Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

favourite investment ( guru )

  • 11-06-2012 4:39pm
    #1
    Site Banned Posts: 105 ✭✭


    mine is jim rogers , he,s the anthesitis of the usual industry hack you see wheeled out on business tv every day of the week , this is the same guy who said he was shorting the financial sector in 2007 and who has been scathing of the policy of both ben bernanke and his predescessor alan greenspan and how it created the countrys unsustainable level of debt

    his investment record aint to shabby either


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 52 ✭✭The Dublin Whale


    mine is jim rogers , he,s the anthesitis of the usual industry hack you see wheeled out on business tv every day of the week

    They are about to wheel out Jim Rogers on CNBC now if you're watching :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 185 ✭✭superluck


    I'd guess Rogers has a lot of people advising him where to invest his money.
    I find his advice strange at times.

    On the one hand he'll say the dollar is worthless but then he'll also buy dollars or hold euros while being critical of the eurozone fiscal policies.

    People I once thought had credibility but don't watch anymore: Max Keiser, Peter Schiff, Marc Faber, jim rogers -- okay, I'll still watch the odd Faber video but he creeps me out and i've heard he's a pedo but that might just be a malicious rumour.

    People I think are pretty good: Nouriel Roubini, Michael Hudson, Jim Chanos, StockTradingMaster (Youtube)

    probably more but can't think of any right now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 927 ✭✭✭turbobaby


    superluck wrote: »
    People I once thought had credibility but don't watch anymore:.... Peter Schiff

    Just wondering why you think Peter Schiff has lost credibility.

    In my view he is one of only a handful of economists wheeled out on mainstream media, who has kept his credibility completely intact.

    He absolutely nailed it in 2007.

    His prediction of US hyper inflation has yet to come, but he did warn in Crash Proof that the politicians would interfere to try keep the bubble inflated, before the hyper inflation would eventually come.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 586 ✭✭✭Mickey Dazzler


    I find Hugh Hendry of the Eclectica hedge fund is pretty interesting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 650 ✭✭✭euroboom13


    Russel napier "Anathomy of a bear"
    goldman sachs "the long good buy"

    Have clear brave view of "where next".
    Wilbur Ross

    I`m pro-euro /anti-breakup fairy tales!


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 105 ✭✭telly_lover


    superluck wrote: »
    I'd guess Rogers has a lot of people advising him where to invest his money.
    I find his advice strange at times.

    On the one hand he'll say the dollar is worthless but then he'll also buy dollars or hold euros while being critical of the eurozone fiscal policies.

    People I once thought had credibility but don't watch anymore: Max Keiser, Peter Schiff, Marc Faber, jim rogers -- okay, I'll still watch the odd Faber video but he creeps me out and i've heard he's a pedo but that might just be a malicious rumour.

    People I think are pretty good: Nouriel Roubini, Michael Hudson, Jim Chanos, StockTradingMaster (Youtube)

    probably more but can't think of any right now.


    max keiser is not an investment guru , he hates that world , he might be right on many things however, 15000 an ounce for gold :rolleyes: , marc faber is an ecentric guy but he,s not afraid to go against the grain and has an excellent track record when it comes to making predictions , when everyone appeared bullish in early spring , faber was ultra bearish

    peter schiff is a crank and a conspirocy theorist


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 927 ✭✭✭turbobaby



    peter schiff is a crank and a conspirocy theorist

    You haven't a clue! If you actually listen to his show you would realise he does not entertain any consiparcy theories from callers. He doesn't even believe the price of gold is manipulated.


  • Site Banned Posts: 105 ✭✭telly_lover


    turbobaby wrote: »
    You haven't a clue! If you actually listen to his show you would realise he does not entertain any consiparcy theories from callers. He doesn't even believe the price of gold is manipulated.

    Schiff thinks gold is going to $15000 an ounce, guys a nut


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 927 ✭✭✭turbobaby


    So according to you, both Keiser and Schiff think gold is going to $15,000 an ounce.

    Either that's a big coincidence or you're lazy and picking numbers out of thin air.

    Schiff says he does not know how high it will go, just that it is going higher. He tries to avoid making price predictions. Get your case in order before making slanderous remarks!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 185 ✭✭superluck


    turbobaby wrote: »
    Just wondering why you think Peter Schiff has lost credibility.

    He's lost credibility for me, I'm not saying people don't follow him anymore.
    I watched many videos that discuss cheap hydrocarbon energy and it's relationship with our industrial progress over the last 100 years.

    Peter Schiff attributes the success of America with free markets but the reality is they had cheap energy for almost 100 years, the biggest oil reserves in the world after Saudi Arabia up until 1970s when they had to go off the gold standard and become a net importer of oil.

    The Saudis have been carrying the water for America now since the 70s but that inevitably will come to an end as the Saudi oil fields also dry up and the regime there collapses...mark my words, it will happen ;)
    In my view he is one of only a handful of economists wheeled out on mainstream media, who has kept his credibility completely intact.

    He absolutely nailed it in 2007.

    He nailed it all by himself? Seriously, I know Schiff fans like to believe he's the oracle of economics and the only single person warning about the housing bubble but plenty of people were warning of a crisis.

    The IMF had warned the Irish government in 2006 there was a housing bubble in Ireland but did the Irish government listen? No..they completely ignored the IMF advice and look where we are now.
    His prediction of US hyper inflation has yet to come, but he did warn in Crash Proof that the politicians would interfere to try keep the bubble inflated, before the hyper inflation would eventually come.

    Anyone can make predictions.. of course hyper-inflation could happen but there will almost certainly be a world war before that happens because the US would not allow any country to undermine their dominance in the world without a fight.

    So while Shanghai corporation might setup bilateral trade deals with various nations to remove their dependence on the dollar, I can't imagine why the US would just sit and do nothing about it.

    Their wealth, power and status in the world is largely the result of plundering other nations over the years and cheap oil, not free market economic policies Mr Schiff would have you believe.
    max keiser is not an investment guru , he hates that world , he might be right on many things however, 15000 an ounce for gold rolleyes.gif , marc faber is an ecentric guy but he,s not afraid to go against the grain and has an excellent track record when it comes to making predictions , when everyone appeared bullish in early spring , faber was ultra bearish

    peter schiff is a crank and a conspirocy theorist

    Keiser's just a puppet, an entertainer like Gerald Celente.

    He does highlight a lot of problems but is short of practical solutions.

    While he does interview some good people from time to time, that's about the only reason I'd watch his show, Keiser Report.

    Gold might go to $15,000 but then so might a loaf of bread.


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 105 ✭✭telly_lover


    superluck wrote: »
    He's lost credibility for me, I'm not saying people don't follow him anymore.
    I watched many videos that discuss cheap hydrocarbon energy and it's relationship with our industrial progress over the last 100 years.

    Peter Schiff attributes the success of America with free markets but the reality is they had cheap energy for almost 100 years, the biggest oil reserves in the world after Saudi Arabia up until 1970s when they had to go off the gold standard and become a net importer of oil.

    The Saudis have been carrying the water for America now since the 70s but that inevitably will come to an end as the Saudi oil fields also dry up and the regime there collapses...mark my words, it will happen ;)



    He nailed it all by himself? Seriously, I know Schiff fans like to believe he's the oracle of economics and the only single person warning about the housing bubble but plenty of people were warning of a crisis.

    The IMF had warned the Irish government in 2006 there was a housing bubble in Ireland but did the Irish government listen? No..they completely ignored the IMF advice and look where we are now.



    Anyone can make predictions.. of course hyper-inflation could happen but there will almost certainly be a world war before that happens because the US would not allow any country to undermine their dominance in the world without a fight.

    So while Shanghai corporation might setup bilateral trade deals with various nations to remove their dependence on the dollar, I can't imagine why the US would just sit and do nothing about it.

    Their wealth, power and status in the world is largely the result of plundering other nations over the years and cheap oil, not free market economic policies Mr Schiff would have you believe.



    Keiser's just a puppet, an entertainer like Gerald Celente.

    He does highlight a lot of problems but is short of practical solutions.

    While he does interview some good people from time to time, that's about the only reason I'd watch his show, Keiser Report.

    Gold might go to $15,000 but then so might a loaf of bread.


    i attributed the $15000 ounce of gold prediction to max keizer by mistake in my earlier post , it was of course made by peter schiff

    marc faber is highly eccentric but of right more often than wrong from what i see

    how do you rate rogers ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 185 ✭✭superluck


    All I can say is if I had money to invest, I'd probably not take his advice although I do still watch his interviews.

    I'm guessing you're already familiar with The SchittReport? :D



    I could recommend you watch 'The End Of Suburbia' or 'The Crude Awakening' as they both show the relationship between economic growth and cheap hydrocarbon fuel, it's fascinating but also very worrying.

