Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Crossing the Atlantic

  • 09-11-2012 12:06pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 813 ✭✭✭


    Why does it take longer to fly from East to West than in the opposite direction ?

    Shannon to New York take about 7 hours: New York to Shannon takes about 6 hours.

    Probably a very simple answer...but I don't know what it is.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    Prevailing winds?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,151 ✭✭✭Ben D Bus




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 813 ✭✭✭Poulgorm


    I wonder if either of the suggested answers (prevailing winds & jet stream) is correct. Jets fly at an altitude of 33,000ft +, so the prevailing winds would not be very dense at that altitude. Also the jet streams are so narrow, planes could easily avoid them (unless they wanted to take advantage of them).

    I wonder is it something to do with the rotation of the earth (west to east).

    I am sure the pilots on here know the answer


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,151 ✭✭✭Ben D Bus


    Poulgorm wrote: »
    I wonder if either of the suggested answers (prevailing winds & jet stream) is correct. Jets fly at an altitude of 33,000ft +, so the prevailing winds would not be very dense at that altitude. Also the jet streams are so narrow, planes could easily avoid them (unless they wanted to take advantage of them).

    I wonder is it something to do with the rotation of the earth (west to east).

    I am sure the pilots on here know the answer

    From the Wiki article I quoted:
    The location of the jet stream is extremely important for aviation. Commercial use of the jet stream began on 18 November 1952, when Pan Am flew from Tokyo to Honolulu at an altitude of 7,600 metres (24,900 ft). It cut the trip time by over one-third, from 18 to 11.5 hours.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_stream#Aviation

    The rotation of the earth is one of the elements that causes the jet stream (and most weather).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    The rotation of the Earth has a direct effect on flight paths due to the Coriolis Effect, this applies equally in both directions though.

    It doesn't affect the flight time in the way that you are asking, except indirectly insofar as it is responsible for the jet stream and other weather effects.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭krd


    I've heard rocket launches are always tilted into the east (someone correct me if I'm wrong). Because the spin of the earth gives the rocket an extra kick.

    And I think the rule with orbiting space ships, is you descend directly, you need to go west to come in, and east to go out (I could have that back to front).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,143 ✭✭✭locum-motion


    krd wrote: »
    I've heard rocket launches are always tilted into the east (someone correct me if I'm wrong). Because the spin of the earth gives the rocket an extra kick.

    And I think the rule with orbiting space ships, is you descend directly, you need to go west to come in, and east to go out (I could have that back to front).

    You'd better figure it out before you try to launch your 'building crumbler"!:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 813 ✭✭✭Poulgorm


    If we had a pilot on here, I feel he would know the answer.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,372 ✭✭✭im invisible


    shur back in the tine of concorde, you could land before you had taken off....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,151 ✭✭✭Ben D Bus


    Poulgorm wrote: »
    If we had a pilot on here, I feel he would know the answer.

    Well, if you're not going to believe the answers on the science forum then ask on the aviation forum. Who knows, maybe there will be a pilot there!

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=905


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,700 ✭✭✭tricky D


    The rotation of the Earth has a direct effect on flight paths due to the Coriolis Effect, this applies equally in both directions though.

    The Coriolis Effect has only a very small effect. See your own Wiki link at Ballistic missiles and satellites section. The flight path is a Great Circle almost wholly due to the Earth's curvature.

    Poulgorm wrote: »
    If we had a pilot on here, I feel he would know the answer.

    Answer has already been given: jet stream and prevailing winds. No need to be a pilot to know that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    tricky D wrote: »
    The Coriolis Effect has only a very small effect. See your own Wiki link at Ballistic missiles and satellites section. The flight path is a Great Circle almost wholly due to the Earth's curvature.




    Answer has already been given: jet stream and prevailing winds. No need to be a pilot to know that.

    True but I was replying to the part where he said:
    I wonder is it something to do with the rotation of the earth (west to east).


Advertisement