Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Alan Shatter

  • 08-11-2012 5:57pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,224 ✭✭✭


    Now that I have your attention :D

    Shatter's Family Law states that a maintenance defaulter can be imprisoned for up to three months (I think for contempt). Unhelpfully Mr Shatter did not footnote this - anyone any idea under what legislation.

    Thanks in advance!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,577 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    anyone any idea under what legislation.

    It hasn't been passed yet. ;)

    Joking!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,978 ✭✭✭445279.ie


    Section 31 Civil Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2011

    http://www.oireachtas.ie/documents/bills28/acts/2011/a2311.pdf


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭krd


    Shatter's Family Law states that a maintenance defaulter can be imprisoned for up to three months (I think for contempt).

    Where did he get this idea?........This is one of the things they use in the US for banging people up.

    Under current law, if the judge makes an order to pay maintenance, and it's defaulted on. Can't the judge already imprison the defaulter for contempt. If the judge believes the defaulter is doing a Quinn?

    As I understand it, under existing law, wages can be garnished etc. Though if someone cannot pay, they cannot pay.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,224 ✭✭✭Procrastastudy


    krd wrote: »
    Where did he get this idea?........This is one of the things they use in the US for banging people up.

    Under current law, if the judge makes an order to pay maintenance, and it's defaulted on. Can't the judge already imprison the defaulter for contempt. If the judge believes the defaulter is doing a Quinn?

    As I understand it, under existing law, wages can be garnished etc. Though if someone cannot pay, they cannot pay.

    It has me all confused (not difficult tbh) because it doesn't refer to the sentence possible in the legislation it just says "deal with the matter accordingly" and for some reason the District Court is allowed to hand out penalties as if it were the High Court (which is a bit bloody odd imho)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭krd


    It has me all confused (not difficult tbh) because it doesn't refer to the sentence possible in the legislation it just says "deal with the matter accordingly" and for some reason the District Court is allowed to hand out penalties as if it were the High Court (which is a bit bloody odd imho)


    It really sounds like the American thing. They lock up "dead beat dads" for not paying maintenance. ....And it's just a happy coincidence that many of these "dead beat dads" are poor and black.

    I knew someone whose daughter was a special "dead beat dad" probation officer/cop. She took a man, who couldn't pay his maintenance because he was terminally ill, and on a ventilator, and threw him in jail - the county went to extreme expense of having a ventilator and an operator carted into jail with him - to be humane and all.

    It was only a matter of time before Alan and his friends, got working on their "final solution" for the working class people.




    I don't know about you....But I'll never let them take me alive.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement