Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Essendon Shambles

  • 06-02-2013 6:09am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,919 ✭✭✭✭


    All kicking off for the Bombers over the last 24 hours with the news that they've asked the AFL to investigate the use of off site treatments for players.

    Supposedly the club only became aware that there might be an issue a few days ago, something I don't buy.

    Now it seems that the 'sports scientist' they were using isn't even accredited in Australia!

    There's some talk of the AFL booting them out of the comp this season though the more likely scenario is they'll get a few fines or similar nothing sanctions like Adelaide.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 282 ✭✭Nelson Muntz


    Yeah, it looks dogy as hell. I think the fact that the anti doping body is involved now will prevent the AFL slapping the scum with a wet lettuce.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,995 ✭✭✭DoctorGonzo08


    In the absence of a professional alignment, he cannot be disciplined or de-registered by ESSA

    Sounds like there is nothing that will be done. It seems a bit odd that because he isn't accredited, they can do nothing. Doesn't really make sense. If he was practicing then he should be liable. Could this become a criminal investigation?

    To be honest, the letter comes across more of a marketing campaign to become a Sports Scientist and the membership included rather than a beneficial investigation into player doping.

    Although it might explain the luck Essendon have had with uniformly 'emerging' Frankston players :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,995 ✭✭✭DoctorGonzo08


    Article on the DT relevance of the Essendon Shambles: http://dreamteamtalk.com/2013/02/14/the-big-issue/


Advertisement