    I've given up worrying about it, we're probably screwed. LOL :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 499 ✭✭Roonbox


    mine is jim rogers , he,s the anthesitis of the usual industry hack you see wheeled out on business tv every day of the week , this is the same guy who said he was shorting the financial sector in 2007 and who has been scathing of the policy of both ben bernanke and his predescessor alan greenspan and how it created the countrys unsustainable level of debt

    his investment record aint to shabby either

    Jim Rogers is my hero.. been following every word he has said since 2007.. the man is incredible.. He constantly dumbs it down for the public and wont be drawn into short term predictions..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 499 ✭✭Roonbox


    In fact most names been thrown around here, Schiff. Faber & Rogers, basically those with an Austrian economic;s view, are pretty good. The problem with trying to please everyone is that in the short term anything can happen, Schiff tends to get drawn into offering a short term prediction sometimes, but the guy understands whats going on in the world..

    Roubini is a complete farce

    Max Keiser is just a bit too much in the tinfoil hat direction for me


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 927 ✭✭✭turbobaby


    superluck wrote: »
    I watched many videos that discuss cheap hydrocarbon energy and it's relationship with our industrial progress over the last 100 years.

    Peter Schiff attributes the success of America with free markets but the reality is they had cheap energy for almost 100 years, the biggest oil reserves in the world after Saudi Arabia up until 1970s when they had to go off the gold standard and become a net importer of oil.

    The Saudis have been carrying the water for America now since the 70s but that inevitably will come to an end as the Saudi oil fields also dry up and the regime there collapses...mark my words, it will happen ;)

    You've inadvertently contradicted yourself there by bringing up the Saudis. I completely agree that the US has benefited from cheap energy, but you have to ask yourself why the people of the Middle East are still so poor despite also having cheap oil. They have been let down by their governments.
    superluck wrote: »
    He nailed it all by himself? Seriously, I know Schiff fans like to believe he's the oracle of economics and the only single person warning about the housing bubble but plenty of people were warning of a crisis.

    Go back and actually read my post that you quoted. I said there was only a handful of people from mainstream media that were calling the housing bubble.
    superluck wrote: »
    The IMF had warned the Irish government in 2006 there was a housing bubble in Ireland but did the Irish government listen? No..they completely ignored the IMF advice and look where we are now.

    I agree, the Irish government is useless! More reason to reduce it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 299 ✭✭Low Energy Eng


    superluck wrote: »
    Peter Schiff attributes the success of America with free markets but the reality is they had cheap energy for almost 100 years, the biggest oil reserves in the world after Saudi Arabia up until 1970s when they had to go off the gold standard and become a net importer of oil.

    The Saudis have been carrying the water for America now since the 70s but that inevitably will come to an end as the Saudi oil fields also dry up and the regime there collapses...mark my words, it will happen ;)

    When you say cheap energy, you mean cheap oil in dollar terms, if oil is priced in gold its cheaper than ever. You're buying into the belief that the world is running out of oil very soon, of course it is finite, but you're believing the spin from politicians (I'm sure Obama is blaming current oil prices on the middle east etc) that we've reached peak oil, or the bell curve, that's causing the price of oil to rocket. Personally, I don't buy into this, but that's economics.

    Schiff highlights the more likely scenario that its the dollar that's in trouble, the QE'ing & low interest rates that are driving the price of oil, which, to me makes alot more sense.
    superluck wrote: »
    Gold might go to $15,000 but then so might a loaf of bread.

    Well ye, this is the point, if bread does go to $15,000 you shouldnt be holding dollars or euros but gold & silver. Schiff is warning that if we continue down the nanny state path we can expect these prices alot sooner than the ordinary joe-so politician is expecting.

    I guess reverting to the OP's question, I guess Peter would be my favorite, (which is probably obvious from the above) however I also like Jim Rogers, my favorite site for investment news would be zerohedge


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 185 ✭✭superluck


    Roonbox wrote:
    In fact most names been thrown around here, Schiff. Faber & Rogers, basically those with an Austrian economic;s view, are pretty good. The problem with trying to please everyone is that in the short term anything can happen, Schiff tends to get drawn into offering a short term prediction sometimes, but the guy understands whats going on in the world..

    Roubini is a complete farce

    Max Keiser is just a bit too much in the tinfoil hat direction for me

    How is Roubini a "complete farce" ?
    turbobaby wrote: »
    You've inadvertently contradicted yourself there by bringing up the Saudis. I completely agree that the US has benefited from cheap energy, but you have to ask yourself why the people of the Middle East are still so poor despite also having cheap oil. They have been let down by their governments.

