whatdoestheinternetthink.net of wrestling stuff

CMpunked

So i came across whatdoestheinternetthink.net and it may not be 100% accurate, it is interesting some of the results:

WWE got Negative 75.2% and 24.4% positive

Pro wrestling got a whopping 97.4% positive

TNA is a bit more divided and got a 57% positive and 42.3% negative.

WCW got a hilarious 99.2% negative

The undertaker got 97.7% positive reaction

Triple H is negative 65.5% and positive 34.3%

John Cena, in following with internet tradition these days, is nearly split in half at 55.8% and 44.2%


The figures are interesting but i think they would be different if they used google as well as bing as google obviously give a much more comprehensive search result.

Charisteas

Hulk Hogan 98.7 negative.

Seems pretty accurate to me!

GTR63

Charisteas wrote: »

Hulk Hogan 98.7 negative.

Seems pretty accurate to me!

Those 1.3 must of played Saints Row The Third or taken his interviews to be shoot comedies.

A Primal Nut

How does it work exactly? Bertie Ahern, for example, gets 100% positive. Just to give one non-wrestling example for comparison purposes. So yeah, I don't think it's quite an accurate reflection. Still funny though!

CMpunked

A Primal Nut wrote: »

How does it work exactly? Bertie Ahern, for example, gets 100% positive. Just to give one non-wrestling example for comparison purposes. So yeah, I don't think it's quite an accurate reflection.

Well thats only 16 hits overall, a lot of the wrestling ones are into the hundreds of thousands so it may not be accurate to the T with the bigger worldwide things but certainly its not a good gauge for less well known stuff. Say like, The Rubberbandits.
How it works is by doing a search for the term you give it and any other positive or negative terms used in the same body of text. So if you search "bertie ahern" and it comes across a line which is something like "Bertie ahern is a great big boll!x" then it would probably rate that as being a positive.