Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

London Irish v Gloucester Brawl

  • 07-05-2012 1:26pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭




    It's going to be interesting to see what comes out of this. You can see Hamilton give Paice a shove off the ball, and Paice reacts by clearing him out, and they start trading blows.

    It will be interesting to see what sort of suspensions players pick up.

    I also came across this statement by Brian Smith. Its a bit much to be blaming Hamilton for the cut on Paice's head sustained after the yellow cards, when it looks like Paice is the one who re-starts the fight and throws the first punch.

    http://www.espnscrum.com/premiership-2011-12/rugby/story/163736.html


Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,269 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    Check out the London Irish full back at 1.21 :cool:. Not in the slightest bit interested in getting involved :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    Pacie didn't throw a punch. he shoved him in the chest and then Hamilton re-act completely over the top with 2 huge punches. You can tell from Paice's body language he wasn't going to throw a punch, Hamiltion decided to though. In saying that it was stupid of Paice to go over a second time after the yellow but Hamilitons reaction to being pushed was ridiculous. Obviously the 4-5 uppercuts Paice attempts after that won't help him but I can understand his reaction.

    It's not mention in the report about the LI number 8 being citied which if he isn't is crazy. He comes in at 3:04 and just T's off on Hamiliton with 3 or 4 punches, then punches the gloucster number 18 when he tries to stop it and then smacks the Gloucester number 9 and dazes him. Also LI number 11 tries a dirty cheap shot on the Gloucester number 18 aswell. Complete scummy behaviour by both of them and I think the LI 8 should be the one to get the longest ban of the lot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,273 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    The person who deserves the longest ban in the LI no.8. First he starts punching the Gloucester second row when he is being held and so unable to protect himself, then he hits two other Gloucester players. He was just trying to get cheap shots in at anyone in a red and white jersey but showed what a coward he really is when he jumps back as the fists come his way. That guy shouldnt be allowed near a rugby pitch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Paice and Hamilton walking off the field, neither no longer involved in the game. Hamilton had his back to Paice. Paice starts shouting at Hamilton and then walks over and shoves him. He's absolutely in the wrong there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,620 ✭✭✭✭errlloyd


    I think the real loser here is English rugby. Even though thats needlessly philosophical.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭Flincher


    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    The person who deserves the longest ban in the LI no.8. First he starts punching the Gloucester second row when he is being held and so unable to protect himself, then he hits two other Gloucester players. He was just trying to get cheap shots in at anyone in a red and white jersey but showed what a coward he really is when he jumps back as the fists come his way. That guy shouldnt be allowed near a rugby pitch.

    Just realised that is Ofisa Treviranus, who used to play as a winger for Connacht a while back. He has bulked up a lot since.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,770 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    Soccer tougher than rugby ! - can you imagine if that fight took place at Old Trafford , Sky would have it as headlines for a month


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,269 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    Arsenal and Man United had a right good brawl in the 90's and both teams ended up getting points deductions.

    http://www.independent.ie/sport/pictures-infamous-pitch-brawls-2998567.html?ino=3

    That would of course never happen in football now but certainly the FA let it be known with the points deduction given that it should not happen again.

    The above clip is a bad image for the game, for example does anyone know the final score?
    it was 52-18 to Irish with 8 tries being scored and 4 of em coming when both teams were full strength


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    thebaz wrote: »
    Soccer tougher than rugby !
    Strictly speaking, that wasn't actually rugby.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    Is that the second time Hamilton has been involved in something like this during the season?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    .ak wrote: »
    Is that the second time Hamilton has been involved in something like this during the season?

    He reminds me of Caldwell, he's a bit of an eejit but a really good player. IIRC he gave away some really stupid penalties in this years' Six Nations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    He reminds me of Caldwell, he's a bit of an eejit but a really good player. IIRC he gave away some really stupid penalties in this years' Six Nations.

    Agreed. He's a really good lock, and I like the bloke, but he always seems to get baited in games quite easily.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,234 ✭✭✭totallegend


    Paice started the whole thing, then kicked it off again after getting carded and deserves everything he gets, whether that's just a solid clatter from Hamilton or a suspension as well. A player I never had much time for.

    Last game of the season for both sides, not sure if there's much point suspending people.

