Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

TV Licensing in Ireland

  • 02-01-2012 11:25pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,663 ✭✭✭


    OK, I cant seem to get my head around this..


    "If your household, business or institution possesses a television or equipment capable of receiving a television signal, you are required by law to have a television licence. Even if the television or other equipment is broken and currently unable to receive a signal, it is regarded as capable of being repaired so it can receive a signal and you must hold a licence for it."

    I have a TV in which i do not watch LIVE,, I just use it to play the Xbox.. do not have Sky.. nor RTE TV3.. But yet am i still required to hold a licence ? in the UK, if you have a TV and not Watch Live TV then you are not required to hold one does this rule apply for here aswell ? so if a TV License guy called to my House,

    I am not required to leave him in to the house nor give my name, and if asked do i hold a TV License i can just tell him i dont need a tv license, that im not required to give a reason why.. or do i need to buy a TV that can not be Tuned into getting RTE ?


Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,991 ✭✭✭mathepac


    Cork24 wrote: »
    ... "If your household, business or institution possesses a television or equipment capable of receiving a television signal, you are required by law to have a television licence. ...
    Not again FFS. You have a telly, get a licence, because you need one for the telly, not for the channels you receive or watch or don't receive or don't watch or the use you choose to put your telly to. Simpelz

    If you have a dog you need a licence whether it walks, barks or not.

    If you prefer UK law, move there


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,663 ✭✭✭Cork24


    mathepac wrote: »
    Not again FFS. You have a telly, get a licence, because you need one for the telly, not for the channels you receive or watch or don't receive or don't watch or the use you choose to put your telly to. Simpelz

    If you have a dog you need a licence whether it walks, barks or not.

    If you prefer UK law, move there


    Dogs are considered property and are required to be registered under a license.

    Do you own a Radio and do you have a License for that ?

    I would like to knw is if i dont have RTE or no means for getting a Signal on my TV then their is really no need for a TV License which goes to RTE to pay for the likes of Pat Kenny


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,420 ✭✭✭✭athtrasna


    Cork24 wrote: »
    Do you own a Radio and do you have a License for that ?

    I would like to knw is if i dont have RTE or no means for getting a Signal on my TV then their is really no need for a TV License which goes to RTE to pay for the likes of Pat Kenny

    The TV licence replaces the radio license which was compulsory for all those with radios in the state..can't remember the dates that it changed, know we were told about it in college.

    The licence fee you pay by law if you own a television set does not just pay for RTE TV & radio, it also funds orchestras, choirs and independent broadcasters and producers. It is not an optional fee, it is the law.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,991 ✭✭✭mathepac


    mathepac wrote: »
    Not again FFS. You have a telly, get a licence, because you need one for the telly, not for the channels you receive or watch or don't receive or don't watch or the use you choose to put your telly to. Simpelz ...
    The answer was there, can you get your little head around that.

    If you'd ever bought a licence you'd know that you pay An Post on behalf of the Minister for Communications or whatever that portfolio is called now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,663 ✭✭✭Cork24


    my tv can receive a signal but the house i live in does not have a signal to receive as their is no Sky box nor a Cable coming into the house as it was cut years ago.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,477 ✭✭✭newbie2


    you own a TV - you need a license

    facepalm_4__large.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,865 ✭✭✭Syth


    The law is clear. If you have a TV, you need a TV licence.

    The law is clear about what you can and can't say to the TV licence man. You are required to state in writing whether you have or have not a TV. It is an offence to lie on that form. (I can't remember what part of what Act that is from now). You may not say "I don't require one" if you want, but if An Post sends you (via registered post or in person) the form under the act, you can either not send it back (and commit and offence) or must state whether you have or have not a TV, and it's an offence to lie.

    If you want to find a way around it, get rid of your TV, get a big monitor, and try to play games on that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,381 ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    Cork24 wrote: »
    my tv can receive a signal

    Therefore, you need a license, by law.

    Just get one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,492 ✭✭✭Sir Oxman


    newbie2 wrote: »
    you own a TV - you need a license

    facepalm_4__large.jpg

    If it doesn't have a tuner though?

