Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

185 left stranded at Shannon

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 917 ✭✭✭Joe 90


    When I saw the thread title I assumed a Cessna 185. Seriously, I wondered how the f a C185 could be stranded.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 570 ✭✭✭EI-DOR


    Funny, I was thinking the exact same Joe when I seen it!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭xflyer


    Well it could have been worse, there might have been 787 left stranded.:P or 1011.

    They were a bit unlucky though but 350 passengers trump 185.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,221 ✭✭✭BrianD


    Could Aer Lingus be the first to coin a new excuse that will probably become standard excuse within the industry ...

    "“The flight was cancelled due to technical issues within the fleet."

    Translated this means that there are other passengers more important than you or are going to cost us more than you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,702 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    BrianD wrote: »
    Translated this means that there are other passengers more important than you or are going to cost us more than you.

    The latter I'd say.

    They had a choice to either put 185 people into hotels in the Shannon region or 350 in Dublin - do the math!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Dacian


    coylemj wrote: »
    ......They had a choice to either put 185 people into hotels in the Shannon region or 350 in Dublin - do the math!
    Unfortunately in this day and age most company is run by numbers people. So 185 costs less than 300+ (An EI A330 has up to 327 capacity according to wikipedia)

    Apparently they were all flown out today instead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,534 ✭✭✭Zonda999


    So the "350" stranded in Dublin couldn't possibly be the case seeing as an EI A330 can only carry 322 people, doesnt change tbhings a whole lot but there was no need for clearly inaccurate figures to be used


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,984 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    The technical issue was a catering truck having struck an aircraft that had just parked on stand, thereby throwing the schedule into disarray. Aer Lingus did not deliberately abandon anyone.
    regards
    Stovepipe


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,102 ✭✭✭Stinicker


    Better to strand 185 than 350 passengers anyday. I'd still be mad though if I was one of the 185 stuck in Shannon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 Turbo Porter


    Omni or Condor 767 to the rescue as in the past.Then again it was a measured disruption in that 185 in the local 3 stars in the SNN region for one night...cheaper than hiring in an aircraft and crew.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,246 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    Aer Lingus A330 EI-DAA operated SNN-BOS today as EI2135, presumably with the pax involved. http://flightaware.com/live/flight/EIN2135


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 3,807 ✭✭✭castie


    Stovepipe wrote: »
    The technical issue was a catering truck having struck an aircraft that had just parked on stand, thereby throwing the schedule into disarray. Aer Lingus did not deliberately abandon anyone.
    regards
    Stovepipe

    They sent their plane to Dublin instead.
    If thats not intentionally choosing to let the shannon passengers without an aircraft I dont know what is.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 722 ✭✭✭urajoke


    Simple economics I'm afraid. It's cheaper to dump on 185 than 350 (pax+crew+round up for sensationalisation maybe) !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭roundymac


    @stovepipe, can you clear up something for me please, was it one or two aircraft were out of service? The initial reports were saying that one went tech and the other was hit by a truck. So was a journo being (a) lazy,(b) unable to understand the facts (c) beefing up the story to make more dramatic?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭Ennisman


    Zonda999 wrote: »
    So the "350" stranded in Dublin couldn't possibly be the case seeing as an EI A330 can only carry 322 people, doesnt change tbhings a whole lot but there was no need for clearly inaccurate figures to be used

    Read the article. No one said all 350 went on the one plane.

    The 350 from the total pax from the two planes which were grounded at Dublin.

    Not "clearly inaccurate figures used". You didn't read the article.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,085 ✭✭✭Pacing Mule


    Ennisman wrote: »
    Read the article. No one said all 350 went on the one plane.

    The 350 from the total pax from the two planes which were grounded at Dublin.

    Not "clearly inaccurate figures used". You didn't read the article.


    Em ...
    Aer Lingus decided to cancel the Shannon/Boston flight and send the Airbus jet to Dublin, where more than 350 passengers were grounded because of issues with their aircraft.

    That clearly states more than 350 passengers were grounded in Dublin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭Ennisman


    Em ...



    That clearly states more than 350 passengers were grounded in Dublin.

    No one is arguing with that. They were from two different planes. One went tech the other was damaged.

    The other guy was arguing that the figure of 350 was wrong because an A330 can only take 322 pax. Also correct.

    The figure of 350 is still correct because they were from two planes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,279 ✭✭✭Su Campu


    Em ...



    That clearly states more than 350 passengers were grounded in Dublin.

    Yes, but....
    Its understood that two planes were taken out of service at Dublin because one aircraft suffered a technical issue while another jet was damaged after it was struck by a ground vehicle.

    PS. A nice lack of English punctuation shown by the journalist there, leaving out the apostrophe in "Its understood that....." :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭Ennisman


    Don't be a plonker. That's an issue for the sub-editor or copy taker. It doesn't mean the journo left it out.

    Haven't you very little to be worrying you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,085 ✭✭✭Pacing Mule


    Ah my bad - had not read the rest of the article when I posted.

    Apologies.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,279 ✭✭✭Su Campu


    Ennisman wrote: »
    Don't be a plonker. That's an issue for the sub-editor or copy taker. It doesn't mean the journo left it out.

    Haven't you very little to be worrying you.

    Whatever, it is just an illustration of the widespread lack of English basics that's to be found in almost every written article/blog/post nowadays.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭Ennisman


    Su Campu wrote: »
    Whatever, it is just an illustration of the widespread lack of English basics that's to be found in almost every written article/blog/post nowadays.

    Fair point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭Ennisman


    Ah my bad - had not read the rest of the article when I posted.

    Apologies.


    I had to read it a few times too.

    I think the A330-200 series takes even less again than the 322 mentioned earlier so some were still left behind.


Advertisement