Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Looking To Downgrade

  • 05-12-2012 2:27pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭


    Hey guys,

    I currently have a 1.5 car, and lately it has been annoying me the tax I'm paying and how little the petrol lasts especially as I usually only use it for driving small distances with an odd long journey. So I was thinking of downgrading. Was thinking between these three:

    Volkswagon Polo 1.2.
    Renault Clio 1.2.
    Opel Corsa 1.2.

    Wanted in or around a 2003, hoping to have 2000 or so euro to spend after getting rid of my car, which would be the best? Also what would be the nicest to drive and most comfortable considering I'm downgrading froma 1.5?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 866 ✭✭✭renofan


    What car do you drive? To be honest if you can't afford to tax a 1.5 can you really afford a car?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭chops018


    renofan wrote: »
    What car do you drive? To be honest if you can't afford to tax a 1.5 can you really afford a car?

    Of course I can afford to tax a 1.5 and I'm not trying to sound pompous in saying this but I could afford to tax a 2.0 if I wanted to, I just don't think there is a need for an engine size for the small distances I usually drive so I said I might aswell save the money on tax and the bit on petrol and downgrade to a 1.2.

    Also I have had my car for nearly two years and getting a bit sick of it now. It's a Nissan Almera by the way.

    Anyway this isn't a discussion of whether I can afford a car or not, I decided to go to a lower engine and wondering which of the above would be good when downgrading?

    Edit: saw your name, you will probably suggest the Clio so haha?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 866 ✭✭✭renofan


    Sorry, I picked it up that you couldn't afford the tax. I'm not a small car person (even though I have a Micra - only keeping as it was my first car and its handy as a run-about) so can't really recommend any of the ones you mention, though my brother's fiancee has a '99 clio and it is ok to drive, but with any small car you have less room and long journey's are a pain.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    chops018 wrote: »
    Of course I can afford to tax a 1.5 and I'm not trying to sound pompous in saying this but I could afford to tax a 2.0 if I wanted to, I just don't think there is a need for an engine size for the small distances I usually drive so I said I might aswell save the money on tax and the bit on petrol and downgrade to a 1.2.

    Also I have had my car for nearly two years and getting a bit sick of it now. It's a Nissan Almera by the way.

    Anyway this isn't a discussion of whether I can afford a car or not, I decided to go to a lower engine and wondering which of the above would be good when downgrading?

    Edit: saw your name, you will probably suggest the Clio so haha?
    The savings will be buttons compared to the cost of changing. If you want to change anyway then focus on the actual car in front of you rather than getting caught up in make/model - condition and history are paramount at the lower end of the market.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,575 ✭✭✭166man


    Out of the 3 my choice would be a Polo 1.2, however why don't you go the whole way and get a 2001 VW Polo 1.0l?

    Relatively low tax, good fuel consumption as in, it sure as hell will be better than the Almera, they're a grand yoke for heading to the shops and that. Should pick one up for about €1500. Would be my choice anyway.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,865 ✭✭✭✭MuppetCheck


    Almera's aren't all that heavy on juice to be honest. The savings will be minimal on short journeys, and on long ones the smaller engines may struggle to the detriment of economy. But it all depends on the car too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭chops018


    166man wrote: »
    Out of the 3 my choice would be a Polo 1.2, however why don't you go the whole way and get a 2001 VW Polo 1.0l?

    Relatively low tax, good fuel consumption as in, it sure as hell will be better than the Almera, they're a grand yoke for heading to the shops and that. Should pick one up for about €1500. Would be my choice anyway.

    Yeah I was looking at them, my friend has a 01 one and is letting me have a spin in it later, my Father told me to get a 1.2 at least as he said the 1.0 wouldn't pull you out of bed haha. He recommended the Clio. Gonna try see what I'll get for my yoke first and in the mean time try get a spin in all three, just trying to see what the people of boards think of them.
    Anan1 wrote: »
    The savings will be buttons compared to the cost of changing. If you want to change anyway then focus on the actual car in front of you rather than getting caught up in make/model - condition and history are paramount at the lower end of the market.

    Well it shouldn't be too bad, I will wait to get rid of my car first and see what I get for it, I'm in no rush really. Some of the 00-03 Clio's aren't too expensive, neither are the 00 or 01 Polo's. In saying that I do realise you nearly always have to spend a couple of hundred on any second hand car you buy, but it won't bother me if I break even either way or spend an extra couple of hundred, I would hopefully be keeping it for 2-3 years.
    renofan wrote: »
    Sorry, I picked it up that you couldn't afford the tax. I'm not a small car person (even though I have a Micra - only keeping as it was my first car and its handy as a run-about) so can't really recommend any of the ones you mention, though my brother's fiancee has a '99 clio and it is ok to drive, but with any small car you have less room and long journey's are a pain.

    No problem, I assumed you would go with the Clio considering your name haha.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭chops018


    Almera's aren't all that heavy on juice to be honest. The savings will be minimal on short journeys, and on long ones the smaller engines may struggle to the detriment of economy. But it all depends on the car too.