    Q. Do I require a television Licence even though I am unable to receive RTÉ and other Irish regulated broadcasts?
    A. Yes. The position is that once you are in possession of a television set capable of receiving television broadcasts, you are required to have a television licence. Effectively, it is the set that is licensed, not the ability to receive television broadcasts.

    http://www.dcenr.gov.ie/Broadcasting/Frequently+Asked+Questions/Television+Licence+FAQ.htm#6


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 565 ✭✭✭Squall19


    If you could prove your TV is a monitor you can get away with it.

    All you have to do is.

    Take down all the aerials and satellites, outside your house, anything that can receive or send a signal.

    Hook up your xbox to the monitor, laptop, pc whatever you use for media.

    Watch your films, tv shows, etc through xbmc, rte player, bbc player, navi x, icefilms through your pc,xbox etc.

    Have a receipt for your tv/monitor saying it's monitor.Very important that part

    Tell the tv license man to go **** himself you have a monitor, not a tv.

    To beat it, before you let the dog out :D

    MO-001-HS_200.jpg

    http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MO-001-HS

    If you pay the license once they will hound you forever.

    Get a monitor my friend, like me.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 565 ✭✭✭Squall19


    Here is a 24" inch Philips Full HD monitor.

    For 151 euro, 9 euro less than the License.

    It has HDMI connection for your xbox, DVI, VGA for your pc, built in speakers.

    philips-244e1sb-24-wide-tft-screen-5ms.jpg

    http://www.pixmania.ie/ie/uk/4591511/art/philips/244e1sb-24-full-hd-tft-sc.html

    Sell your TV on adverts for as much as you can and your laughing:D

    Wont cost you a cent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,381 ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    Squall19 wrote: »
    If you could prove your TV is a monitor you can get away with it.

    Have a receipt for your tv/monitor saying it's monitor.Very important that part

    Tell the tv license man to go **** himself you have a monitor, not a tv.

    :eek:

    Incorrect. All false claims. If you have a TV, you have a TV, and you must have a TV license.

    Buy a TV license, or end up in court.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 565 ✭✭✭Squall19


    Paulw wrote: »
    :eek:

    Incorrect. All false claims. If you have a TV, you have a TV, and you must have a TV license.

    Buy a TV license, or end up in court.

    A monitor is not a TV.

    Is a bicycle a motorbike?:)

    Can I hook up a sky box or aerial to this.

    http://www.pixmania.ie/ie/uk/4591511/art/philips/244e1sb-24-full-hd-tft-sc.html

    No I can't

    Not a TV


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,381 ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    Squall19 wrote: »
    A monitor is not a TV.

    Can I hook up a sky box or aerial to this.

    http://www.pixmania.ie/ie/uk/4591511/art/philips/244e1sb-24-full-hd-tft-sc.html

    No I can't

    Not a TV

    Correct, that's not a TV, and doesn't require a TV license.

    However, that's not what the OP has. The OP has a TV, that is capable of receiving a TV signal, therefore needs a TV license. Maybe you missed that part. :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 565 ✭✭✭Squall19


    Paulw wrote: »
    Correct, that's not a TV, and doesn't require a TV license.

    However, that's not what the OP has. The OP has a TV, that is capable of receiving a TV signal, therefore needs a TV license. Maybe you missed that part. :rolleyes:

    The OP was talking about buying a new TV;)
    Cork24 wrote: »
    or do i need to buy a TV that can not be Tuned into getting RTE ?

    All he has to do is sell his current TV, buy the monitor I linked for 151 euro and no TV license.Wont cost him a penny.

    Monitor's are far better quality than TV's anyway.If your not going to use it as a TV get rid.

    Plus

    No 160 euro to pay to those crooks in charge.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,381 ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    Squall19 wrote: »
    The OP was talking about buying a new TV;)

    No, the OP has a TV. See the opening post in the thread :rolleyes: -
    Cork24 wrote: »
    I have a TV

    And -
    Cork24 wrote: »
    my tv can receive a signal

    The OP has a TV and needs a TV license.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 565 ✭✭✭Squall19


    Yes he has a TV at the moment.

    Moment, means for now.Not for ever.

    OP want's a way around paying TV license and is willing to buy a TV that can not be tuned into getting RTE, eg a monitor.
    Cork24 wrote: »
    or do i need to buy a TV that can not be Tuned into getting RTE ?

    Cork24 wrote: »

    I have a TV in which i do not watch LIVE,, I just use it to play the Xbox.

    Why would he need a TV, when he doesn't need it, Xbox has a HDMI connection, as do all modern monitors.

    OP needs to buy a monitor.

    Just like you need to buy petrol for a petrol car, diesel for a diesel car.

    Get it yet?

    Or do you work for revenue and want his money?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,991 ✭✭✭mathepac


    Squall19 wrote: »
    Yes he has a TV at the moment...
    So he needs a TV licence at the moment. What else is there to know? His future plans or your suggestions are irrelevant to his current situation.
    Squall19 wrote: »
    ... OP want's a way around paying TV license and is willing to buy a TV that can not be tuned into getting RTE, eg a monitor...
    His licence has nothing whatsoever to do with receiving or viewing RTE or any other channel; it has to do with possession of a TV.
    Squall19 wrote: »
    ...Or do you work for revenue and want his money?
    Revenue do not get involved in TV licensing matters; these are dealt with exclusively by An Post on behalf of the Minister for Communications. Get it yet?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 565 ✭✭✭Squall19


    TV can be moved in 2 seconds so he doesn't a license at the moment:)

    His current situation is he doesn't want to pay the license.

    He needs a monitor, which are very cheap now.

    What kind of an idiot pays for a TV license, when he doesn't need to.

    Why do you want OP to waste his money?

    Monitor = 150 euro for a good 24" for his XBOX

    Tv license = 160 euro for nothing, but a ****ty piece of paper.

    He is up 10 euro and has something to show for it, a brand new Full HD class monitor.

    OP does not need a TV, he doesn't need a TV license.He needs a monitor.

    Get it yet?

    Some people are very clever:rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 565 ✭✭✭Squall19


    OP

    Just pay the TV license like all the great lads here have said.

    Be a good boy and give the goverment your money, they need it badly to waste on **** and we must be good little boys.

    I'm done here.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,991 ✭✭✭mathepac


    Squall19 wrote: »
    ... I'm done here.
    Thank Christ. I was about to ring the doc for Xanax (for both of us)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭not even wrong


    Cork24 wrote: »
    my tv can receive a signal but the house i live in does not have a signal to receive as their is no Sky box nor a Cable coming into the house as it was cut years ago.
    You still have a signal coming into your house


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,999 ✭✭✭Spipov


    sorry for dragging up an old thread.

    i dont have a tv, no aerial, no dish, no cable.

    i however have a monitor i bought a long time ago but that has tv capabilities, however, its only used as a monitor for work.

    do i need a tv licence?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,724 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    Spipov wrote: »
    sorry for dragging up an old thread.

    i dont have a tv, no aerial, no dish, no cable.

    i however have a monitor i bought a long time ago but that has tv capabilities, however, its only used as a monitor for work.

    do i need a tv licence?

    In theory yes. It's like having a gun with no shells, you'd still need a licence for the gun.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,999 ✭✭✭Spipov


    thanks very much, there goes 160.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    Spipov wrote: »
    thanks very much, there goes 160.

    Buy a monitor without tv capabilities instead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 565 ✭✭✭Mark#1


    Sorry to drag up an old thread again...

    Recently moved into my own place. The TV I have was bought in NI, before Ireland switched to digital broadcasting. My TV's tuner can't receive Ireland's digital broadcasts. I have no TV receiver - no Sky, no UPC, no Freesat or any variant of terrestrial or satellite box; nor do I have broadband - I effectively have no means of receiving TV broadcast, nor streaming or downoading content.

    Already started saving the stamps for the licence, but it seems bogus to me that my circumstances should necessitate a TV licence? Where do I stand?

    Thanks for any replies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭iainBB


    We got the largest monitors we could and also got a projector for movie night .

    When the TV Licence harassment started I told him that

    "We have a computer Monitor and stream content from online. we do not have a TV and there for do not require a TV licence.
    we will pay the broadcasting scam licence when that is introduced but do not need a TV licence."

    That stopped the harassment for about a year, but they come back with other nonsense forms, they just don't believe that someone in this day and age can do without and idiot box and RTE, I ignore all communication from them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,934 ✭✭✭MarkAnthony


    Mark#1 wrote: »
    Sorry to drag up an old thread again...

    Recently moved into my own place. The TV I have was bought in NI, before Ireland switched to digital broadcasting. My TV's tuner can't receive Ireland's digital broadcasts. I have no TV receiver - no Sky, no UPC, no Freesat or any variant of terrestrial or satellite box; nor do I have broadband - I effectively have no means of receiving TV broadcast, nor streaming or downoading content.

    Already started saving the stamps for the licence, but it seems bogus to me that my circumstances should necessitate a TV licence? Where do I stand?

    Thanks for any replies.

    You still need a licence. You're welcome to challenge it in court, if you do and are sucessful please let us all know.
    iainBB wrote: »
    We got the largest monitors we could and also got a projector for movie night .

    When the TV Licence harassment started I told him that

    "We have a computer Monitor and stream content from online. we do not have a TV and there for do not require a TV licence.
    we will pay the broadcasting scam licence when that is introduced but do not need a TV licence."

    That stopped the harassment for about a year, but they come back with other nonsense forms, they just don't believe that someone in this day and age can do without and idiot box and RTE, I ignore all communication from them.

    It's someone doing their job, I told them the same in polite manner even invited him in for a cuppa, never heard from them again. I do wish people would learn a bit of civility goes a long way.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭iainBB




    It's someone doing their job, I told them the same in polite manner even invited him in for a cuppa, never heard from them again. I do wish people would learn a bit of civility goes a long way.

    just because they JOB is to call at homes that do not have TV licence over and over, asking details. sending many different letters with threatening language and legislation, faking/imitate court letters with stating illegal suggestive behavior over and over again.
    That is harassment.

    I was polite the first 4 times. that quickly ran out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,381 ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    iainBB wrote: »
    just because they JOB is to call at homes that do not have TV licence over and over, asking details. sending many different letters with threatening language and legislation, faking/imitate court letters with stating illegal suggestive behavior over and over again.
    That is harassment.

    If you believe what they are doing is illegal, please consult a solicitor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭iainBB


    Paulw wrote: »
    If you believe what they are doing is illegal, please consult a solicitor.

    I did not say it was illegal, I am sure they are will with in their rights to bully my family and me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,381 ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    iainBB wrote: »
    I did not say it was illegal, I am sure they are will with in their rights to bully my family and me.

    errrr ....
    iainBB wrote: »
    faking/imitate court letters with stating illegal suggestive behavior over and over again.

    You did say "illegal"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭iainBB


    Paulw wrote: »
    errrr ....



    You did say "illegal"

    I did say the word "illegal", yes that is true

    i said it in the context of they harassment letters read about illegal behavior that not have a TV licence is illegal and fine up to ... for not having one and all TV should be licence and bla bla.
    and 30 days in jail for anyone bla bla.

    But I did not say their behavior was, there is a difference


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 565 ✭✭✭Mark#1


    Not getting involved in other folk's stuff.

    For my part, I had the TV licence guy visit - brought him in to see my TV, had a chat, he asked a few questions and gave me some time to come up with the fee. All pleasant & cordial. And as I said I'm saving the licence stamps.

    Always paid my TV licence in my last home - I did have terrestrial & satellite receivers and broadband, so I accepted that the licence was appropriate.

    But it still seems bogus to me that a licence is required for someone with:
    • No means to receive terrestrial TV broadcasts
    • No means to receive satellite TV broadcasts
    • No means to stream online content
    • No means to download online content
    I can watch DVDs or play video games - that's it.

    Bogus, bogus, bogus...

    I understand that the state will always do what it can get away with to maximise what it can take from The People (gotta fund those pensions somehow...), but I'm not sure how any reasoning person can disagree that the current TV licencing mechanism is bogus, or at least flawed.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,934 ✭✭✭MarkAnthony


    iainBB wrote: »
    just because they JOB is to call at homes that do not have TV licence over and over, asking details. sending many different letters with threatening language and legislation, faking/imitate court letters with stating illegal suggestive behavior over and over again.
    That is harassment.

    I was polite the first 4 times. that quickly ran out.

    Eh, is this in Ireland? It's a standard letter that gets sent a few times from An post, you do the declaration thinggy and it stops coming.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    Mark#1 wrote: »
    Not getting involved in other folk's stuff.

