If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)

Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Question about books, may be a stupid one..

0000879k · 2012-07-12 22:10:15

Hi all, I bought ''Why does E = MC2 and why should we care?'' By Brian Cox and ''A brief history of time'' by Stephen Hawking and was wondering which I should read first or does it matter? I was thinking the Brian Cox one as I heard that Stephen Hawking uses e=mc2 in his book? :confused:

12-07-2012 10:10pm

#1

0000879k

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 293 ✭✭

Join Date: January 2012

Posts: 242

Hi all, I bought ''Why does E = MC2 and why should we care?'' By Brian Cox and ''A brief history of time'' by Stephen Hawking and was wondering which I should read first or does it matter? I was thinking the Brian Cox one as I heard that Stephen Hawking uses e=mc2 in his book?

0

Comments

#2 13-07-2012 2:23pm

mikhail

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭

Join Date: November 2005

Posts: 3732

Cox's book is aimed at a much more general readership. Try it first. Hawking's book is difficult, but worthwhile if you can manage it.

0
#3 13-07-2012 3:47pm

doctoremma

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,870 ✭✭✭

Join Date: October 2009

Posts: 1849

0000879k wrote: »

Hi all, I bought ''Why does E = MC2 and why should we care?'' By Brian Cox and ''A brief history of time'' by Stephen Hawking and was wondering which I should read first or does it matter? I was thinking the Brian Cox one as I heard that Stephen Hawking uses e=mc2 in his book?

I enjoyed the former recently, plugged through the latter years ago. Might revisit, now that I've read a lot more stuff in between!

0