Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Sig. figs. and ratios

  • 06-11-2012 7:37am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,753 ✭✭✭


    I've recently returned to learning and I'm struggling with a question and hope someone can give me a bit of guidance!

    If you're asked to give a ratio as a whole number and to 2 sig figs, would this be the way to do it??

    eg 32 : 1550

    = 32/1550

    = 0.020645

    = 2 x 10^2



    So is 2 x 10^2 the answer or should the answer be 1 : 2 x 10^2




    Any advice appreciated! :)


Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 1,852 Mod ✭✭✭✭Michael Collins


    Your instructions seem odd! You are asked to give a ratio e.g.

    32:1550

    as a "whole number", which means the natural numbers (or integers) like 0, 1, 2 or 3 etc,

    then you are asked to give it to two significant digits, which is kind of odd, in this case it would mean

    32:1550 = 0.020645 etc

    to 2 significant digits this is

    0.021

    since leading zeros are not considered "significant digits", and the 6 after the 0.020 above means the trucated decimal is closer to 0.021 than to 0.020.

    But neither of these are whole numbers, the nearest "whole" number is 0, and to two significant digits this is

    0.00

    I suspect they did not really mean "whole numbers" but actually just wanted you to convert a ratio to a decimal form, in which case the answer is

    0.021

    or in scientific notation

    [latex] 2.1\times 10^{-2} [/latex].

    Note the -2 exponent!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,753 ✭✭✭sudzs



    or in scientific notation

    [latex] 2.1\times 10^{-2} [/latex].

    Note the -2 exponent!

    Thanks for the reply.

    I was so busy trying to remember the ALT thingy for an exponent i forgot the minus!! :D

    I did it as above in the end, and also put in the 1 : for the ratio bit.... explaining that it was the ratio between 2 types of molecules. Would that be right?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 1,852 Mod ✭✭✭✭Michael Collins


    There's no point in expressing it as a ratio again by putting in the 'one'.The whole point is you've converted it from a ratio (basically a fraction) to a decimal, if you insist on putting it as a ratio, it would go after the number, not before. That is

    0.021:1

    But you'd never do that. Ever!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,753 ✭✭✭sudzs


    There's no point in expressing it as a ratio again by putting in the 'one'.The whole point is you've converted it from a ratio (basically a fraction) to a decimal, if you insist on putting it as a ratio, it would go after the number, not before. That is

    0.021:1

    But you'd never do that. Ever!

    crap.... I think I got it backwards.... and I forgot the minus. :(


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 1,852 Mod ✭✭✭✭Michael Collins


    sudzs wrote: »
    crap.... I think I got it backwards.... and I forgot the minus. :(

    We all make mistakes when learning something new. Not to worry. Learn and improve etc.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement