the
principles of international law, the sovereign right to exploit their own
resources pursuant to their own environmental and developmental policies, and
the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or
control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas
beyond the limits of national jurisdiction.


Principle 3

The right to development must be fulfilled so as to equitably meet
developmental and environmental needs of present and future generations.

Principle 4

In order to achieve sustainable development, environmental protection
shall constitute an integral part of the development process and cannot be
considered in isolation from it.


Principle 5

All States and all people shall cooperate in the essential task of
eradicating poverty as an indispensable requirement for sustainable
development, in order to decrease the disparities in standards of living and
better meet the needs of the majority of the people of the world.

Seems fairly common sense to me.

Torakx

Religion professes peace and love to all men, forgiveness of trangressions and turning the other cheek.
That sounds like common sense to me, but look at how that worked out.
What seems to be and what IS may be two very different things when the longrun is taken into account.

This isnt automatic validation for the above theory.
But lets look into it and see where its most likely heading based on the foundations and those involved.
Actions do speak louder than words I believe in these types of situations.

Jonny7

Torakx wrote: »

Religion professes peace and love to all men, forgiveness of trangressions and turning the other cheek.
That sounds like common sense to me, but look at how that worked out.
What seems to be and what IS may be two very different things when the longrun is taken into account.

This isnt automatic validation for the above theory.
But lets look into it and see where its most likely heading based on the foundations and those involved.
Actions do speak louder than words I believe in these types of situations.

What negative has Agenda 21 actually done?

Torakx

Im not sure yet of the whole story.Its something im not that familiar with suprisingly,since this was a topic I would have searched years ago.
And may have different ideas about it now.
I probably have some rough ideas, but none would be acceptable to you im sure.
I would say the video might give some ideas on how to find out though if your interested in the CT.

My main point was that just because it seems sensible, does not mean the agenda overall or behind the scenes is sensible or what you or I may think it is.
A statement is no use to me anyway.It is simply just a statement.
They can state all the intentions they wish.
I would judge them on their actions and their merits on the results.