    Bob Casey's last ever game by the way.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    Paice started the whole thing

    Actually, Hamilton started it. He pushed Paice off the ball from behind at 0:13. Paice got up and chased him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,234 ✭✭✭totallegend


    Hagz wrote: »
    Actually, Hamilton started it. He pushed Paice off the ball from behind at 0:13. Paice got up and chased him.

    Yeah, that's true, but what Hamilton did happens 50 times a game, if everybody reacts like that, there'd be anarchy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 854 ✭✭✭RoundBox11


    Hagz wrote: »
    Actually, Hamilton started it. He pushed Paice off the ball from behind at 0:13. Paice got up and chased him.


    Its rugby, ur going to get pushed off the ball, no need to start a fight over it.

    Hamilton got on with the game, its Paice's fault for chasing after him and starting the fight


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    Hagz wrote: »
    Actually, Hamilton started it. He pushed Paice off the ball from behind at 0:13. Paice got up and chased him.

    Yeah but Paice certainly threw the first dig. Locks do that kinda niggily stuff all the time.. no reason to start throwing haymakers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    .ak wrote: »
    Yeah but Paice certainly threw the first dig. Locks do that kinda niggily stuff all the time.. no reason to start throwing haymakers.
    RoundBox11 wrote: »
    Its rugby, ur going to get pushed off the ball, no need to start a fight over it.

    Hamilton got on with the game, its Paice's fault for chasing after him and starting the fight
    Yeah, that's true, but what Hamilton did happens 50 times a game, if everybody reacts like that, there'd be anarchy.

    True.


  • Subscribers Posts: 16,663 ✭✭✭✭copacetic


    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    The person who deserves the longest ban in the LI no.8. First he starts punching the Gloucester second row when he is being held and so unable to protect himself, then he hits two other Gloucester players. He was just trying to get cheap shots in at anyone in a red and white jersey but showed what a coward he really is when he jumps back as the fists come his way. That guy shouldnt be allowed near a rugby pitch.

    he could certainly get a ban, but he went after the guy who started it, and far from being a coward when the fists came his way he decked both the guys throwing them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,059 ✭✭✭Sindri


    errlloyd wrote: »
    I think the real loser here is English rugby. Even though thats needlessly philosophical.

    You mean melodramatic.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,881 ✭✭✭PhatPiggins


    What dissapointed me most about watching this game is that it was Bob Casey's last game of rugby and there is almost no mention of it over here. Here is a guy who under slightly different circumstances would have 70+ caps for Ireland and would have been a Lions starter in 2005. I know we all make our decisions and Casey seems to be and always has been happy with his career but I'll always think that Ireland missed out on a good one there.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,269 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    What dissapointed me most about watching this game is that it was Bob Casey's last game of rugby and there is almost no mention of it over here. Here is a guy who under slightly different circumstances would have 70+ caps for Ireland and would have been a Lions starter in 2005. I know we all make our decisions and Casey seems to be and always has been happy with his career but I'll always think that Ireland missed out on a good one there.

    I don't want to knock the guy but when he had chances for Ireland he never took them. He wasn't better than POC, DOC, or MOK who were the mainstays of the Ireland second row for the time he was knocking about and one of the reasons he left Leinster was because of Cullen and MOK.

    Why do you think he could have been a Lions starter in 2005?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 751 ✭✭✭lologram


    What dissapointed me most about watching this game is that it was Bob Casey's last game of rugby and there is almost no mention of it over here. Here is a guy who under slightly different circumstances would have 70+ caps for Ireland and would have been a Lions starter in 2005. I know we all make our decisions and Casey seems to be and always has been happy with his career but I'll always think that Ireland missed out on a good one there.

    Nice try, Bob Casey.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    What dissapointed me most about watching this game is that it was Bob Casey's last game of rugby and there is almost no mention of it over here. Here is a guy who under slightly different circumstances would have 70+ caps for Ireland and would have been a Lions starter in 2005. I know we all make our decisions and Casey seems to be and always has been happy with his career but I'll always think that Ireland missed out on a good one there.

    Would he have started ahead of POC or MOK for Ireland in your opinion?

    Kidney did bring him back into the setup in 2008, so he did get a chance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Bob Casey was always very limited


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,881 ✭✭✭PhatPiggins


    CatFromHue wrote: »
    I don't want to knock the guy but when he had chances for Ireland he never took them. He wasn't better than POC, DOC, or MOK who were the mainstays of the Ireland second row for the time he was knocking about and one of the reasons he left Leinster was because of Cullen and MOK.

