Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Liberal Arts Survivors' Thread

  • 07-10-2012 9:55pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭


    Had the misfortune of catching this absolute piece of **** over the weekend. How I Met Your Mother star Josh Radnor writes, directs, produces and stars in one of the worst films you'll see all year. The protagonist is a goody-two-shoes/insufferable git; the central "growing older" theme is hammered home with a sledge; the performances are **** (Elizabeth Olsen excepted); and the whole thing comes off like Radnor composing a love-letter to himself.

    If you've not seen it, swerve it. If you have, then unleash the hate below. And if you actually liked it, tell me why...


Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,019 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    I'm normally reluctant to use the word 'pretentious', but I had to make an exception with this film. It's so sure of its own intelligence, but there's really nothing to it. They can talk about Infinite Jest in vague generalities all they want (why did they never mention the book name? Seemed odd. Same with Twilight stuff), but everything is lacking in anything approaching insight, intellectual or otherwise. Some truly cringeworthy moments, like the letter writing montage. Barely anyone in this film resembles genuine human beings, despite the efforts of Olsen - who is easily the strongest link - Jenkins and Janney.

    That said - and this is faint praise - there are some funny moments. I liked the scene with the 'pros and cons' list particularly. Perhaps I was just more forgiving of the small handful of scenes that weren't quite so achingly bland or insufferably twee.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭Kinski


    I'm normally reluctant to use the word 'pretentious', but I had to make an exception with this film. It's so sure of its own intelligence, but there's really nothing to it. They can talk about Infinite Jest in vague generalities all they want (why did they never mention the book name? Seemed odd. Same with Twilight stuff), but everything is lacking in anything approaching insight, intellectual or otherwise. Some truly cringeworthy moments, like the letter writing montage. Barely anyone in this film resembles genuine human beings, despite the efforts of Olsen - who is easily the strongest link - Jenkins and Janney.

    That said - and this is faint praise - there are some funny moments. I liked the scene with the 'pros and cons' list particularly. Perhaps I was just more forgiving of the small handful of scenes that weren't quite so achingly bland or insufferably twee.

    It was pretentious in an odd way, like it wanted to position itself as a film for lovers of more esoteric, more 'highbrow' cultural artefacts, but at the same time feared that alienating any of its viewers with talk of obscure or difficult books or music would undermine its gestures towards the universal theme of growing older.

    For instance, that horrid letter-writing sequence is largely about the mixtape of music which the Olsen character had recently 'discovered,' and was introducing her new friend to. Yet the soundtrack played one of the most famous pieces of classical music ever composed, one we all probably heard before we turned 10, and which I doubt anyone has any trouble appreciating. And that's the thing about classical music: pretty much everyone likes Beethoven, or at least the famous bits.

    A more credible scenario could have seen them bond through a shared love of some obscure composer who wrote self-consciously 'difficult' music...but that would have run the risk of turning off the viewer, since most would not enjoy such music.

    The film was setting itself up in such a way that it needed to perform a difficult balancing act, keeping fans of David Foster Wallace AND fans of Twilight books onside, but its solution was simply a cop-out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,544 ✭✭✭marwelie


    Well I thought it was great ;P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,721 ✭✭✭Otacon


    I went to see this last weekend and thought it was good. Elisabeth Olsen and Richard Jenkins were very good, and there were a few laughs too.

    Not sure it needs a 'survivor's thread' tbh.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭Kinski


    Actually I should have spared Jenkins in my earlier posts; he was (and is always, from what I've seen) good. But I stand by the survivors' thread.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,804 ✭✭✭delbertgrady


    Jesus. I've not seen it, but it must be truly horrendous if the trio of Elizabeth Olsen, the fabulous Allison Janney and the always-reliable Richard Jenkins can't salvage it. I almost want to see it now. :rolleyes:

    2024 Gigs and Events: David Suchet, Depeche Mode, Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark, The Smile, Pixies, Liam Gallagher John Squire/Jake Bugg, Kacey Musgraves (x2), Olivia Rodrigo, Mitski, Muireann Bradley, Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band, Eric Clapton, Girls Aloud, Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band, Rewind Festival, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Henry Winkler, P!nk, Pearl Jam/Richard Ashcroft, Taylor Swift/Paramore, Suede/Manic Street Preachers, Muireann Bradley, AC/DC, Deacon Blue/Altered Images, The The, blink-182, Coldplay, Gilbert O'Sullivan, Nick Lowe, David Gilmour, ABBA Voyage, St. Vincent, Public Service Broadcasting, Crash Test Dummies, Cassandra Jenkins.

    2025 Gigs and Events: Stuart Murdoch, Lyle Lovett, The Corrs/Imelda May/Natalie Imbruglia, Olivia Rodrigo, Iron Maiden, Dua Lipa, Lana Del Rey, Weezer, Maya Hawke, Billie Eilish (x2), Oasis, Sharon Van Etten, The Human League, Deacon Blue



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,225 ✭✭✭snausages


    I haven't even heard of it but from what I gather it's a movie about David Foster Walrus, hipsters and other pretentious pap?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,019 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    snausages wrote: »
    I haven't even heard of it but from what I gather it's a movie about David Foster Walrus, hipsters and other pretentious pap?

    I wish. If the characters actually illustrated a capacity to discuss David Foster Wallace novels or classical music intelligently and in depth, then this would have been a more convincing film. Instead, the most insightful observations boil down to the fact that Infinite Jest is long and the author committed suicide.

    This is a film about clueless people feigning intelligence and insight, yet is done without irony or self-awareness.


Advertisement