Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Intel Burn Test help

  • 17-09-2012 03:26PM
    #1
    tuxy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,983 ✭✭✭✭


    Do you guys think intel burn test is a good way to measure a systems stability?. I have been running a 2500k @ 4.5 ghz with 1.375 vcore for almost a year now.
    I tested it prime stable for 24 hours at the time.

    Now I'm trying intel burn test and am shocked to see how much stress this can put on a system. It passes on standard and high but fails very high and maxium.

    It's much more stress than the system would realistically be put under in day to day use. If I drop back to 4.4 Ghz and slightly raise vcore I can pass intel burn test on maximum.

    What's the general consensus , is IBT on maximum an essential stability test?


Comments

  • #2
    Solitaire
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 18,381 Mod ✭✭✭✭Solitaire


    Its necessary if you desire great e-peen.

    IBT on short runs is great for snap testing of an OCd system you're changing constantly but once you've locked in desired settings a good 6-24 hour prime burn is still considered the best stress test for a system that's going to be used as an actual PC rather than just a testbench; IBT isn't really a very realistic test, as it effectively exploits weaknesses in the CPU core itself to try and force a fail condition.


Advertisement