Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Do I have to accept a Depreciated Refund

  • 03-12-2012 10:14pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46


    Hi, I've had a home appliance repaired 4 times in the past 2 months. The appliance had a 2 yr warranty that was upgraded to 5 yrs by the manufacturer owing to a design fault which the manufacturer owned up to on BBC Watchdog. the appliance was recalled. Mine broke down. It's now 4 years old. The appliance has been repaired free of charge but its still not working and within the 5 yr extended warranty. The manufacturer has offered a depreciated refund based on how old it is etc etc. the figure has not been give, but I reckon it'll be quite low. I have requested a replacement appliance of similar age/condition without the defect (a different model) The have agreed but are finding it difficult to source. Do I have any rights? If they can't replace should I push for a new appliance? Am I entitled to a new one if they can't replace. Thanks


Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,381 ✭✭✭Doom


    Realistically were the original goods of merchantable quality....I doubt it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 368 ✭✭Morph the Cat


    The item was clearly never right. Under the Sale of Good & Supply of Services Act, it was not of merchantable quality & not fit for purpose. You have accepted repairs, but it still broke repeatedly. They have also publicly admitted a design flaw. With the constant breakdowns & repairs, it has caused you nothing but headaches for the last 4 years. You have a rock-solid case for a full refund.

    Tell them you'll see them in Small Claims court (and follow through - it's only €25). The elapsed time is irrelevant, since it was never properly fixed (and it's under warranty) - and if anything, they fact that it dragged on so long works in your favour. Establishing the depreciated value is also subjective and a pointless task.

    Small Claims court.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,373 ✭✭✭✭foggy_lad


    If it only started giving problems after three or four years then a partial refund would be quite reasonable as you will have had some use of the product but yours has been unfit for purpose from soon after purchase so should be replaced or refunded at its value from that point which would have been a full refund.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,518 ✭✭✭✭dudara


    You've had use of the appliance for the past 4 years, so it's unrealistic to expect a full refund. You really should have pushed to have it replaced etc earlier than this. Replacement with a comparable appliance would be a good resolution.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    Your SoGSoS rights are from your purchase off the retailer, not the manufacturer.

    If the manufacturer is giving a 5 year warranty, there's a reasonable expectation it would stay working longer than 5 years, an implied term.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement