Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Laws on salmon fishing. Is this a loop hole

  • 29-07-2012 08:01PM
    #1
    keyser2012
    Closed Accounts Posts: 57 ✭✭


    A friend of mine has been telling me that his cousin was caught by a baillif fishing with a bow and arrow and when he was caught, he was bringing in a salmon. The guy in question went to court and the judge threw it out because it isnt in the law that you cant take salmon from a river with one of these. Im calling this BS but this guy isnt one for telling stories so im just curious to know would this be true or not


Comments

  • #2
    antoswords
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 139 ✭✭antoswords


    Just waiting for an avalanche of fish puns to follow.......

    I'll get it started. Sounds like your friend is talking a load of Pollocks.


  • #3
    keyser2012
    Closed Accounts Posts: 57 ✭✭keyser2012


    antoswords wrote: »
    Just waiting for an avalanche of fish puns to follow.......

    I'll get it started. Sounds like your friend is talking a load of Pollocks.



    LOL, good one,lol. He also said it was in the local paper so hes going to try and find a link for me so i can read it, ill post here when i get it


  • #4
    exador
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 661 ✭✭✭exador


    sounds a bit fishy.


  • #5
    ytpe2r5bxkn0c1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    Did he tell the Trout, the whole Trout and nothing but the Trout?:)


  • #6
    Zzippy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,166 ✭✭✭✭Zzippy


    The only legal method to catch freshwater fish is by rod and line (Control of Fishing for Coarse Fish in Fresh Water Bye-law No. 595, 1977.).

    Bye-law title refers to coarse fish but this bye-law applies to fishing for all fish in fresh water.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    8k2q1gfcz9s5d4
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,616 ✭✭✭8k2q1gfcz9s5d4


    Its a cock and bull story.


  • #8
    jkchambers
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 380 ✭✭jkchambers


    Was it IFI that took him to court or a waterkeeper from the local club ? If it was IFI they should have had the fisheries inspector present and he should have know this bye law and pointed it out to the solicitor/barrister so that he could point it out to the judge. In fact, when the case was brought before the judge the prosecution documents should have quoted the act or bye laws that were broken


  • #9
    Bizzum
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,034 ✭✭✭Bizzum


    jkchambers wrote: »
    If it was IFI they should have had the fisheries inspector present and he should have know this bye law and pointed it out to the solicitor/barrister so that he could point it out to the judge.

    It doesn't work like this at all.
    When a decision is made to persue a case, typically the case would be put to the solicitor well in advance of the court hearing, by the Insp/Fishery Officer.
    The defendant would be charged with the offence/s long before arriving up the steps!

    Zzippy is correct to point out Bye law No. 595, 1977.
    However there are many reasons why a case can be thrown out of court, so such a case could have be thrown out but not for the reason given by the OP.


  • #10
    jkchambers
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 380 ✭✭jkchambers


    Bizzum wrote: »
    It doesn't work like this at all.
    When a decision is made to persue a case, typically the case would be put to the solicitor well in advance of the court hearing, by the Insp/Fishery Officer.
    The defendant would be charged with the offence/s long before arriving up the steps!

    Zzippy is correct to point out Bye law No. 595, 1977.
    However there are many reasons why a case can be thrown out of court, so such a case could have be thrown out but not for the reason given by the OP.
    I did point out in the second half of my post that the law that was broken would have been in the prosecution documents. These would include the summons issued to the defendant. I agree that there must be more to this case. I will make some calls to see whether this case was actually taken by IFI.


Advertisement