Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The new 51st State of America

Options
«1

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    News just in, gunman opens fire in a highschool in Puerto Rico.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,850 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    That'll be some amount of money needed for flags with a 51st star


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,969 ✭✭✭hardCopy


    Larbre34 wrote: »
    That'll be some amount of money needed for flags with a 51st star

    "I'll be deep in the cold, cold ground before I recognize Missourah."

    Looks like the vote wasn't that clear: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/08/puerto-rico-state-reasons-will-not-become-51st-state_n_2095366.html#slide=1739512


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,419 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Crinklewood


    I thought we were in a state already.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,089 ✭✭✭RikkFlair


    Certain parts of Ireland could be the 52nd state, they've already like OMG totally got the accent down maaaaaaaaaan.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,473 ✭✭✭Wacker The Attacker


    Isnt this dependent on the u.s actually wanting puerto rico as a 51st state


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,646 ✭✭✭✭El Weirdo


    Do they get their own Samuel L Jackson?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 31,117 ✭✭✭✭snubbleste


    Larbre34 wrote: »
    That'll be some amount of money needed for flags with a 51st star
    I'm going to open a flag-making factory. Hopefully the government will offer me a grant for this, a grant for that and charge me 2% corporate tax.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,376 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    I think it's dependent on whether congress or the senate or whatever approves.


  • Registered Users Posts: 420 ✭✭Green Diesel


    Isnt this dependent on the u.s actually wanting puerto rico as a 51st state

    Yes, but they have never refused accession to their territory before, and Peurto Ricans already have US citizenship (since 1917).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    Anyone notice in the Sun link, one of the photos has a guy holding a flag with "Proud To Be An American" and a picture of Ferris Bueller on it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,075 ✭✭✭Rasmus


    Isnt this dependent on the u.s actually wanting puerto rico as a 51st state

    No, it is dependant on whether PR wants to become a fully fledged state of the U.S.


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Rasmus wrote: »
    No, it is dependant on whether PR wants to become a fully fledged state of the U.S.
    It actually needs to be approved by congress, or the senate, or maybe both, and the president.

    After all, we could vote to become a protectorate of France tomorrow, but France don't have to accept it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,753 ✭✭✭davet82


    is there any other country that has a relationship like this with the US?

    first time i've ever heard of this


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,850 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Yeah that movie, and all the people who use the phrase 51st state to describe Britain or Ireland will have to change things in their lives. Ha ha.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,075 ✭✭✭Rasmus


    seamus wrote: »
    It actually needs to be approved by congress, or the senate, or maybe both, and the president.

    After all, we could vote to become a protectorate of France tomorrow, but France don't have to accept it.

    Ultimately, of course. Which is a while off. I don't think that was actually the question though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,753 ✭✭✭davet82


    seamus wrote: »
    It actually needs to be approved by congress, or the senate, or maybe both, and the president.

    After all, we could vote to become a protectorate of France tomorrow, but France don't have to accept it.

    From what i gather from the articles i've read indicates its a green light if the overwhelming majority show to be in favour of joining the union.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,075 ✭✭✭Rasmus


    davet82 wrote: »
    is there any other country that has a relationship like this with the US?

    first time i've ever heard of this

    Most similar would be Guam


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,131 ✭✭✭Azure_sky


    Yeah that's all we need. Over 50% of the population believing the world is less than 6,000 years old and more corporate welfare.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,183 ✭✭✭✭Dodge


    davet82 wrote: »
    is there any other country that has a relationship like this with the US?

    first time i've ever heard of this

    THere's a few like Guam, American Samoa and US Virgin islands. All in various states (if you'll pardon the pun) of US depndency/ownership


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,969 ✭✭✭hardCopy


    seamus wrote: »
    It actually needs to be approved by congress, or the senate, or maybe both, and the president.

    After all, we could vote to become a protectorate of France tomorrow, but France don't have to accept it.

    Don't be absurd.

    We'd clearly have to join Brazil.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,183 ✭✭✭✭Dodge


    The bits and pieces I've read from the US side seem to show that Republicans aren't overly enthused about what they see as a clearly democrat leaning state being admitted to presidential elections

    As of now they can't vote in Presidential elections (but they do participate in the primaries)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,753 ✭✭✭davet82


    Dodge wrote: »
    The bits and pieces I've read from the US side seem to show that Republicans aren't overly enthused about what they see as a clearly democrat leaning state being admitted to presidential elections

    As of now they can't vote in Presidential elections (but they do participate in the primaries)

    they'd probably be only worth 4 electoral votes anyways


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    davet82 wrote: »
    From what i gather from the articles i've read indicates its a green light if the overwhelming majority show to be in favour of joining the union.
    Well it appears to be up in the air. It's a non-binding referendum, which means that the government are not obliged to do anything about the result, a straw poll if you will. They can present this to the US government, who can accept it. But it's a bit flimsy.

    It doesn't mean though that the outcome is invalid. Actual majority in such instances is rarely required - the Irish Constitution for example, was only approved by 39% of the electorate.

    The most likely outcome though is that the US government will probably send PR back to take a binding referendum, on a day when they're not voting on anything else.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,183 ✭✭✭✭Dodge


    davet82 wrote: »
    they'd probably be only worth 4 electoral votes anyways

    It'd 7 (if they added new votes) as their population would make them in the top 30 most pupulated states. And they'd have new congressmen and senators too. At the moment loal politicians are in Puerto Rico specific parties.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,753 ✭✭✭davet82


    Dodge wrote: »
    It'd 7 (if they added new votes) as their population would make them in the top 30 most pupulated states. And they'd have new congressmen and senators too. At the moment loal politicians are in Puerto Rico specific parties.

    top 30, who'd have thought

    i guess them being accepted into the union would be depending on which party is in power at the time then


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,978 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Judging by the number of people who can't spell programme we already are the 51st state.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,183 ✭✭✭✭Dodge


    davet82 wrote: »
    top 30, who'd have thought

    i guess them being accepted into the union would be depending on which party is in power at the time then

    Maybe, but I don't think they could get away with "they're the other side" being the reason to say no. I'd expect them to use economic and maybe even social reasons ("they don't speak English!" etc)

    Interesting to see how it develops


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,262 ✭✭✭✭jester77


    I thought I read that too many people intentionally didn't vote on this to make it official and that the %'s being quoted are only based on those that did vote.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭Remmy


    Oh no they didn't *clicks fingers and moves head from side to side.


Advertisement