    Apart from a 96 Opel Corsa to start off, and a 1.8 Honda Accord in between for a year (lovely car) I have had Almera's the whole way up. Two 1997 one's, both for nearly two and a half years. Absolutely brilliant car, lovely to drive and grand enough on the juice. However I have had the 2003 Almera nearly two years and I never really got to like it, I never hated it but I never thought it as nice to drive as the 1997 one's and always felt it harder on petrol. The 1997's seem a bit too old now to be going back to so I was thinking of a 00-03 1.2 yoke.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,865 ✭✭✭✭MuppetCheck


    Have a look at a Fiesta 1.25 - should pick up a decent one for less than budget.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,575 ✭✭✭166man


    chops018 wrote: »
    Yeah I was looking at them, my friend has a 01 one and is letting me have a spin in it later, my Father told me to get a 1.2 at least as he said the 1.0 wouldn't pull you out of bed haha. He recommended the Clio. Gonna try see what I'll get for my yoke first and in the mean time try get a spin in all three, just trying to see what the people of boards think of them

    A 1.2 Polo is no pocket rocket either. If you want something to pull you out of bed you need to sacrifice the fuel economy it's as simple as that.

    On the Almera, a mate in my class in college has a beige 2007 Almera Saloon and he complains it's a dog on juice although he's never given figures. Think his is the 1.5 too. Can't imagine it would be great tbh


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭chops018


    166man wrote: »
    A 1.2 Polo is no pocket rocket either. If you want something to pull you out of bed you need to sacrifice the fuel economy it's as simple as that.

    On the Almera, a mate in my class in college has a beige 2007 Almera Saloon and he complains it's a dog on juice although he's never given figures. Think his is the 1.5 too. Can't imagine it would be great tbh

    I suppose that's true, I will have to sacrifice the extra bit of power but I don't really use it to be honest, I always stick to the speed limits on long journeys and I'm sure a 1.2 would be well able for 60 to 70 mph on the odd long journey I take. Other than that I wouldn't need the power for going around at home.

    Yeah I was never impressed with the fuel consumption of my Almera, my Father worked it out and reckons I get about 30 or maybe 32 to the gallon. He said I should get 40 or 42 to the gallon on a 1.2 but sure every little helps and it would be few quid less on tax, I just don't think it makes sense to have a big engine unless your travelling 60 or 70 miles a day. Another thing that is making me switch is the fact that I'm really not enjoying driving the car for the last while so I see it as a good opportunity to downgrade, but again I'm in no rush and will be testing the above cars to see what I think before I go and do anything too quick.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,575 ✭✭✭166man


    Have a look at a Fiesta 1.25 - should pick up a decent one for less than budget.

    Actually this is a very good suggestion

    +1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,088 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    O/T: I expect this thread to get a lot busier in the next few weeks... :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭chops018


    Dunno about the Fiesta's was never too fond of them.

    My cousin always had Clio's and he swears by them, had a browse online and it looks like you would pick up a 02 for 1000-1400 quid. Way cheaper than the Polo's. I may get test driving and see what I think, then stick my own yoke on the internet and see what I get for that firstly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 462 ✭✭john kinsella


    +1 for Fiesta 1.25 great little cars

    My girlfriend had a 2003 Clio which was horrible to drive. I swear to God the truning circle was similar to the QE2.

    Out of your list I would go with the Polo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,721 ✭✭✭✭CianRyan


    My Almera (GA14) seems to love petrol. I've not worked it out for myself but I've looked up figures and generally people are getting 30-35mpg. In a 1.4 hatch back that's a bit nuts!
    I might as well have a VZR at that rate.

    I'd back the Fiesta for you OP.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,173 ✭✭✭FridaysWell


    OP I've a VW Polo '01 with a nice little 1 liter 4 cylinder engine. Nice to drive and they are built quite well. If you can find a good one of those for a good price go for it. Make sure the TB and WP were done though. Miser on petrol and can cope well with motorway driving.

    '02+ Polos are great cars too, driven a few, if you dont mind the 3 cylinder engine than they a nice car to drive and have a nicer interior compared to the '01 Polos. Good economy and they are very comfortable.

    Clios are ok, not as refined or well built as the Polos, but a better choice than the Corsa. Good on petrol and interior is nice and comfy. Drive one you might find you like it. Try and avoid Corsas they arnt bad cars but the other two are better on the inside, outside and mechanically (debateable for the Clio)

    Good luck!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,030 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    Nissan Micra.
    2003
    1.0
    €1950

    Full-16074720.jpeg

    http://cars.donedeal.ie/for-sale/cars/4269924
    _______________________________________________________

    Fiat Panda
    2004
    1.0
    €1700

    Full-15720304.jpeg

    http://cars.donedeal.ie/for-sale/cars/4198773#


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,127 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Op i see zero point in changing from a 1.5 to a 1.2L as things stand at the moment, your talking about saving E77 per year!!! If you want to make the savings in any way worthwhile and they will still be negligible, Id got for a 1L...

    CC
    1000 E185 p/a
    1100 E278
    1200 E307
    1300 E333
    1400 E358
    1500 E384


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,865 ✭✭✭✭MuppetCheck


    CianRyan wrote: »
    My Almera (GA14) seems to love petrol. I've not worked it out for myself but I've looked up figures and generally people are getting 30-35mpg. In a 1.4 hatch back that's a bit nuts!
    I might as well have a VZR at that rate.

