Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Harcourt Street Line Development

  • 19-03-2012 9:54pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 210 ✭✭


    Anyone know what's going on the old trackbed between Leopardstown Rd and Brewery Rd?

    The wall on the Leopardstown road end has been knocked and they seem to be paving it. Also a lot of activity at the other end.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭dowlingm




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,549 ✭✭✭✭Judgement Day


    At least it will safeguard the trackbed so that the Luas can eventually be rerouted through from Sandyford to Carrickmines and the farcical, but aesthetically pleasing, deviation abandoned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,258 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    At least it will safeguard the trackbed so that the Luas can eventually be rerouted through from Sandyford to Carrickmines and the farcical, but aesthetically pleasing, deviation abandoned.

    Good idea. First building to CPO on the old trackbed is the Sunshine Home; them poor orphans :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    Good idea. First building to CPO on the old trackbed is the Sunshine Home; them poor orphans :D
    The Troika will be putting them on the auction block any day now so no worries.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,463 ✭✭✭CIE


    At least it will safeguard the trackbed so that the Luas can eventually be rerouted through from Sandyford to Carrickmines and the farcical, but aesthetically pleasing, deviation abandoned.
    Bike paths don't preserve railways for that purpose. It'll stay a bike path. There's too much of a passenger base in Ballyogan for the Luas to be removed from that route.

    One of the earliest bike paths is the former North Shore Line out of Chicago (terminating at Waukegan, Illinois), which was converted to what is now known as the Robert McClory Bike Path, originally named the North Shore Bike Path, shortly after the Chicago, North Shore and Milwaukee Railroad went out of business in 1963. The same fate awaits the original alignment of the Harcourt Street Line through Sandyford, Leopardstown and Foxrock. Video below shows what the North Shore route used to look like as active...an electrified railway that ran onto the Chicago "L" system (using third rail there, and overhead wires with trolley poles on "home rails")...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,280 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    At least it will safeguard the trackbed so that the Luas can eventually be rerouted through from Sandyford to Carrickmines and the farcical, but aesthetically pleasing, deviation abandoned.

    Ah yes, the farcical deviation that serves all the housing estates around Leopardstown Valley - replace it with a route through green fields with no population centres.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    lxflyer wrote: »
    Ah yes, the farcical deviation that serves all the housing estates around Leopardstown Valley - replace it with a route through green fields with no population centres.

    But thats what we do with new lines isnt it? or is it different in that Duberlin place?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,280 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The Green Line south of the Leopardstown Valley area is going through green fields, however the alignment immediately south of Sandyford is serving a sizeable population (unlike the original line which only served a vastly smaller number).

    It's utterly farcical that certain people cannot see that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,549 ✭✭✭✭Judgement Day


    Given that it was intended to convert the Green Line into a Metro operation in the long term, the original Harcourt Street alignment would have been the logical route to follow. The existing terminus at Brides Glen doesn't even line up with the old Brides Glen viaduct which the further extension of the Luas or Metro was to use.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 210 ✭✭bbuzz


    Given that it was intended to convert the Green Line into a Metro operation in the long term, the original Harcourt Street alignment would have been the logical route to follow. The existing terminus at Brides Glen doesn't even line up with the old Brides Glen viaduct which the further extension of the Luas or Metro was to use.

    Is that not because there has to be a different alignment to get to Bray since the M50 and M11 are in the way and it's not going to head into Shankhill.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,258 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    bbuzz wrote: »
    Is that not because there has to be a different alignment to get to Bray since the M50 and M11 are in the way and it's not going to head into Shankhill.

    The M 50 isn't interfering with the trackbed at all. It was rerouted via Ballyogan to serve housing; developer levies part paying for it's construction costs. The M 11 cuts through the bed just before it meets the M 50 but it could easily be raised over it if need be.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,093 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Great idea in general, but... oh dear... why are they using shared use at junctions?

    http://www.dlrcoco.ie/aboutus/councildepartments/planning/proposedpart8schemes/pc0211-breweryroadtoleopardstownroad/#d.en.6479


Advertisement