Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Wargaming buy BigWorld for $45m

Options

Comments

  • Options
    #2
    Aenaes
    Registered Users Posts: 1,677 ✭✭✭Aenaes


    This is good news, yeah? They now can improve the game engine to suit their own titles.


  • Options
    #3
    kingtiger
    Registered Users Posts: 1,740 ✭✭✭kingtiger


    tis good news alright, I am just wishing for multi core support and bigger maps


  • Options
    #4
    Spear
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 25,151 CMod ✭✭✭✭Spear


    It certainly means that Wargaming can dictate the future of BigWorld to suit their needs first and foremost. Though it'll take quite a while before it pays off.


  • Options
    #5
    Manic Moran
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,272 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    kingtiger wrote: »
    tis good news alright, I am just wishing for multi core support and bigger maps

    Multi-core is coming, and fairly soon.


  • Options
    #6
    kingtiger
    Registered Users Posts: 1,740 ✭✭✭kingtiger


    Manic Moran wrote: »
    Multi-core is coming, and fairly soon.

    waiting for it since closed beta so have grown weary of WGs promises, so hope you don't mind me taking that with a pinch of salt


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #7
    CruelCoin
    Registered Users Posts: 4,468 ✭✭✭CruelCoin


    kingtiger wrote: »
    tis good news alright, I am just wishing for multi core support and bigger maps

    Aye,

    Maps like Malinovka where you start more or less already in contact with the enemy are way too small.

    I'm also love support for larger battles. I.e: 20 vs 20 or 30 vs 30.

    That would go some way to evening out the matchmaking, and making it less likely that entire teams will be comprised of failbots.

    I dream of a day where no more will i kill 6 tanks and still lose.


  • Options
    #8
    CruelCoin
    Registered Users Posts: 4,468 ✭✭✭CruelCoin


    kingtiger wrote: »
    waiting for it since closed beta so have grown weary of WGs promises, so hope you don't mind me taking that with a pinch of salt

    Multicore isn't going to be making any real difference to how the game performs.

    Running a i7 @ 3.2ghtz and one core has me with all settings maxed out.....

    Improving graphics would in my mind pay more dividends.

    Even max settings with improved graphics turned on at 65fps, the game still looks quite shoddy.


Advertisement