Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Third level geometry problem

Options
  • 06-05-2012 11:12am
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 88 ✭✭


    I'm sitting the leaving cert at the moment and our teacher gave us a problem she said is 'third level standard'. Well if it is she's not finished her degree so we're probably just doing her homework for her. She has offered a monetary reward to anyone who gets it, so I'm hoping someone here can help.

    It's a circle of radius 5 bounded by a paralellogram, the task is to find the area of the paralellogram. No other information is given.

    Thanks to anyone who offers any help or guidance in advance.


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,603 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,619 ✭✭✭TheBody


    Do you mean like this?

    eii2.gif

    The area of a parallelogram is the base times the perpendicular height. Can you figure it out from here?

    (If this is the problem, it is not a third level question.)


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,961 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    TheBody wrote: »
    Do you mean like this?

    eii2.gif
    If it's like that, then the slope of the parallelogram needs to be known too - it affects the length of the base.

    If you draw this with a parallelogram with the angles at 90° - i.e. a square - then the base = height = 2r, so the area is 10x10=100.

    If you look at the picture, however, base > 2r. You can see this more clearly if you draw a horizontal line through the centre of the circle: the length of the line is 2r plus some extra on the sides, and that extra increases as the angle increases. So, the standard base x perp. height formula isn't enough on its own, because the base can't be calculated without the angle of the parallelogram slope.

    From out there on the moon, international politics look so petty. You want to grab a politician by the scruff of the neck and drag him a quarter of a million miles out and say, ‘Look at that, you son of a bitch’.

    — Edgar Mitchell, Apollo 14 Astronaut



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,619 ✭✭✭TheBody


    bnt wrote: »
    If it's like that, then the slope of the parallelogram needs to be known too - it affects the length of the base.

    If you draw this with a parallelogram with the angles at 90° - i.e. a square - then the base = height = 2r, so the area is 10x10=100.

    If you look at the picture, however, base > 2r. You can see this more clearly if you draw a horizontal line through the centre of the circle: the length of the line is 2r plus some extra on the sides, and that extra increases as the angle increases. So, the standard base x perp. height formula isn't enough on its own, because the base can't be calculated without the angle of the parallelogram slope.

    Yes, good point; you would need the angle too as you suggested. Well spotted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,115 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    Maybe the problem is worded incorrectly?

    If a circle of radius r bounds a parallelogram, find the area of the parallelogram.

    Something like that.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,961 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    It is possible to show that the parallelogram must be a rhombus (equal sides) - see here for example. But that doesn't change the problem.

    If it's the other way around, with the parallelogram inscribed inside the circle, that's different. The only way you get all four vertices of the parallelogram on the circle is if the parallelogram is a rectangle (see here).

    However, the area of that rectangle is not the same in all cases, and it depends on its sides. (You can have a valid rectangle inscribed in a circle with a width of zero, and therefore an area of zero!)

    From out there on the moon, international politics look so petty. You want to grab a politician by the scruff of the neck and drag him a quarter of a million miles out and say, ‘Look at that, you son of a bitch’.

    — Edgar Mitchell, Apollo 14 Astronaut



Advertisement