Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Off-World Colonies

  • 27-11-2012 8:53pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 134 ✭✭


    A new life awaits you...

    http://www.space.com/18596-mars-colony-spacex-elon-musk.html

    Elon Musk(founder of SpaceX) wants to settle Mars. Tickets are looking to be $500,000. On twitter he has said that 80,000 colonists a year are needed.
    It's a long way off, but pretty interesting/cool all the same.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,624 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    It's nothing but a cheap publicity stunt, same as the one Pan Am did in the 1970s when they started taking bookings for the first scheduled flight to the Moon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭nokia69


    its not a publicity stunt, musk wants to send people to mars and he wants to go there himself

    everything spaceX do is based on the long term goal of walking on mars, for a while I thought musk was a bull****ter, just looking for headlines, but the man is the real deal

    unlike pan am he is building rockets and has sent payload to LEO and returned it, not bad for a private company, large countries have tried less and failed

    if musk can make his falcon 9 reuseable then he will reach mars, its will just be a matter of time

    but first we will see a return to the moon and I bet it will be musks falcon heavy that will send a private mission to the moon in the next ten years

    a return to the moon is easy and could be done for a few billion mars is harder for now but it will happen


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 325 ✭✭ThatDrGuy


    Why would anyone want to go to live on Mars? All the water is at the poles where there is little to no sunlight for crops. The lack of a magnetosphere means large amounts of radiation - way too much to actually spend much time there. 38% G means severe osteoporosis in the long term too with all the calcium leaching out of your bones causing chronic kidney stones. The place is a desert, certainly beautiful in its way but so is death valley (which no one is daft enough to attempt to colonise ) The scientific bases in Antartica are totally unsustainable without massive imports of supplies which would be economic lunacy to try on Mars. Private firms need to make profits - beyond the scientific and tourism there is nothing much on mars.


  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,531 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    ThatDrGuy wrote: »
    Why would anyone want to go to live on Mars? All the water is at the poles where there is little to no sunlight for crops. The lack of a magnetosphere means large amounts of radiation - way too much to actually spend much time there. 38% G means severe osteoporosis in the long term too with all the calcium leaching out of your bones causing chronic kidney stones. The place is a desert, certainly beautiful in its way but so is death valley (which no one is daft enough to attempt to colonise ) The scientific bases in Antartica are totally unsustainable without massive imports of supplies which would be economic lunacy to try on Mars. Private firms need to make profits - beyond the scientific and tourism there is nothing much on mars.

    Would be much better off putting the money into a manned research mission rather than aiming to colonise. It's a classic case of trying to walk before they can run.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,029 ✭✭✭Rhys Essien


    ThatDrGuy wrote: »
    Why would anyone want to go to live on Mars? All the water is at the poles where there is little to no sunlight for crops. The lack of a magnetosphere means large amounts of radiation - way too much to actually spend much time there. 38% G means severe osteoporosis in the long term too with all the calcium leaching out of your bones causing chronic kidney stones. The place is a desert, certainly beautiful in its way but so is death valley (which no one is daft enough to attempt to colonise ) The scientific bases in Antartica are totally unsustainable without massive imports of supplies which would be economic lunacy to try on Mars. Private firms need to make profits - beyond the scientific and tourism there is nothing much on mars.

    Results from Curiosity recently has found that radiation levels would be the same as being on the ISS.

    http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/17/curiosity-rover-mars-radiation-levels-safe-for-humans/


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 325 ✭✭ThatDrGuy


    Background levels - wait till its hit by a solar flare.. that will be interesting data.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭nokia69


    http://spaceports.blogspot.ca/2012/12/golden-spike-to-make-announcement-dec-6.html#

    return to the moon being planned now :D

    first the moon then mars :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    If he can do return trips, I'm in. Best start saving.


Advertisement