Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Would you have any problem with your data being shared across government departments

  • 30-05-2012 2:10pm
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭


    Data protection is an issue but if you'd nothing to hide would you mind if civil servants could view your PAYE, welfare claims, car reg, criminal records etc. on one centralised database, all found under your PPS number.
    The downsides lie in the nature of people to be easily corrupted & use/sell the data for nefarious means.
    There is also a big brother element which is unsettling.
    The major upsides would be the reduction in welfare fraud, instant means testing, up to date electoral register, immediate census figures, reduction in black economy & probably a load I haven't thought of.

    Yes, nosey civil servants will invade privacy, ala Dolores McNamara, but I believe the good outweighs the bad & the benefits are huge.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,410 ✭✭✭old_aussie


    No, they can all have a good laugh at my data


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭Nothingbetter2d


    Rabidlamb wrote: »
    Data protection is an issue but if you'd nothing to hide would you mind if civil servants could view your PAYE, welfare claims, car reg, criminal records etc. on one centralised database, all found under your PPS number.
    The downsides lie in the nature of people to be easily corrupted & use/sell the data for nefarious means.
    There is also a big brother element which is unsettling.
    The major upsides would be the reduction in welfare fraud, instant means testing, up to date electoral register, immediate census figures, reduction in black economy & probably a load I haven't thought of.

    Yes, nosey civil servants will invade privacy, ala Dolores McNamara, but I believe the good outweighs the bad & the benefits are huge.

    the bigesst problem i see with it is all it takes is one dodgy employee and all your personal info is sold to dubious people. so no its a bad idea


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭Seachmall


    I see the government as one entity. If one department has data on me I assume the others have access to it anyway, so I don't particularly care if they share it or not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,235 ✭✭✭✭Cee-Jay-Cee


    I wouldnt mind in the slightest/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,096 ✭✭✭✭the groutch


    Rabidlamb wrote: »
    The major upsides would be the reduction in welfare fraud.

    http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/279/799/76b.gif


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,302 ✭✭✭Bits_n_Bobs


    Soon as they tell me exactly what they are up to in Nama, set up a proper Freedom of Information system and generally start sharing all the ****e that they are getting up to, they can share my data amongst each other.

    Until then - no :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,899 ✭✭✭megaten


    Yes, I don't see why personal information should be shared anymore than necessary. If it is needed I'd like that all requests for personal details between departments be recorded in case of misuse.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,513 ✭✭✭donalg1


    No I wouldnt mind at all, in fact they should be doing it as it would save a lot of time and hassle going between Govt Departments for information that could all be held on one database and linked to my PPS Number.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,809 ✭✭✭✭smash


    Rabidlamb wrote: »
    The major upsides would be the reduction in welfare fraud, instant means testing

    How?

    Skanger 1 has baby and claims free house and single others allowance and is not working. Skanger 2 is the father and his name is not on birth cert etc. His address for tax purpose, car insurance etc is still at his parents family home. Now there is no way the centralised system could cop that. You'd still need an investigator.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,263 ✭✭✭✭Borderfox


    At present for me I couldnt trust the government to do this correctly and the cost to centralise everything would as usual be huge.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭Rabidlamb


    smash wrote: »
    How?

    Skanger 1 has baby and claims free house and single others allowance and is not working. Skanger 2 is the father and his name is not on birth cert etc. His address for tax purpose, car insurance etc is still at his parents family home. Now there is no way the centralised system could cop that. You'd still need an investigator.

    Yes, but if Skanger 2 claims a full weeks social while revenue records earnings then alarm bells will go off.
    If he tries to claim rent allowance while living with his parents that will be flagged too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,791 ✭✭✭Linoge


    smash wrote: »
    How?

    Skanger 1 has baby and claims free house and single others allowance and is not working. Skanger 2 is the father and his name is not on birth cert etc. His address for tax purpose, car insurance etc is still at his parents family home. Now there is no way the centralised system could cop that. You'd still need an investigator.

    But it would make it harder. If he was living at home he couldn't claim rent allowance on top etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    That's how it should be done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,512 ✭✭✭Ellis Dee


    On a few conditions: 1) that the country has a Data Protection Ombudsman with adequate staff and real powers. 2) That all public servants are liable for their official actions (and possible gross negligence) under criminal law. 3) That trustworthiness and honesty break out on a wide scale in Ireland.:)

    The first two could be done, perhaps with some assistance from countries, like the Nordic ones, that already have such systems in place.;)

    Number 3 might be a bit more difficult to achieve.:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,229 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    They're obviously a lot more stupid than I gave them credit for, being as they didn't decide to share information the moment they got their hands on computers.

    A stuffed gerbil would have realised that it was the thing to do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,862 ✭✭✭✭inforfun


    Some things i find rather unbelievable that they are not linked.
    For example car ownership database and motortax database.

