Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Land Lease Sale

  • 20-03-2012 5:05pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1


    Hi I looking for some advice

    I recently sold a plot of land in Thailand in a development which was held on a 30 year lease. When I bought the lease originally it was stated that the total area of the land was 400 square meters.

    So a couple of months ago I sold on the lease to another party. Everything fine, money was paid, done and dusted.

    Today I got an email from the lawyer of the new owner saying that when the new owner went to layout the plans for a house he is going to build he found that the total land area was only 360 square meters, 40sqm short. The lawyer said that the new owner wants 10% of the purchase money refunded as the contract said it was 400sqm.

    Being that it was just a transfer of a lease that was originally sold as 400sqm I would have thought that the owner of the development was the one they should be dealing with as I sold on the lease in good faith.

    Anybody have any thoughts on this?
    Thanks


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,316 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    I'd wonder was something built in a corner of the plot, and that a cheeky neighbour had put their extension to their playroom.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭dermot_sheehan


    Advice from a qualified thai lawyer would be appropriate.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement