Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

LED House lights

  • 16-02-2012 12:42PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,627 ✭✭✭


    Can anyone offer advice on taking indoor pictures where the ceiling lights are the new LED downlighter ones rather than traditional light builbs?

    They come out very yellow at the moment

    thanks


Comments

  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭melekalikimaka


    Can anyone offer advice on taking indoor pictures where the ceiling lights are the new LED downlighter ones rather than traditional light builbs?

    They come out very yellow at the moment

    thanks


    shoot raw and adjust wb


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59 ✭✭McVitae


    Can anyone offer advice on taking indoor pictures where the ceiling lights are the new LED downlighter ones rather than traditional light builbs?

    They come out very yellow at the moment

    thanks

    Check the CRI (colour rendering index) of the LEDs. Unlike incandescents some LEDs are very poor at rendering colour. Others are OK


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85 ✭✭hunglikeaflee


    The best way to do it is set your W/B.

    IF not, do as melekalikimaka said, raw and adjust W/B later but this way you might not get the exact colours which might be important.

    As for the CRI, I wouldn’t bother unless they are the high quality lamps. First you will get it hard to get the CRI you might get the colour temperature of the lamp. Second with these cheap LEDs the colour will change very quickly as soon as you start to use them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 288 ✭✭thedarkroom


    You must be using a Nikon, they are often have colour correction problems with artificial light. I have a D300 and its auto white balance has difficulty with tungsten light so I usually set the balance manually to 'incandescent' to get around it. In your case, I reckon that the best option would be ti use a custom white balance rather than using any of the camera's presets. This can be done in the menu system and would involve taking a reading from a white card and saving the result. Obviously, this will only work properly where the LED's are the primary light source. If you have a variety of different light types then you will have further problems because if you correct for one light then the cast from the other will get worse.
    Another alternative would be to shoot on RAW as suggested by melekalikimaka and for a test shot to include a grey card. When you open in RAW, use the grey card to set your mid tones and save this conversion to your RAW presets so that you can then apply that adjustment to any other selected image.
    See here - http://www.lastolite.com/ezybalance.php#
    And a tutorial here - http://www.lastoliteschoolofphotography.com/tag/ezybalance
    It shows two options to do either in camera or afterwards in Photoshop. I have one of these little reflectors and it's very handy. I got mine here - http://www.berminghamcameras.ie/store/index.php?target=products&product_id=3901


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,627 ✭✭✭Sgt Pepper 64


    You must be using a Nikon, they are often have colour correction problems with artificial light. I have a D300 and its auto white balance has difficulty with tungsten light so I usually set the balance manually to 'incandescent' to get around it. In your case, I reckon that the best option would be ti use a custom white balance rather than using any of the camera's presets. This can be done in the menu system and would involve taking a reading from a white card and saving the result. Obviously, this will only work properly where the LED's are the primary light source. If you have a variety of different light types then you will have further problems because if you correct for one light then the cast from the other will get worse.
    Another alternative would be to shoot on RAW as suggested by melekalikimaka and for a test shot to include a grey card. When you open in RAW, use the grey card to set your mid tones and save this conversion to your RAW presets so that you can then apply that adjustment to any other selected image.
    See here - http://www.lastolite.com/ezybalance.php#
    And a tutorial here - http://www.lastoliteschoolofphotography.com/tag/ezybalance
    It shows two options to do either in camera or afterwards in Photoshop. I have one of these little reflectors and it's very handy. I got mine here - http://www.berminghamcameras.ie/store/index.php?target=products&product_id=3901

    No its a Canon 50d, the problem is I want a good enough aperture and low ISO, as there isnt a lot of natural light in there, so I end up turning on the lights.
    I just have to do a lot of test shots and playing with settings like you say.
    Ultimately I want to blow this up to A3 size, so I want it as sharp and non pixelated as possible.

    thanks for the links and advice


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭mloc


    I never understand why anyone with an SLR shoots JPEG (unless for speed).

    I'd say shoot RAW, take a gray card and then adjust WB in post-pro. Shouldn't be a problem if the LEDs are consistent. It's fine if they are crap, once they are consistently crap.


Advertisement