Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

infra red conversion...

  • 31-07-2012 1:41pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 ✭✭✭


    There was a company in cork offering permanent conversions on cameras to infra red, but for the life of me I cant remember who it was, or any other options ?


Comments

  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭melekalikimaka


    diy is pretty sinples, some cameras are alot better suited than others tho, a cheap d50 works a treat by all accounts, its a pretty simple process from my wee research into it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 ✭✭✭sunny2004


    Cheers, but I am not sure I am up to doing it myself... then again, who knows lol


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭melekalikimaka


    http://www.advancedcameraservices.co.uk/Specialist_UV_IR_cameras/IR.htm

    uk company prices, ridiculous, maybe get a few people in on it and do it yourselves, I'm half tempted...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 ✭✭✭sunny2004


    I am understandign the process correctly, they are putting a filter into the camera body ?

    As in just replacing the use of an external filter ?
    or am I getting this wrong ???


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭melekalikimaka


    need filter too


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 ✭✭✭sunny2004


    ok, they remove the filter that blocks IR from inside the camera ?
    MAking the exposures shorter ?
    am I on the right path here ?


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭melekalikimaka


    sunny2004 wrote: »
    ok, they remove the filter that blocks IR from inside the camera ?
    MAking the exposures shorter ?
    am I on the right path here ?

    yup in a nut shell, gives you closer to normal exposure times. I think...


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 9,047 CMod ✭✭✭✭CabanSail


    They remove the IR filter over the Sensor. They then replace this with either a different filter (allowing more IR but reducing visible light) or a piece of glass which allows the full spectrum to pass.

    The shots with the filter come out looking like monochrome. The full spectrum ones have colour data. I think you can then put the IR filter on the lens to get the classic look.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 ✭✭✭sunny2004


    Its the classic black and white I am after..
    I like the idea of having shorter exposures..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,792 ✭✭✭zerohamster


    Just a few things to note with IR conversions.

    1. You have to replace the glass filter with another of the same thickness
    (some models have a thicker /thinner low pass filter) whether you are replacing it will a full spectrum filter or visible light blocking filter (the latter for IR conversion).
    If the filter was simply removed then the light would not be focused on the sensor correctly which is why you must get the same thickness.

    2. Shots will not come out black and white, they will be various shades of red with the visible light blocking filter if you have a visible light blocking filter that lets only IR in.
    The full spectrum filter will take shots as normal but with an odd magenta tint and other effects to objects giving out a lot of IR light so you would need to use the respective filter on a lens to get either IR or normal visible light shots where AF would not work for IR.
    The shot will mainly be in the red channel but also some in blue and green with a visible light blocking filter as the red channel is closest in wavelength to IR.
    There is a good amount of processing involved (well some) for IR shots but you can also of course select custom WB or just select the B&W mode in the camera if you don't want to do much on the pp side of things.

    3. Shots will have a slightly longer duration than they would with a normal visible light shot but you will be able to take photos handheld for the most part and the camera will meter correctly when the filter is one that replaces the low pass filter.

    4. If replacing the low pass filter AF will work but as there is no filter over the AF sensor it will be focusing on the visible light focus point and not the IR one. The AF would not however work if there was a lens filter instead of the sensor based filter.
    Some lenses have an IR focus point marked but most don't as this was for the use of IR film.
    Some places will not change AF to be accurate to the new focus point and others will.
    The focus calibration requires either shimming the sensor/AF sensor or software telling AF to compensate, either way stopping the lens down or finding the lens IR focussing point will remedy this if using manual focus compensation after AF has done it's job.

    I can give you more details on the conversion and may be able to help you also.
    What model camera do you want to convert?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 ✭✭✭sunny2004


    Cheers man, will drop you a pm..


Advertisement