Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Govt to sell national lottery licence to camelot

Options
  • 04-04-2012 4:35pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,273 ✭✭✭


    Govt to sell national lottery licence to camelot

    Ok, not exactly but very close to what the govt are thinking of doing:

    http://www.rte.ie/news/2012/0404/government-announces-changes-to-lotto-licence.html
    Govt reveals terms for new 20-year licence to operate National Lottery

    Updated: 15:08, Wednesday, 4 April 2012
    The current National Lottery licence will expire in June 2013

    The State hopes to raise hundreds of millions of euro by selling a licence to operate the lottery over a 20-year period.

    The level of money for good causes will be maintained at 30% of lottery sales.

    By selling the lottery licence over a 20-year period and seeking an upfront payment, the Government hopes to raise significant funds to put towards the National Children's Hospital.

    There is considerable interest in the licence.

    Camelot, which runs the UK lottery, said it welcomed today's announcement and was glad to hear the Government was moving forward.

    Legislation detailing the proposals is due to be published by July and the Government aims to have it enacted by October.

    Bids for the new licence, which is due to begin in July 2013, will be sought early next year.

    An Post National Lottery Company is the holder of the current licence, which it won in a tendering process in late 2001.

    The licence was due to end last year but the Government extended it until June 2013 in order to give them time to make changes to the licensing process.

    Does anyone have faith the govt will do this in an efficient & effective manner which will be to the national benefit ?

    Or, do you think they will fcuk it up comprehensively leaving the public drastically short-changed 'M50 toll bridge' style ?

    My money is on 'they will fcuk it up comprehensively leaving the public drastically short-changed 'M50 toll bridge' style'.

    How do you think the transfer of the National Lottery licence will be handled ? 80 votes

    The govt will completely mess this up
    0% 0 votes
    The govt will do a good job handling this
    87% 70 votes
    Too cool to care
    12% 10 votes
    Tagged:


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,513 ✭✭✭donalg1


    Sure thats their own business


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,024 Mod ✭✭✭✭G_R


    Morlar wrote: »
    Govt to sell national lottery licence to camelot

    Ok, not exactly but very close to what the govt are thinking of doing:

    http://www.rte.ie/news/2012/0404/government-announces-changes-to-lotto-licence.html
    Govt reveals terms for new 20-year licence to operate National Lottery

    Updated: 15:08, Wednesday, 4 April 2012
    The current National Lottery licence will expire in June 2013

    The State hopes to raise hundreds of millions of euro by selling a licence to operate the lottery over a 20-year period.

    The level of money for good causes will be maintained at 30% of lottery sales.

    By selling the lottery licence over a 20-year period and seeking an upfront payment, the Government hopes to raise significant funds to put towards the National Children's Hospital.

    There is considerable interest in the licence.

    Camelot, which runs the UK lottery, said it welcomed today's announcement and was glad to hear the Government was moving forward.

    Legislation detailing the proposals is due to be published by July and the Government aims to have it enacted by October.

    Bids for the new licence, which is due to begin in July 2013, will be sought early next year.

    An Post National Lottery Company is the holder of the current licence, which it won in a tendering process in late 2001.

    The licence was due to end last year but the Government extended it until June 2013 in order to give them time to make changes to the licensing process.

    Does anyone have faith the govt will do this in an efficient & effective manner which will be to the national benefit ?

    Or, do you think they will fcuk it up comprehensively leaving the public drastically short-changed 'M50 toll bridge' style ?

    My money is on 'they will fcuk it up comprehensively leaving the public drastically short-changed 'M50 toll bridge' style'.
    Honestly don't see how it could be fecked up tbh. Seems to be a pretty simple concept...


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭Seachmall


    I would like to purchase this license, who do I need to speak to?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,023 ✭✭✭Dostoevsky


    Seachmall wrote: »
    I would like to purchase this license, who do I need to speak to?

    Denis O'Brien?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,065 ✭✭✭Fighting Irish


    Morlar wrote: »
    Govt to sell national lottery licence to camelot

    Ok, not exactly but very close to what the govt are thinking of doing:

    :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,273 ✭✭✭Morlar


    :rolleyes

    Wow, that's great ! You're so cool !!


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,065 ✭✭✭Fighting Irish


    Honestly don't see how it could be fecked up tbh. Seems to be a pretty simple concept...

    They made me take out a huge mortgage, and now i'm fooked, so they'll defo fook this up!!!!!1


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    As long as the charitable donations stay the same I don't really see any problem.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,065 ✭✭✭Fighting Irish


    Morlar wrote: »
    Wow, that's great ! You're so cool !!

    :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,698 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    They made me take out a huge mortgage, and now i'm fooked, so they'll defo fook this up!!!!!1

    Did they really?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,065 ✭✭✭Fighting Irish


    ColHol wrote: »
    Did they really?

    Well it was either them, the bankers or the developers, can't really make my mind up ha


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,707 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    The license is going up for general tender so it doesn't automatically mean that Camelot will get it.

    An Post could put in a bid for it.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,555 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    I await Joe Higgins telling us that the machines that spin the lottery balls are an important piece of national infrastructure and that there's going to be a race to the bottom with jackpots.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,273 ✭✭✭Morlar


    Clegg wrote: »
    The license is going up for general tender so it doesn't automatically mean that Camelot will get it.

    An Post could put in a bid for it.

    If company A can make more money out of it they will win it over company B. Company A can do a million little things to increase their profits, such as decrease the odds of you winning, increase the number of lottery balls, increase the number of draws, decrease the amounts in prizes, decrease the amount or percentage of profits going to charitable causes, cap prizes and so on and on and on. Ths is one of those times when the highest bidder is not necessarily in the national interest. We will get a bundle of cash upfront but this will be a licence to print money which will flow out of this country until the year 2033.

    This is why states in America have very active and competent Lottery Commissions, same as UK has an active Lottery commission. Also they generally do not give away the licence for 20 years at a time as it kills competition. Irish govt's have a long history of myopic idiocy in decision making involving a 'big pile cash' reward, look at our national resources, fisheries to the eu, M50 toll bridge, mining rights and so on.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 216 ✭✭AboutTwoFiddy


    ScumLord wrote: »
    As long as the charitable donations stay the same I don't really see any problem.

    That's not the way it works. Initially, when the lottery was set up a certain proportion was supposed to cover costs and the rest handed out to worthy costs. What actually happens is all the monies raised goes to the government and then they pick and chose who gets money.

    Have no confidence in the government handling this, there'll be brown envelopes passing hands and it will be sold to the biggest crook/donator.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,061 ✭✭✭benway


    Robbo wrote: »
    I await Joe Higgins telling us that the machines that spin the lottery balls are an important piece of national infrastructure and that there's going to be a race to the bottom with jackpots.

    Wouldn't it be better to keep the profits in this country though? Couple of hundred million up front for a license worth a hell of a lot more in the long run seems myopic to me.

    Someone, please think of Stokes Kennedy Crowley.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,978 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Stupid misleading threadline.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    If it's not costing the state and is making money why sell it? You have to remember this is keeping lots of jobs going. Will this change under privatisation? Will the profits be leaving the country?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,273 ✭✭✭Morlar


    PogMoThoin wrote: »
    If it's not costing the state and is making money why sell it? You have to remember this is keeping lots of jobs going. Will this change under privatisation? Will the profits be leaving the country?

    If camelot win the licence that'll be a decision for their shareholders.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    Morlar wrote: »
    If camelot win the licence that'll be a decision for their shareholders.

    Exactly, so the Government needs to consider whether the sale is good for this country and not just a cash in.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,273 ✭✭✭Morlar


    PogMoThoin wrote: »
    Exactly, so the Government needs to consider whether the sale is good for this country and not just a cash in.

