Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Differentiate y=x^y

  • 19-10-2012 5:22am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 49


    What's the derivative of [latex]y = x^y[/latex] ?

    I tried implicit differentiation and got:

    [latex]y' = y'yx^{(y-1)}[/latex]

    which doesn't make sense unless y' = 0 or infinity.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 49 Snotzenfartz


    Taking logs and differentiating i get:

    [latex]logy = ylogx[/latex]

    [latex]y'/y = y/x + y'logx[/latex]

    Solving for y' gives:

    [latex]y' = y^2 / (x - xylogx)[/latex]

    Is this right?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,141 ✭✭✭Yakuza


    How can something be a function of itself? Of course, after what happened with the "sum to infinity of 1+2+4+8... being equal to -1" thread, I'm prepared to be corrected, but a function (not equation) whose output variable (I can't remember the fancy mathsy term for this so I've substituted a computer science one) exists on the LHS and RHS makes no sense to me at all, as you get into recursion etc. Here, there be dragons!

    Edit : The "mathsy" term i was looking for was "dependent variable"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 49 Snotzenfartz


    I've been trying to differentiate the function,

    [latex]y=x^{x^{x^{x^{.^{.^{.}}}}}}[/latex]

    If you raise x to the power of each side it obviously doesn't change the function since there are infinitely many x's already. So we can implicitly define the function as,

    [latex]y=x^y[/latex]

    It's a bit sneaky but nothing paradoxical. :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,141 ✭✭✭Yakuza


    Barring the special cases of x=0 and x=1, anything else raised to itself (infinitely many times) is pretty much going to snap right to zero (for 0<abs(x)<1) or infinity (abs(x)>1) (straight away, rendering a derivative (in terms of a rate of change or the slope of the line at that point) fairly meaningless, no?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11 Splagmata


    Nah, you're thinking of,

    [latex]y = ((((((x^x)^x)^x)^.)^.)^.[/latex]

    Which would have the implicit definition,

    [latex]y=y^x[/latex]


  • Advertisement
Advertisement