Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Retrofitting to Passive Standards

  • 10-08-2012 9:55am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16


    Hi All,

    Just wondering if anyone has any experience in retrofit projects to a Passive standard (or close enough to it)?? Would there be any builders/contractors you'd recommend??

    I'm starting a project soon where i'll be keeping the foundations and 3 solid stone walls of an existing house and raising the roof up 1/2 a storey and then trying to get it close to passive standard....maybe i'm too ambitious??? Flattening the existing bungalow (from the 1960's) and starting again might be a better option?? I'm open to any and all suggestions....


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,282 ✭✭✭sas




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,748 ✭✭✭Do-more


    rooster108 wrote: »
    Flattening the existing bungalow (from the 1960's) and starting again might be a better option?? I'm open to any and all suggestions....

    From following various builds and comments from people like beyondpassive who posts on here it appears that renovation costs to passive standard are very similar to new build costs, but with a renovation you end up making compromises you don't have to accept with a new build.

    Unless the building is listed or holds some particular importance to you then I think you will probably find that knocking it and starting fresh is going to be the better solution with little or no financial penalty.

    invest4deepvalue.com



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16 rooster108


    Excellent piece and exactly what i was looking for!! many thanks!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 63 ✭✭BobMcBob


    Do-more wrote: »
    rooster108 wrote: »
    Flattening the existing bungalow (from the 1960's) and starting again might be a better option?? I'm open to any and all suggestions....

    From following various builds and comments from people like beyondpassive who posts on here it appears that renovation costs to passive standard are very similar to new build costs, but with a renovation you end up making compromises you don't have to accept with a new build.

    Unless the building is listed or holds some particular importance to you then I think you will probably find that knocking it and starting fresh is going to be the better solution with little or no financial penalty.

    In similar situation ourselves, just met architects last few weeks. Knocking was the concensus from everyone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,046 ✭✭✭archtech


    While knocking the house and starting afresh is properly the simplest solution in terms of cost, other issues should be considered. A new dwelling will most properly require by the planning authority a new treatment/ percolation area, irrespective of the condition/workings of the existing one, furthermore the planning authority could insist on achieving the current sight line standards as set out in their development plan for a new/replacement dwelling . These may or may not be issues, but just something that requires consideration.

    Personally I don't think its over ambitious to aim for passive or near passive standard in a substantial refurbishment/alteration project, yes at times it can be challenging but new builds can be too.

    Many architects and professionals will tell you its easier to start afresh, because, very few have, yet, developed the skillset in retrofit construction to the standards required.

    While most of us haven't yet got to the stage of considering life cycle costings, embedded energy / zero carbon construction or energy consumed in constructing a low energy build, retaining an existing structure or part structure would normally assist these areas. Something that's going to become a bigger issue in the future.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15 afinador


    Hi All...I'm new to Boards, and don't know if this thread has long been dead, but we're just about to start retrofitting a 70's semi-d to Passive standard. Planning in place, and ready to start works in about 3 weeks (yikes!)

    Fairly obviously some serious knowledge on this site...Rooster108, did you knock or retrofit? How did it work out for you?


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 10,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭BryanF


    afinador wrote: »
    Hi All...I'm new to Boards, and don't know if this thread has long been dead, but we're just about to start retrofitting a 70's semi-d to Passive standard. Planning in place, and ready to start works in about 3 weeks (yikes!)

    Fairly obviously some serious knowledge on this site...Rooster108, did you knock or retrofit? How did it work out for you?

    You say planning is in place - do you mean the phpp calc, tender drawings, thermal analysis and spec are done, prices in and contractors prices checked ?How have you managed the 1ach/hr in te contract - it can be a difficult clause for a build to commit to in a retro-fit


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15 afinador


    Yes to all of the above planning questions. Single contractor who 'gets' the passiv standards and sees it as good thing to be involved with for the future of his business. Lots of detail from the architect, and a commitment from the contractor that he's responsible for meeting the standards/passing the tests during the build. Still learning a lot about the process, and don't know what the 1ach/hr ratio refers to


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15 afinador


    ...air change/hour. My understanding is that once we achieve airtightness to the required standard then the HRV unit will control ach/hr ratio. Have budgeted for 3 blower tests.

    Any advice on space heating? At this stage we're plumbing for an airto water heat pump, but they seem to have high running costs, and are expensive to buy. Lots of horror stories about wood pellets, so not keen. A HRV unit with a heating element fitted maybe? we're facing due south, and will have a lot of glass on south face, so don't anticipate a big need for additional space heat


Advertisement