Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Birefringence

  • 31-08-2012 1:29pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 162 ✭✭


    Have any of you seen this video?



    Refraction, eat your heart out!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 179 ✭✭Neodymium


    I was just after watching it, I guess you're subscribed to sixtysymbols too :)

    All the science videos from the University of Nottingham's youtube channels are superb. I've watched nearly all of the sixtysymbols/ periodicvideos/ numberphile/ deepsky videos.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 162 ✭✭mathstalk


    Neodymium wrote: »
    I was just after watching it, I guess you're subscribed to sixtysymbols too :)

    All the science videos from the University of Nottingham's youtube channels are superb. I've watched nearly all of the sixtysymbols/ periodicvideos/ numberphile/ deepsky videos.

    I am indeed! The videos are really great. I respect them a lot for making the subjects interesting through the way they present them. Other university videos are informative and sometimes interesting, but they lack the enthusiasm and effort that Nottingham Uni put into theirs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,616 ✭✭✭FISMA


    Although not birefringence, I have always appreciated the explanations I have heard in explaining the below observation;)
    carbdiox.jpg
    1116e9de94.gif


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭krd


    FISMA wrote: »
    Although not birefringence, I have always appreciated the explanations I have heard in explaining the below observation;)

    Although not directly related to either birefringence, or that weird symmetry in the word dioxide.

    Something I've been looking at

    http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/93/is-there-a-physical-reason-we-read-from-left-to-right

    http://traevoli.com/boust/select_file.php

    I've been looking at it, because I am dyslexic. Though as an adult, I have mostly overcome it, I still have problems. I have a pet theory, that if I learn to, and practice, reading upside down, and back to front, it may improve my general reading and maths. It's interesting to do. You get a reminder of how difficult it was to learn to read as a child - for me it was especially difficult.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,001 ✭✭✭✭opinion guy


    Birefringence was always my favourite physical property :)


  • Advertisement
Advertisement