    I'd back the Fiesta for you OP.

    Depends on the type of driving really. If it's urban than that's pretty much all you can expect. I drove a newer 2003 Almera for a while and it would average mid-high 30s, on a run it would break 40 easily.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,157 ✭✭✭✭Alanstrainor


    chops018 wrote: »
    Dunno about the Fiesta's was never too fond of them.

    My cousin always had Clio's and he swears by them, had a browse online and it looks like you would pick up a 02 for 1000-1400 quid. Way cheaper than the Polo's. I may get test driving and see what I think, then stick my own yoke on the internet and see what I get for that firstly.

    The engine in the fiestas are cracking. Really good for what they are.

    I suppose they are getting on a bit now, so it's worth checking for rust on any of these, but a fiesta should be in the 1000 kind of price range I reckon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,173 ✭✭✭FridaysWell


    OP +1 on the Panda too, great car! If you dont mind the looks and road stance its another great 1.0L car


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭chops018


    Thanks for all the replies guys.. Plenty of food for thought there. Didn't know the 02 Polo's were 3 cylinder thanks for telling me, don't think I would go near a 3 cylinder.

    Well the little saving on tax would be a bonus but I'm more so sick of driving a 1.5 around the town and it drinking petrol.

    My dad has a 1.2 micra, it's ok but they do seem expensive. The Clio seems like the most value, and there is a heap of them around so they must be ok, and sure you never know what you are getting buying a second hand car. Thinking between the 1149 cc Clio or a 1.0 Polo. Again I may see what my car fetches first haha, and test drive the above, may get onto some people I know with them - friends mother has a 01 Polo so I will try organise a nice long drive of it, and cousin has a 05 Clio so must organise a loan of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,127 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Well the little saving on tax would be a bonus but I'm more so sick of driving a 1.5 around the town and it drinking petrol.

    My dad has a 1.2 micra, it's ok but they do seem expensive. The Clio seems like the most value, and there is a heap of them around so they must be ok. Thinking between the 1149 cc Clio or a 1.0 Polo. Again I may see what my car fetches first haha.
    mpg goes down drastically in any car when it comes to town driving. How much are you putting into her every week OP? Topgear have said it and Ill say it again, a lot of it is not what you drive, but how you drive it...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭chops018


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    mpg goes down drastically in any car when it comes to town driving. How much are you putting into her every week OP? Topgear have said it and Ill say it again, a lot of it is not what you drive, but how you drive it...

    Well I would have always considered myself to drive the car fairly well through the gears. I would put about €30 a week into it for just driving about the town and an odd spin for pleasure. If any additional journey's are done i.e. 25 miles or further I usually put another tenner in it depending on distance.

    My father does similar driving to me apart from I drive to and from work, which is only 5 mins away, and he usually put's 10 quid into his, sometimes 20.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,127 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Well I would have always considered myself to drive the car fairly well through the gears. I would put about €30 a week into it for just driving about the town and an odd spin for pleasure. If any additional journey's are done i.e. 25 miles or further I usually put another tenner in it depending on distance.

    My father does similar driving to me apart from I drive to and from work, which is only 5 mins away, and he usually put's 10 quid into his, sometimes 20.

    you see as your drives are only 5 mins, fuel economy will also be poor, due to the cold starts. the way I see it if you move to a 1.2 is, currently you are only paying extra E77 per year for 300cc & you get the advantages of that. take a look at the gap per extra 100cc between 2L and 2.1 and 2.5L and 2.6 = E183 and E199 respectively.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,721 ✭✭✭✭CianRyan


    Depends on the type of driving really. If it's urban than that's pretty much all you can expect. I drove a newer 2003 Almera for a while and it would average mid-high 30s, on a run it would break 40 easily.

    I guess that's it really, I'm mostly doing short runs and it's barely getting up to temp', seems to do well on longer, steadier journeys though alright.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭chops018


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    you see as your drives are only 5 mins, fuel economy will also be poor, due to the cold starts. the way I see it if you move to a 1.2 is, currently you are only paying extra E77 per year for 300cc & you get the advantages of that. take a look at the gap per extra 100cc between 2L and 2.1 and 2.5L and 2.6 = E183 and E199 respectively.

    I didn't look at it that way, I won't be doing anything hasty anyway. I was thinking of a car change and thought why not downgrade for the bit of saving that might be done on tax/petrol even if it is only a little. All food for thought though, all the posters on here have been very helpful so thanks to all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,313 ✭✭✭Mycroft H


    CianRyan wrote: »
    My Almera (GA14) seems to love petrol. I've not worked it out for myself but I've looked up figures and generally people are getting 30-35mpg. In a 1.4 hatch back that's a bit nuts!
    I might as well have a VZR at that rate.

    I'd back the Fiesta for you OP.

    Would sound right. They're not awfully economical cars and it's a bit rubbish for a 1.4.


    I can push 46mpg and average 42mpg in my 1.4 Clio.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement