Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

New Heterodontosaurid

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Damn Sereno always finding crazy stuff like this! I bet he sold his soul to the Devil or something. Still waiting for that "digging raptor" of his.

    The creature is amazing, BTW. Living proof that you don´t need to be large or carnivorous to be a scary dino:
    o-DRACULA-DINOSAUR-570.jpg?6


  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,627 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    That is one crazy dino.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    A lot of media outlets are describing it as 'vampire like'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Didn´t vampires had their big fangs on the upper jaw. tho? :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 714 ✭✭✭Ziphius


    From todays Irish Time:

    "A US-based palaeontologist who discovered a new type of dinosaur in a piece of South African rock in 1983 has left it 29 years to tell the world about his find because he got sidetracked by other projects."
    Maybe we'll have to wait a while for that digging raptor :(

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2012/1005/breaking11.html


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Adam Khor wrote: »
    Didn´t vampires had their big fangs on the upper jaw. tho? :pac:

    I'm pretty sure they didn't have beaks either.
    I also find it concerning how we are referring to vampires in the past tense...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Galvasean wrote: »
    I'm pretty sure they didn't have beaks either.
    I also find it concerning how we are referring to vampires in the past tense...

    Well, I have never seen one around so they must be extinct XD


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,024 ✭✭✭Owryan


    Galvasean wrote: »
    I'm pretty sure they didn't have beaks either.
    I also find it concerning how we are referring to vampires in the past tense...

    Buffy killed them all, besides after "twilight" no one could admit to being a vamp !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 95,925 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Adam Khor wrote: »
    Well, I have never seen one around so they must be extinct XD
    and vampire bats are just convergent evolution ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    and vampire bats are just convergent evolution ?

    Probably the ones that outcompeted them :pac:


  • Advertisement
Advertisement