Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

IWC Spitfire

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    It might be worth mentioning that the lady flies a Junkers Ju 52 (or "Iron Annie").

    You can get the watch of that name without the John Malkovich price tag :D

    205412.jpg


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,285 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Peasant to the rescue! :D

    Plus if you want a watch that could have been worn by an actual Spitfire pilot you could get one of these for under 900 euro
    longinemilitary.jpg
    The Omega versions are about a quarter more expensive. For no good reason IMH. Though it seems most wore a personal watch, so any late 30's watch would do.

    The German pilots were more likely to have an "issued" watch or a more consistent watch choice for the fighter pilots*. Usually Hanhart or Glashutte chronographs with earlier guys going for Omega and Zenith oversized black dial types with rotating bezels.
    omega_v1_mana_1.jpg




    *Aside* I've been blessed in my life to sit in a Spitfire, a Junkers 52(though the civilian version IIRC) and an ME109(Spanish version with a Merlin engine no less). The JU 52 was a lovely aircraft in the inside. Felt safe. The Spitfire was gorgeous to look at, but much smaller than you'd think and looking out of the cockpit you didn't see much beyond wing and engine. The ME109 was very claustrophobic. Bear in mind I was a skinny 14 year old at the time. Never mind fighting in one they were brave buggers to even fly in one.:eek:



    *EDIT for very good operational reasons. The German pilots were used to operating well forward of the lines. All part of the Blitzkrieg innovation. So they needed watches, not for navigation as such, but mostly for watching fuel. Those early war piston engined planes were not economical on petrol. They were organised leaks with wings. IIRC Spits had a range of 90 miles, the Me109 had on average 15 minutes of fighting time over southern England, so they had to be very aware of fuel and time available. Doubly so when the decision was made higher up to make them stay with the bombers. That really drank the fuel. The British on the other hand were operating from their own backyard, so had much more leeway. Plus they were vectored onto targets by their ground control so navigation wasn't as much of an issue.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,731 ✭✭✭Bullseye1


    That Junkers is very nice. What sort of price tag?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 80 ✭✭Flashwatches


    I really like IWC watches and specially their pilots, but the hyprocricy of calling it the Spitfire really annoys me:mad:. IWC was one of five companies manufacturing pilot watches for the German Luftwaffe during the war.

    The closest the pilots who wore IWC watches in the war got to a spitfire was at the end of a hail of bullets:eek:, and I think it is in very bad taste for IWC to change or alter their heritage and make people believe they made watches for Spitfire pilots.

    Sorry for the rant, I do like IWC but that really gets my goat up every time. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,731 ✭✭✭Bullseye1


    That's interesting. Why didn't they just call them Messerschmitt?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,285 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I really like IWC watches and specially their pilots, but the hyprocricy of calling it the Spitfire really annoys me:mad:. IWC was one of five companies manufacturing pilot watches for the German Luftwaffe during the war.
    True, more for bomber navigators rather than pilots though. Pilots tended to wear chronos. They never mention the German Luftwaffe connection, or very rarely and couched in vague terms.
    The closest the pilots who wore IWC watches in the war got to a spitfire was at the end of a hail of bullets:eek:, and I think it is in very bad taste for IWC to change or alter their heritage and make people believe they made watches for Spitfire pilots.
    Indeed. They could argue that their first pilots watch the so called Mark IX was used by pilots on both sides, but they seem to have been again more aimed at German/European tastes(The British taste was generally more conservative. You can find so called "trench watches" well into the thirties, a design from the first world war). They're basically a smaller version of the so called Luftwaffe pattern made by Omega, Helvetia and Zenith among others.
    c8dfb350bca1d83804a7d9612cf36d20ebfd52da
    They're also crazily rare, so never produced in much numbers. Then again well into the 30's IWC weren't known as a wristwatch company, more like a small scale(if quality) pocket watch company. They came late to the wrist watch game, never mind the pilots watch game, though you'd never believe it if you read their PR stuff.
    Bullseye1 wrote:
    That's interesting. Why didn't they just call them Messerschmitt?
    Political correctness, mixed with distancing themselves from that "unfortunate" regime. They have to think about many markets who would shy away from such a connection. Product recognition too. A huge chunk of people will know what a Spitfire is, but a lot fewer would know what a Messerschmitt is. It's a more positively emotive word.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 80 ✭✭Flashwatches


    Bullseye1 wrote: »
    That's interesting. Why didn't they just call them Messerschmitt?

    They are distancing themselves like Wibbs said, but not do much for the customer but for the large population of Jewish people who are involved and control alot of the jewelry trade.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    If you want a "Messerschmitt" you'll have to go to Aristo :D

    aristo-uhren-messerschmitt.jpg

    They now market a whole range of Messerschmitts without the Aristo bit ...check the bay


    As for the price of that Junkers ...they have so many versions ...quartz, manual chrono, auto chrono ...from 200 to > 1000


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,263 ✭✭✭✭Eoin


    Bullseye1 wrote: »
    That Junkers is very nice. What sort of price tag?

    $275 according to the first result on google. Didn't look at any other sites.

    Edit, as peasant says, there is a range of prices.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 artomur


    Bullseye1 wrote: »
    That Junkers is very nice. What sort of price tag?
    http://www.junkers-shop.de/Junkers-Watch-6218-2-Automatic-Watch-ETA-Valjoux-Chronograph-with-Day-Date this is the junkers for me .anyone got any experience on one of thJunkers-Uhr-6218-2-Automatikuhr-ETA-Valjoux-Chronograph-mit-Datum-Tag_b2.jpg



    ese ??


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    artomur wrote: »
    this is the junkers for me .anyone got any experience on one of these ??

    I have one Junkers made mechanical chrono (with a Russian movement, not the auto Valjoux that you're looking at) that originally retailed in the mid 300's.

    Build quality is superb, above its pricetag, no complaints whatsoever.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,731 ✭✭✭Bullseye1


    Interesting that they are selling some with the 3133 movement. Very nice looking mechanical watches for less than €400.
    http://www.junkers-shop.de/Junkers-Watch-6206M-2-Mechanical-Watch-Poljot-3133-Chronograph-with-Date


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,731 ✭✭✭Bullseye1




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,285 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I like this one. Basically a lookalike of the Hanhart chronos of WW2 that ME109 jockeys wore. For 299? :eek: no wonder it's outa stock. The modern hanhart homages are in the thousands mark and for an original add at least a zero to the Junkers price for a ropey one with springs hanging out of the dial.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    If you find a 3133 (Poljot) powered one that you like and that's in stock ...you'd better buy it now.
    As mentioned elsewhere, the 3133 chrono movement is no longer. The company Maktime that made them stopped production and is apparently bust. Also it seems that the tooling has reached the end of its life and no buyer has come forward to resurrect it.

    So get 'em while they're hot :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,731 ✭✭✭Bullseye1


    This one is also very nice but out of stock.
    http://www.junkers-shop.de/Junkers-Watch-6702-5-Mechanical-Watch-Poljot-3133-Chronograph-with-Date

    What are the chances taking P's post above of these being back in stock?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    There still is a stockpile of 3133 movements floating about ...but as to who will buy them and what watches they will end up in ...who knows?


Advertisement