Sherrif Joe Arpaio press conference live stream.

Daithi 1

Live stream, starts in a few mins, I think. For those who dare to care...

In relation to the legitimacy or lack of, of Omaba's birthcert.

http://www.ustream.tv/WND

humanji

Did anything come of this, or was he just repeating everything he's said before?

hooradiation

humanji wrote: »

Did anything come of this, or was he just repeating everything he's said before?

I'm just wondering what catastrofuck that horrible shit is trying to deflect attention away from this time.

I'm not aware of anything new in the ongoing smacking down the federal government is set on doing to his innate awfulness... maybe he's just worried people aren't paying him any attention?

Daithi 1

humanji wrote: »

Did anything come of this, or was he just repeating everything he's said before?

Check for yourself. Evidence appears to be pretty damning.

Course no-one wants to consider it because Joe is a bad man.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6Ngv16UQAA

PHOENIX (AP) — Investigators for an Arizona sheriff's volunteer posse have declared that President Barack Obama's birth certificate is definitely fraudulent.

Members of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio's posse said in March that there was probable cause that Obama's long-form birth certificate released by the White House in April 2011 was a computer-generated forgery.

Now, Arpaio says investigators are positive it's fraudulent.

Mike Zullo, the posse's chief investigator, said numeric codes on certain parts of the birth certificate indicate that those parts weren't filled out, yet those sections asking for the race of Obama's father and his field of work or study were completed.

Zullo said investigators previously didn't know the meaning of codes but they were explained by a 95-year-old former state worker who signed the president's birth certificate. Zullo said a writer who published a book about Obama's birth certificate and was aiding investigators let them listen in on an interview he conducted of the former state worker.

The Obama campaign declined to comment on Arpaio's allegations.

The Arizona Democratic Party said in a statement that Arpaio's investigation is intended to draw attention away from problems within his own agency, such as hundreds of sex-crime cases that the sheriff's office failed to adequately investigate over a three-year period.

So-called "birthers" maintain Obama is ineligible to be president because, they contend, he was born in Kenya.

Hawaii officials have repeatedly confirmed Obama's citizenship, and state officials did again Tuesday.

"President Obama was born in Honolulu and his birth certificate is valid," Joshua A. Wisch, a special assistant to Hawaii's attorney general, said in a statement. "Regarding the latest allegations from a sheriff in Arizona, they are untrue, misinformed, and misconstrue Hawaii law."

Wisch also said that "not only are Hawaii's vital records some of the best managed, but they also have some of the strongest restrictions on access to prevent identity theft and fraud."

Obama released a copy of his long-form birth certificate in an attempt to quell citizenship questions.

Courts have rebuffed lawsuits over the issue.

http://news.yahoo.com/ariz-sheriff-says-obama-birth-certificate-fake-072751943.html

hooradiation

Daithi 1 wrote: »

Check for yourself. Evidence appears to be pretty damning.

Course no-one wants to consider it because Joe is a bad man.

If they have such "damning evidence", (and it's not) then Joe would be obliged to, at the very least, bring a legal challenge forward on the subject of the presidents eligibility
Watch this space as this doesn't happen (or at the very best gets drummed straight out of court for being horseshit)

Why, because the only reason Mr Arpaio is pandering to this awful nonsense is to, as pointed out by the Arizona democratic party "draw attention away from problems within his own agency, such as hundreds of sex-crime cases that the sheriff's office failed to adequately investigate over a three-year period."

He's a shit, this is a crass stunt, let's not dignify this nonsense.

Daithi 1

hooradiation wrote: »

Daithi 1 wrote: »

Check for yourself. Evidence appears to be pretty damning.

Course no-one wants to consider it because Joe is a bad man.

If they have such "damning evidence", (and it's not) then Joe would be obliged to, at the very least, bring a legal challenge forward on the subject of the presidents eligibility
Watch this space as this doesn't happen (or at the very best gets drummed straight out of court for being horsesh[SIZE="2"]i[/SIZE]t)

Why, because the only reason Mr Arpaio is pandering to this awful nonsense is to, as pointed out by the Arizona democratic party "draw attention away from problems within his own agency, such as hundreds of sex-crime cases that the sheriff's office failed to adequately investigate over a three-year period."

He's a sh[SIZE="2"]i[/SIZE]t, this is a crass stunt, let's not dignify this nonsense.

So you didnt listen to the evidence ?

I hardly think you are qualified to comment.

hooradiation

Daithi 1 wrote: »

So you didnt listen to the evidence ?

there's a whole hour plus in there, I do not have the inclination to listen to it all. So i used the magic of the internet to produce the shortened version.
And it's going nowhere because it's nonsense.

This will go away until Mr Arpaio needs to deflect attention away from his latest fuckup. If there was any truth in it, and he isn't just an opportunistic liar then why hasn't he done anything about this amazing evidence?
Apparently it's now congresses job to "do something" with it. It's almost like he has no faith in this standing up to any kind of scrutiny.


But having to search out the salient points of that mess did highlight something interesting, this 'announcement' comes just before civil-rights case against his agency gets underway.
How very bloody convenient.

Daithi 1 wrote: »

I hardly think you are qualified to comment.

On what grounds? I don't agree with your assessment? Galling for you, perhaps, but hardly grounds for the above.

Brown Bomber

hooradiation wrote: »

On what grounds? I don't agree with your assessment? Galling for you, perhaps, but hardly grounds for the above.

I believe this is why "I do not have the inclination to listen to it all"

hooradiation

Brown Bomber wrote: »

I believe this is why "I do not have the inclination to listen to it all"

Which was immediately followed by "So i used the magic of the internet to produce the shortened version."
Quotes in full are such inconvenient things, aren't they.


Of course, leaving aside the selective quoting, your assessment of the situation is backwards.
If you go to the bother of reading the posts in order what you half-quoted comes after the initial ploy to dismiss an opposing opinion on the mythical grounds of not being "qualified", making your belief an impossibility.

Sorry about that.