Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Internal Company IM's

  • 18-01-2012 06:21PM
    #1
    Hosted Moderators Posts: 3,807 ✭✭✭


    Just curious.

    What rights do employee's have to prviacy if any with internal instant messaging across a company network?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,756 ✭✭✭demanufactured


    None


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,886 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    With an employer messaging system you should not have an expectation of privacy to the extent that the disclosure is work related, ie relevant employees can examine your messages but they should not disclose them to other members of staff (or of the public) without a genuine reason. For example, you might disclose that a close relative has developed cancer in an email to a colleague. An IT staff member might become privy to this information but disclosing it would likely be a disciplinary matter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 104 ✭✭Ms Minnie Mouse


    None. However, the people who can access your information have a duty to only disclose what is necessary where necessary. However, just remember that gossip travels. Don't discuss anything on business networks, whether IM or emails, that you wouldn't want people to know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,340 ✭✭✭Thoie


    None. However, the people who can access your information have a duty to only disclose what is necessary where necessary. However, just remember that gossip travels. Don't discuss anything on business networks, whether IM or emails, that you wouldn't want people to know.

    "What is necessary, where necessary" could include inappropriate remarks to a colleague that would constitute a breach of the company code of conduct - sexual harassment, bullying, etc.

    In reality if the company is relatively large, no-one's going to go looking unless there's been a complaint.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,929 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    While the right to privacy may be a legitimate topic for discussion, what sanction (if any) or potential action for redress (if any) does the OP have if his 'right' (if it exists) to privacy is breached?

    I can see that people are trying to extend intra-company communication to potential bullying and/or sexual harrassment, let's keep it to the issue of privacy which is the only thing the OP mentioned.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement