Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

S47 Family Law

  • 15-11-2012 8:07pm
    #1
    Hannaho
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭


    I asked for S 47 as children were afraid of their dad and hated going to him. However s 47 assessor completely bent to bullying ex demands. For instance, he tolde that it was mandatory for lauds to b with their dad the night before he came with them for assessment. The lids and I had already told her that he tried to intimidate them onto not coming and not speaking up.t daughter, 11, sat trembling and crying as she was told she wud have to
    Spend the night before the asseseny with her dad. She was afraid he wud b interrogating her again. However. I got suspicious and found out from 5 different psychologists that it is not standard practice at all. It turned out that as well as telling a pack if lies about me, ex said he wud discredit her report if the children didn't stay the night before with him. They live with me so they were with me before our asseseny. Then she succeed to children's tears and said they cud b picked up by him on morning of assessment from train station. However as train stations are not great for kids, I changed meeting place to hotel across road, ex objected to this change and she lambasted me for getting her in hot water with ex. I fail to see that this was a probl but now kids have once again to b picked up by h the night before and they are once again stressed and afraid. She didn't even informe of this change but let abusive ex telle. Them she arranged for ex new wife to attend who cannot stand our children. I was never informed of this and the other psychologists say that ate parents don't usually attend. She had made no effort to contact my side of the fily, their teacher, doctor etc for corroboration.

    Sorry long post. What do people think is going here. I am thinking of withdrawing from the S 57 process because I feel she is biased and also not professional, I don't know if I can withdraw DMV start again
    Citing what had happened and how her infoatoon and approach was very different from general psycholOhy practice. Adviceuch appreciated. Really worried patent.


Comments

  • #2
    ResearchWill
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ResearchWill


    Can't give legal advice.

    I'm amazed how many indpendant professionals in family law are biased towards one party or the other.


Advertisement