    Well that's the question - do you have faith in this govt to do that ? Take a long look at their track record of negotiating on the national interest. Consiider also that this is a 20 yr licence, practically unheard of, it seems in this case purely to increase the short term cash flow. Even camelot in the uk were under absolute govt scrutiny for the entire duration of their licence and were made to part fund the olympics out of it.

    The only good news in this is that the greens are no longer a factor : "Increase the ticket-prices up the profit margins so long as those balls are bio-degradable."


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,462 ✭✭✭✭WoollyRedHat


    Keeping in concept with the Lottery, they should award the licence to the next winner.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,482 ✭✭✭Kidchameleon


    Do you reckon Camelot will decrease the odds of winning? Do you ever see their equivalent to winning streak with Dale Winton, the prizes are completely ****e, the Irish one dwarfs it.

    I can see this being a bad thing for people who enjoy playing lotto.


    (in before lotto tax on stupidity etc etc)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,997 ✭✭✭Adyx


    mike65 wrote: »
    Stupid misleading threadline.
    You read it as cameltoe too?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,273 ✭✭✭Morlar


    Adyx wrote: »
    You read it as cameltoe too?

    'Camel-Lottoe' ♫

    Not that misleading after all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,068 ✭✭✭Xenophile


    We do not need An Post getting involved wasting tax payers money on their own efforts and that of consultants and advisers.

    No way should An Post be involved in competing with private enterprise and this also includes competing with newsagents selling greeting cards.....................! The newsagent is not subsidized and cannot afford losses. Is there any way that An Post can be told to get more efficient at delivering mail at a cheaper price, or are we going to pay for this by way of unnecessary expense.

    The Forum on Spirituality has been closed for years. Please bring it back, there are lots of Spiritual people in Ireland and elsewhere.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,118 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    This little nugget.

    "According to the Minister, there will be a competitive process and the fixed percentage of 30.5pc of annual turnover for good causes will be retained under the new licence"

    You could turnover €1 million this year. You make a profit of €50,000 after the cost of business. That's how a normal business works.

    With this you give the Government €400 million up front and €305000 a year for every €1 million of Turnover.

    Am I the only one not getting how insane this is to an investor. €400 million buys a lot of Mc Donald's.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,959 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    Morlar wrote: »
    Does anyone have faith the govt will do this in an efficient & effective manner which will be to the national benefit ?
    That's a trick question, right?

    Nothing about a National Lottery is to the "national benefit". It is a "zero-sum game". It does not create any wealth, it merely redistributes it. Money leaves the pockets of the people buying tickets, and lands in the pockets of the winners, the government, and the operator. From there it goes, in varying proportions, to charities, shareholders, employees, and the usual government tax uses. No more money is created at any point in the process.

    If you want a charity to benefit, then give money to that charity. If everyone did that, the charities would get more than they get from a lottery, since there would be no "middlemen" slicing a chunk off it.

    From out there on the moon, international politics look so petty. You want to grab a politician by the scruff of the neck and drag him a quarter of a million miles out and say, ‘Look at that, you son of a bitch’.

    — Edgar Mitchell, Apollo 14 Astronaut



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,366 ✭✭✭micropig


    Dostoevsky wrote: »
    Denis O'Brien?

    I will eat my hat if it turns out he's not going to be involved somehow in this


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 126 ✭✭Joko


    This little nugget.

    "According to the Minister, there will be a competitive process and the fixed percentage of 30.5pc of annual turnover for good causes will be retained under the new licence"

    You could turnover €1 million this year. You make a profit of €50,000 after the cost of business. That's how a normal business works.

    With this you give the Government €400 million up front and €305000 a year for every €1 million of Turnover.

    Am I the only one not getting how insane this is to an investor. €400 million buys a lot of Mc Donald's.

    It would be very easy for an investor to make loads from this, all they have to do is make the odds of winning a jackpot harder.


Advertisement