    Why do you think he could have been a Lions starter in 2005?

    Because DOC was a Lions starter in 2005 :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,234 ✭✭✭totallegend


    Would he have started ahead of POC or MOK for Ireland in your opinion?

    Kidney did bring him back into the setup in 2008, so he did get a chance.

    He did on his boll*x, in fairness. I've seen this posted a couple of times (NB, not by you, Thomond) that Casey got chances with Ireland, he just never took his opportunities. It's nonsense, a couple of games against the Barbarians and that poxy tour to USA and Canada in 2009 were the sum total of his chances after he left for England.

    Make your own judgements on Casey and what he could have become, but he 100% deserved more caps for Ireland than the handful he managed. We capped plenty of vastly inferior second-rows in the period between Casey's first cap and his retirement.

    Wow, didn't know I was so passionate about Bob Casey.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,144 ✭✭✭Benny Cake


    Because DOC was a Lions starter in 2005 :pac:

    Ah now, he really wasn't... He was a Lions tourist, hardly a starter...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    I've seen Casey plenty enough to know he was not unfairly treated by the IRFU. He was big and physical but very limited. He was never on the level of MOK, POC or DOC. Great player for London Irish and a hell of a bloke, but he was repeatedly overrated here in Ireland by people who clearly didn't watch much of him in the Zurich Premierhsip as it was.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,592 ✭✭✭GerM


    Benny Cake wrote: »
    Ah now, he really wasn't... He was a Lions tourist, hardly a starter...

    Eh...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,881 ✭✭✭PhatPiggins


    Benny Cake wrote: »
    Ah now, he really wasn't... He was a Lions tourist, hardly a starter...

    Which tour were you watching?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,881 ✭✭✭PhatPiggins


    I've seen Casey plenty enough to know he was not unfairly treated by the IRFU. He was big and physical but very limited. He was never on the level of MOK, POC or DOC. Great player for London Irish and a hell of a bloke, but he was repeatedly overrated here in Ireland by people who clearly didn't watch much of him in the Zurich Premierhsip as it was.

    Er he's a secondrow not a centre. Big, physical and an excellent lineout operator. Partner him with an athletic lock loke and MOK or POC and I don't see what else you need from a secondrow partnership


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Er he's a secondrow not a centre. Big, physical and an excellent lineout operator. Partner him with an athletic lock loke and MOK or POC and I don't see what else you need from a secondrow partnership

    Being big and physical is only useful if you can get around the field to put it to use. Like, say, DOC. Especially with a team like ours at the time. DOC was always the better choice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,143 ✭✭✭locum-motion


    ... MOK, POC or DOC ...

    See, that's the problem: He's Casey not O'Casey. Don't you know the rule?; you can only play 2nd row for Ireland if you're an O'...
    Just ask Mick O'Driscoll or Lee O'Cullen!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,144 ✭✭✭Benny Cake


    GerM wrote: »
    Eh...
    Which tour were you watching?

    Oops, thought the post referred to 09 not 05.. My bad :o


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,881 ✭✭✭PhatPiggins


    Being big and physical is only useful if you can get around the field to put it to use. Like, say, DOC. Especially with a team like ours at the time. DOC was always the better choice.

    A fair point. I think its a pity he didn't stay in Ireland and become a 'proper' professional. He got away with murder being over weight and only having to play 60 minutes a match for LI


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 3,807 ✭✭✭castie


    See, that's the problem: He's Casey not O'Casey. Don't you know the rule?; you can only play 2nd row for Ireland if you're an O'...
    Just ask Mick O'Driscoll or Lee O'Cullen!!

    That last sentence seems to be sarcastic...Mick does have an O...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,407 ✭✭✭✭justsomebloke


    Has there been any citings as a result of this does anyone know?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,407 ✭✭✭✭justsomebloke




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭markc1184


    Both got 7 week bans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    markc1184 wrote: »
    Both got 7 week bans.

    Won't affect Paice but Hamilton will miss Scotland's summer tour.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,143 ✭✭✭locum-motion


    castie wrote: »
    That last sentence seems to be sarcastic...Mick does have an O...

    I know.
    Only the Lee O'Cullen bit was a joke.


Advertisement