Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Private Company to go to moon by 2020.

Options

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Problem is that your pool of passengers is quite limited - how many of them have the fitness of mind and body to manage the journey without dying or going postal? Also have to wonder how the company proposes to profit from it.

    I imagine the company's primary income stream will actually be technology developed as a consequence of making these flights, rather than the flights themselves.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,029 ✭✭✭Rhys Essien


    seamus wrote: »
    Problem is that your pool of passengers is quite limited - how many of them have the fitness of mind and body to manage the journey without dying or going postal? Also have to wonder how the company proposes to profit from it.

    I imagine the company's primary income stream will actually be technology developed as a consequence of making these flights, rather than the flights themselves.

    Did that matter to the seven 'tourists' who have already been to the ISS.

    They spent between 8 and 15 days in Space.

    A return trip to the Moon would take ~8 days.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭nokia69


    this will happen

    all they really need is a lander

    everything else is ready to go or will be finished soon


  • Registered Users Posts: 325 ✭✭ThatDrGuy


    Space tourists went on extremely reliable and proven Soyuz technology. No one is going to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to be a test monkey. They would go broke in the trial phase. There is also a massive difference in being worth X and having liquid assets of X.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭nokia69


    ThatDrGuy wrote: »
    Space tourists went on extremely reliable and proven Soyuz technology. No one is going to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to be a test monkey. They would go broke in the trial phase. There is also a massive difference in being worth X and having liquid assets of X.

    jeff bezos, paul allen, elon musk

    thats the kind of people who would pay hundreds of millions to walk on the moon


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 325 ✭✭ThatDrGuy


    nokia69 wrote: »
    jeff bezos, paul allen, elon musk

    thats the kind of people who would pay hundreds of millions to walk on the moon

    Perhaps but would they pay hundreds of millions to smash into the lunar surface because the lander hadn't been tested ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭nokia69


    ThatDrGuy wrote: »
    Perhaps but would they pay hundreds of millions to smash into the lunar surface because the lander hadn't been tested ?

    of course not

    the lander would be tested as much as possibe on earth


  • Registered Users Posts: 325 ✭✭ThatDrGuy


    nokia69 wrote: »
    of course not

    the lander would be tested as much as possibe on earth

    Lol.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,551 ✭✭✭Rubecula


    I am too much of a sceptic to think this will happen by 2020


  • Registered Users Posts: 952 ✭✭✭hytrogen


    I make reference to what Red Bull stratos did a while back when saying feats like these are what make dreams reality...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭nokia69


    ThatDrGuy wrote: »
    Lol.

    thats what they did the last time

    did it work then ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 325 ✭✭ThatDrGuy


    nokia69 wrote: »
    thats what they did the last time

    did it work then ?

    Might want to read up on Apollo 1 ( fatal ) and 10 ( the test run ).
    Though admittedly the first lunar test of the actual landing bit was on the moon ( safety standards of the 60's) and that largely succeeded thanks to Armstrong's fantastic skills. The next landers were more high tech and probably could be copied but not without incredible financial clout. But these guys were hardened test pilots not software engineers, its a whole different risk reward mentality.

    The amount of capital they would need to get this off the ground would be several billion dollars. Just to ferry a few billionaires into space. This is a classic salary draw down scam - spend years in feasablity studies while the board siphons off massive amount of the investors cash. Then it folds, oh damn no refunds - like so many other private space companies ( seriously search them out, the amount is impressive )


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭nokia69


    ThatDrGuy wrote: »

    The amount of capital they would need to get this off the ground would be several billion dollars. Just to ferry a few billionaires into space. This is a classic salary draw down scam - spend years in feasablity studies while the board siphons off massive amount of the investors cash. Then it folds, oh damn no refunds - like so many other private space companies ( seriously search them out, the amount is impressive )

    yes it could be a scam

    but I still think we will see a private mission to the moon

    once the falcon heavy lifts off the pad, and it will, the only other thing needed is a lander and there are people working on landers now

    I read an interview a while ago with one of the investers in spaceX (not musk BTW) and he said he wanted to walk on the moon, he said he had no interest in Mars he just wanted to go to the moon

    not all billionaires are space nerds but some of them are, and it only takes a handfull to have an interest in going to the moon

    sit back and watch it happen


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,482 ✭✭✭Kidchameleon


    I could definitely see a moon orbit trip as being plausible (I cant understand why this isn't happening NOW), but a landing with EVA, not a chance.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,546 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Rubecula wrote: »
    I am too much of a sceptic to think this will happen by 2020

    They'd be lucky to have this happen by 2030, don't mind 2020.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,324 ✭✭✭Cork boy 55


    Capitalism lost the run of its self after its victory over the communism
    I.e. the rise of massive inequality the super rich

    I believe/hope we are now heading into age of more
    reasonable green capitalism
    which will seriously reduce the amount of super rich in the world

    In 10-20 years they simply will not be people around with this sort of wealth


  • Registered Users Posts: 325 ✭✭ThatDrGuy


    Capitalism lost the run of its self after its victory over the communism
    I.e. the rise of massive inequality the super rich

    I believe/hope we are now heading into age of more
    reasonable green capitalism
    which will seriously reduce the amount of super rich in the world

    In 10-20 years they simply will not be people around with this sort of wealth

    Id love to believe that but based on what ? Tax rates for the rich are plummeting everywhere (check out the UK's latest tax "reforms"). Over the last 5 years 99% of the population have gotten poorer while the rest have gotten much richer. At the moment the richest 400 people in the USA have more combined wealth than the bottom 150 million put together.
    This process will continue with no end in sight as the wealthiest acquire the assets of the crushed middle class for a song. What we are seeing is a new type of feudalism and privilege - two types of people 1: I want to walk on the moon 2: I want to eat.


  • Registered Users Posts: 952 ✭✭✭hytrogen


    Capitalism lost the run of its self after its victory over the communism
    I.e. the rise of massive inequality the super rich

    I believe/hope we are now heading into age of more
    reasonable green capitalism
    which will seriously reduce the amount of super rich in the world

    In 10-20 years they simply will not be people around with this sort of wealth
    Views best directed & voiced in the 'politics' and / or 'finance' threads perhaps. Consumerism is at fault there with the shallow greed of possession over progression in many sectors, not capitalism.
    I believe OP may have started this thread in celebration of the prospects of (capitalists in) the private sector attaining the goals of revisiting the moon in the near future which is very exciting for the evolution of mankind


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,829 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    hytrogen wrote: »
    I make reference to what Red Bull stratos did a while back when saying feats like these are what make dreams reality...
    weather balloons are in use daily around the world so going up is easy

    coming down was even easier , again using off the shelf technology


    cba looking up if he got higher than almost any tourist can get in the back seat of a Mig


Advertisement