Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

flint

  • 15-04-2012 10:39PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,516 ✭✭✭


    http//www.boards.ie/vbulletin/picture.php?albumid=2075&picture


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23 jimmyarch


    can you re-post please, can't see the image!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,516 ✭✭✭Maudi


    jimmyarch wrote: »
    can you re-post please, can't see the image!
    its just not doing what its supposed to but il try again


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,291 ✭✭✭✭Standard Toaster


    picture.php?albumid=2075&pictureid=12528

    .


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,231 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    A dihedral burin?
    Tell us more :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23 jimmyarch


    cool! nice little artefact there!

    thanks for the image. Its a blade of heavily patinated flint. Its difficult to tell in the photograph whether the piece has edge damage on each side or just very informal retouch, it would help to have a close-up and a photo of the back of the piece.

    The proximal end of the blade is still intact and displays a platform preparation scar. It would be good to see the bulb on the back, might tell us the type of hammer used to remove this from the core.

    If the proximal end had been removed then I would be tempted to suggest that this is a very in formal backed-blade microlith but the proximal end remains. It's impossible to date as it is not a clear, formal typology but its blade nature and small size suggests that it may be early Mesolithic or early Neolithic but this is guesswork.

    Some photos may help, where was it found?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,516 ✭✭✭Maudi


    jimmyarch wrote: »
    cool! nice little artefact there!

    thanks for the image. Its a blade of heavily patinated flint. Its difficult to tell in the photograph whether the piece has edge damage on each side or just very informal retouch, it would help to have a close-up and a photo of the back of the piece.

    The proximal end of the blade is still intact and displays a platform preparation scar. It would be good to see the bulb on the back, might tell us the type of hammer used to remove this from the core.

    If the proximal end had been removed then I would be tempted to suggest that this is a very in formal backed-blade microlith but the proximal end remains. It's impossible to date as it is not a clear, formal typology but its blade nature and small size suggests that it may be early Mesolithic or early Neolithic but this is guesswork.

    Some photos may help, where was it found?
    thanks jimmyarch for your detailed reply...very interesting to read it..i was struck dumb by it myself when i spotted it lyiing in the dirt...its incredible to think of a man chipping away to make it and thousands of years later i pick it up....humbling...i found it on a construction site in greystones wicklow in a spoilheap away from site..so alas maybe context is gone..anyway im having trouble loading pics but il get at it again...seems to me to have a row (both edges) of serrations??bit like a saw if you know what i mean...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,516 ✭✭✭Maudi




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,291 ✭✭✭✭Standard Toaster


    There you go Maudi :)

    picture.php?albumid=2082&pictureid=12557


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,516 ✭✭✭Maudi


    There you go Maudi :)

    picture.php?albumid=2082&pictureid=12557
    frig it..thanks again s.t.


Advertisement