    Register a car in your name? Ok, here is your motor tax bill.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    I would have more concern about this in the UK or US than I would have in Ireland at present. People get arrested in these countries over stupid misreinterpred comments made on Twitter and other social media sites.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,809 ✭✭✭✭smash


    Rabidlamb wrote: »
    Yes, but if Skanger 2 claims a full weeks social while revenue records earnings then alarm bells will go off.
    If he tries to claim rent allowance while living with his parents that will be flagged too.

    But these are things that should happen automatically anyway without the need for totally shared systems.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 256 ✭✭Statistician


    Rabidlamb wrote: »
    Data protection is an issue but if you'd nothing to hide

    I hate this crap nohing to hide, nothing to worry about it really does make me feel like vomiting over my keyboard. Who came up with this gem?

    Tomorrow I won't bother wearing any clothes. I have nothing to hide after all. I'll also leave my front door open so the neighbours can have a snoop around my house.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭Seachmall


    I hate this crap nohing to hide, nothing to worry about it really does make me feel like vomiting over my keyboard. Who came up with this gem?

    Tomorrow I won't bother wearing any clothes. I have nothing to hide after all. I'll also leave my front door open so the neighbours can have a snoop around my house.

    People who have nothing to hide get very offended when I put cameras in their toilets.

    Makes no sense :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,344 ✭✭✭Thoie


    I wouldn't see the need for everything to be shared randomly, but no problem with sensible sharing.

    For example, if Revenue and Social Welfare shared info, it would make things easier on both sides, and for the customer. I can't see why car ownership details would be useful to those departments.

    Likewise, sharing medical information across medical departments/hospitals would make sense, but the hospital doesn't need to know my car details either.

    Driving license and car registration might work together (though can't see any current need for it).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,182 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    Seachmall wrote: »
    I see the government as one entity. If one department has data on me I assume the others have access to it anyway, so I don't particularly care if they share it or not.


    That is not the case due to data protection. Every department is its own business for want of a better word.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,533 ✭✭✭Jester252


    I not might as long it reduces the number of forms that I have to fill


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,810 ✭✭✭Mackman


    Thoie wrote: »
    I wouldn't see the need for everything to be shared randomly, but no problem with sensible sharing.

    For example, if Revenue and Social Welfare shared info, it would make things easier on both sides, and for the customer. I can't see why car ownership details would be useful to those departments.

    Likewise, sharing medical information across medical departments/hospitals would make sense, but the hospital doesn't need to know my car details either.

    Driving license and car registration might work together (though can't see any current need for it).

    It would make certain things a lot quicker if this was the case.

    I cant understand why they dont do it, oh wait, thats right, because it makes sense


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,640 ✭✭✭Pushtrak


    I'd rather they had my anecdotes. Can't get data from that.


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,037 ✭✭✭paddyandy


    Everything on my pcs and tech. is well secured but my accs. in aib and irish perm i would worry about if it got out .I wonder how good the security is and i've no certainty .How well are people vetted?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    the bigesst problem i see with it is all it takes is one dodgy employee and all your personal info is sold to dubious people. so no its a bad idea

    When the Irish woman that won the European lotto - how many civil servants went looking into her life and details through their networks?
    A lot if I remember right. There was some serious trouble over it soon thereafter.

    Making that task easier is not a good thing.
    (Any rag newspaper reporter will be rubbing their hands in glee with things been made easier to dig up - and an unscrupulousness other person will be looking to make a few bob by passing leaked tips/info to papers.)

    Such info should only be accessible so widely if necessary, by court judged order and THEN by the Gardi or other investigation body.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,919 ✭✭✭✭Gummy Panda


    Yes I would. I wouldn't want someone having access to data that isn't relevant to their department.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,418 ✭✭✭✭hondasam


    Rabidlamb wrote: »
    The downsides lie in the nature of people to be easily corrupted & use/sell the data for nefarious means.

    Civil servants have access to all this information now and I have not heard of anyone selling information on people.

    I would not be in favour of one centralised database.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,827 ✭✭✭christmas2012


    I would not be comfortable with our government handling such data,remember the break ins to electric companies holding data on their customers?

    I wouldnt have confidence in them whatsover..

    The whole idea its on one PPS number would freak me out as what if somebody stole it on me,or stole it off the civil etc..I would be worried

    Although i do see it is a good idea to have all your information accessible to cut out fraud etc..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭skinny90


    Data protection and internet/online don't go well together...I know a fair few hackers(both Irish and Spanish) who have worked for the banks and Interpol and basically any info that's made online in some form can be accessed


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,541 ✭✭✭Smidge


    Do not agree with sharing data across departments. Quite frankly I don't have enough faith in the ability of public servants to handle information in a secure manner, this is from personal experience btw


Advertisement