Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Not taken off Interest Only at correct time.

  • 25-01-2012 12:41pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 638 ✭✭✭


    Hello everyone.

    I could really use some advice on a problem with my mortgage.

    18-20 months ago, I signed a 6 month contract for Interest Only Payments.
    Today I recieved a letter showing my outstanding balance and it is the same as it was a year ago. I rang up and was told that ive only been making interest only payments for all this time.
    They are investigating it further before calling me back.

    What recourse do i have with this?

    I do not want to be charged the extra interest on my principle as its not being reducing for the last 1+ year.
    Is it a fair solution that they change the principle to reflect what it should be, and I pay the difference that i should of been charged?

    Can they force me to start paying principle now and get away with the extra years interest?

    Thanks


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,718 ✭✭✭whippet


    theTinker wrote: »
    Hello everyone.

    I could really use some advice on a problem with my mortgage.

    18-20 months ago, I signed a 6 month contract for Interest Only Payments.
    Today I recieved a letter showing my outstanding balance and it is the same as it was a year ago. I rang up and was told that ive only been making interest only payments for all this time.
    They are investigating it further before calling me back.

    What recourse do i have with this?

    I do not want to be charged the extra interest on my principle as its not being reducing for the last 1+ year.
    Is it a fair solution that they change the principle to reflect what it should be, and I pay the difference that i should of been charged?

    Can they force me to start paying principle now and get away with the extra years interest?

    Thanks

    did you notice that your repayments were the same?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Melendez


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 638 ✭✭✭theTinker


    whippet wrote: »
    did you notice that your repayments were the same?

    I didnt check the payments were any different than the previous. Just that the payments were coming out from the account.

    The first time I noticed it was today when i compared my oustanding balance to my previous one as i expected it to be lower.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 638 ✭✭✭theTinker


    Melendez wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    That's what I would like to do, I want my principle to be where it should be. But I dont want to be charged extra interest because they didnt switch my account back proper.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Melendez


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    The thing is, if your repayment didn't change, then your principle is still where it "should be".

    That is, when you're making normal repayments, you're repaying the interest + part of the principle.

    When you switch to interest only, you just pay back the interest without reducing your principle (effectively "pausing" your mortgage).

    So if your repayments haven't gone up after the interest only period, then you've still only been paying back enough to cover the interest, and there's no reason why your principle would reduce.

    You could ask them to offest a certain % of the last 12 months' payments against the principle, but then you would be behind on your interest repayments and would have to catch back up with them.

    Although it's a pain that they haven't been applying it correctly, you're not actually out of pocket. Not yet anyway, though it does mean that you've paid a years' more interest than you need to.

    A reasonable compromise would be an "interest freeze", where they freeze the interest for a year (or however long you were incorrectly on the wrong repayment), and you only repay on the principle. At the end of that period then, you are where you "should be", and you can resume paying the full repayment.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 638 ✭✭✭theTinker


    Melendez wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    My mortgage is very low comparing to most, My electricity bill often outweighs it. So I never really looked into it. Theres just always been plenty of savings in the account to take care of things.

    I can definitely offer them the money up front in a lump sum. Its just sitting there. Hopefully they will like that option. Thanks for the input.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 638 ✭✭✭theTinker


    When i say should be, i mean should be as in if the mistake never happeed. Like my balance is the same now as it was last years. Where as it should be lower and i should of been charged princple + interest.

    I might be a bit confused by what you mean that im not out of pocket but also that I've payed a years extra interest that i shouldnt of.

    thanks for your solution suggestion, I didnt think of that. I will offer both to them when they ring me back and hopefully they will take one of them.

    Thanks for the input.
    seamus wrote: »
    The thing is, if your repayment didn't change, then your principle is still where it "should be".

    That is, when you're making normal repayments, you're repaying the interest + part of the principle.

    When you switch to interest only, you just pay back the interest without reducing your principle (effectively "pausing" your mortgage).

    So if your repayments haven't gone up after the interest only period, then you've still only been paying back enough to cover the interest, and there's no reason why your principle would reduce.

    You could ask them to offest a certain % of the last 12 months' payments against the principle, but then you would be behind on your interest repayments and would have to catch back up with them.

    Although it's a pain that they haven't been applying it correctly, you're not actually out of pocket. Not yet anyway, though it does mean that you've paid a years' more interest than you need to.

    A reasonable compromise would be an "interest freeze", where they freeze the interest for a year (or however long you were incorrectly on the wrong repayment), and you only repay on the principle. At the end of that period then, you are where you "should be", and you can resume paying the full repayment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,518 ✭✭✭✭dudara


    Moved to Banking & Insurance & Pensions

    dudara


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭rameire


    may i suggest that you contact the bank with the following.

    have them calculate what the actual capital and interest repayment should have been when the account was supposed to roll off the interest only option.
    then ask them to calculate what the interest amount would have been for the period if you were paying the capital and interest.
    and ask them what the current balance should be now if you were paying capital and interest.

    ask them to credit the interest to the mortgage that in theory was overcharged on your mortgage and that you will reduce the balance by the amout required to get the balance to what it should be if payments were being made as capital and interest.
    hope it makes sence.

    🌞 3.8kwp, 🌞 Clonee, Dub.🌞



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 638 ✭✭✭theTinker


    makes perfect sense. Thanks for the suggestion.
    Im writing a letter to them tomorrow as the phone call has not recieved any response back from thier 'investigation team'.
    I'd rather it in writing anyways.
    rameire wrote: »
    may i suggest that you contact the bank with the following.

    have them calculate what the actual capital and interest repayment should have been when the account was supposed to roll off the interest only option.
    then ask them to calculate what the interest amount would have been for the period if you were paying the capital and interest.
    and ask them what the current balance should be now if you were paying capital and interest.

    ask them to credit the interest to the mortgage that in theory was overcharged on your mortgage and that you will reduce the balance by the amout required to get the balance to what it should be if payments were being made as capital and interest.
    hope it makes sence.


Advertisement