    No, I brought up the Saudis because they have been selling their oil in dollars, that's what i meant by them "carrying the water"

    Why would a country in the middle east with the worlds largest oil reserves sell oil in dollars? Why not the Saudi Riyal? ...you'll see in the history of oil on youtube.



    Saudi Arabia is ruled by a royal family for 40+ years with the blessing of the US who buy cheap oil from them using dollars they can print infinitely but everyone else has to buy dollars to get oil.
    Go back and actually read my post that you quoted. I said there was only a handful of people from mainstream media that were calling the housing bubble.

    You said:
    In my view he is one of only a handful of economists wheeled out on mainstream media, who has kept his credibility completely intact.

    He absolutely nailed it in 2007.

    okay, my mistake.
    I agree, the Irish government is useless! More reason to reduce it.

    And then what? Who will take over?
    Look at Somalia, is that the kind of system you'd prefer?

    There's nothing wrong with fiat money provided the people control it and not private bankers.
    When you say cheap energy, you mean cheap oil in dollar terms, if oil is priced in gold its cheaper than ever. You're buying into the belief that the world is running out of oil very soon, of course it is finite, but you're believing the spin from politicians (I'm sure Obama is blaming current oil prices on the middle east etc) that we've reached peak oil, or the bell curve, that's causing the price of oil to rocket. Personally, I don't buy into this, but that's economics.

    Schiff highlights the more likely scenario that its the dollar that's in trouble, the QE'ing & low interest rates that are driving the price of oil, which, to me makes alot more sense.

    How is the dollar valuable? What's so special about a piece of paper with a dead president on it?

    Oil is sold in dollars, the dollar is the reserve currency, it's the petro-dollar ....that's the hidden value, it's backed by oil.

    Imagine if Ireland had no oil tomorrow, what kind of a country would we be living in?

    Think about it, our entire way of life completely depends on cheap energy like oil and gas.

    There are 2 types of oil, conventional and non-conventional.
    The conventional oil is the low hanging fruit, the stuff that's easy to extract from the earth and refine, you'll find most of this right now in the middle east and north africa.

    Then there's unconventional oil (tar sands, fracking) which economically costs more than conventional to extract and refine.

    To give you an example, a barrel of oil produced in Iraq or Libya might only cost $1 whereas a barrel of tar sands might cost $100

    I'm not saying there's a shortage of oil, I'm saying the production costs are getting more expensive and those costs inevitably get pushed on to the tax payer in increased food costs.

    So if you look at any energy crisis in the industrialised world, you'll see a correlation with recessions.

    You can see examples of this during the 1970s


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 499 ✭✭Roonbox


    superluck wrote: »
    How is Roubini a "complete farce" ?

    [/URL]

    Farce may be a bit harsh, the guy came out 3 months ago and said that Europe and U.S should have more qe.......MORE QE, thats not a typo.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 185 ✭✭superluck


    Roonbox, I once believed that Austerity was the solution but then I came to realise it was an ideology.

    Austerity is nothing more than an ideology, it's completely unnecessary but the government will do the utmost to convince you otherwise...why?

    The whole purpose of a central bank irrespective of what some people will tell you is to create money out of thin air...

    We're currently under the illusion/spell our bail-out money is owned by someone, somewhere in the world...this is simply not the case.

    Where does money actually come from? ..it's made up, it's just paper or numbers in a computer so you don't have to kill someone to get your next meal.

    Peter Schiff has an ideologue the same as Ron Paul who just endorsed Mitt Romney.

    The only difference between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama is they represent different parties.

    Unfortunately, the central bank in US are giving 0% loans to private banks who then invest that money overseas or buy up US treasury bonds/bills with 2.5% return and that is where the real problem is.

    We need to take the power back -- remove private bankers from government because they're sucking the blood out of our economy to enrich themselves and their masters.

    That will only happen with the will of the people.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 185 ✭✭superluck


    Even if you had 10 ounces of gold and tomorrow we ended up on a gold standard, can you imagine how poor you'd be?

    The solution to our problems is remove private bankers and their influence from government, that's all we have to do...easier said than done of course.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 927 ✭✭✭turbobaby


    It was Ron Paul's son that endorsed Mitt Romney, but I agree that Obama and Romney are almost the same.

    You mentioned that you need to take the bankers out of government. Paul, Schiff and other Libertarians say this is best accomplished by limiting the power of the politicians so that they have less favours to dole out to their mates.

    If the gold standard returned I would rather have 10 ounces of gold than none!!


Advertisement