    For my part, I had the TV licence guy visit - brought him in to see my TV, had a chat, he asked a few questions and gave me some time to come up with the fee. All pleasant & cordial. And as I said I'm saving the licence stamps.

    Always paid my TV licence in my last home - I did have terrestrial & satellite receivers and broadband, so I accepted that the licence was appropriate.

    But it still seems bogus to me that a licence is required for someone with:
      [*]No means to receive terrestrial TV broadcasts
      [*]No means to receive satellite TV broadcasts
      [*]No means to stream online content
      [*]No means to download online content

      I can watch DVDs or play video games - that's it.

      Bogus, bogus, bogus...

      I understand that the state will always do what it can get away with to maximise what it can take from The People (gotta fund those pensions somehow...), but I'm not sure how any reasoning person can disagree that the current TV licencing mechanism is bogus, or at least flawed.

      Rabbit ears will get you irish channels, depending on the area even a coathanger will. The current licensing model is brilliant in its simplicity/stupidity.


    • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,934 ✭✭✭MarkAnthony


      Mark#1 wrote: »
      • No means to stream online content
      • No means to download online content
      I can watch DVDs or play video games - that's it.

      Bogus, bogus, bogus...

      I understand that the state will always do what it can get away with to maximise what it can take from The People (gotta fund those pensions somehow...), but I'm not sure how any reasoning person can disagree that the current TV licencing mechanism is bogus, or at least flawed.

      The above do not require a TV licence. The licence is for the tuner. It's outdate legislation and needs an update but when it does it will be MORE encompassing not less.

      The solution is to buy a monitor rather than a TV.


    • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,268 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


      Can we put a global ban on ALL TV Licence posts please ?

      They've been done to death. They are almost as bad as threads discussing Joan Burtons voice :)


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,170 ✭✭✭✭ED E


      What should have happened by now is the TV licence being scrapped for a universal "Arts Tax" that hits anyone that reaches the minimum threshold to pay income tax and is deducted at source. Job done, no paying inspectors.

      But that would probably be political suicide, only those on the scratcher would support it.


    • Advertisement
    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭mvt


      Had a TV inspector knock on the door just last week(live in an apt),first time in eleven years.
      I've never owned a TV & had send in the declaration the first time I received one,maybe six months after I moved in.
      The guy was very pleasant, said their records were out of date & said he would sort it out & there was no need for him to come in to check.
      He also said he found that a lot of folk don't have a TV these days.
      I suppose, like anything its a situation that can be as good or bad as you make it yourself.


    • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,934 ✭✭✭MarkAnthony


      Can we put a global ban on ALL TV Licence posts please ?

      They've been done to death. They are almost as bad as threads discussing Joan Burtons voice :)

      At least a mega thread and one for "I've more money than sense and think boards is a good place to do my reasearch on major financial decisions like buying an apartment and becomeing a landlord".

      That title might need work.


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,323 ✭✭✭davo2001


      Cork24 wrote: »
      I have a TV

      So you need a TV licence! How are you unclear on this?


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,381 ✭✭✭✭Paulw


      Mod note: The TV license is not all that complex.

      TV License information - http://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/consumer_affairs/media/tv_licences.html

      If you want to discuss the legality of it all, you can go to the Legal Discussion area of boards.ie
      If you disagree with how the law is, or want to share views on how it should be or how it could be changed, then there is a Politics section on boards.ie too.


    • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 32,286 Mod ✭✭✭✭The_Conductor


      Rabbit ears will get you irish channels, depending on the area even a coathanger will. The current licensing model is brilliant in its simplicity/stupidity.

      Not entirely true- RTE Networks advise almost 7% of the area of the country- including some parts of Dublin- but mostly remote/mountainous areas- are incapable of receiving a terrestrial signal. Even some relatively urban areas- such as West Dublin/North Kildare- need large external antennas to pick up Kippure- and local authorities have been vigorously chasing those with such antennas. In Lucan village- there are installers doing flying trade installing Saorsat receivers for those who don't want to pay UPC or Sky for the privilege of watching RTE (ontop of the fee).

      The TV licence is a locational licence to possess equipment capable of displaying a TV signal in a property. The lack of a signal is immaterial.

      There are plans to merge TV licences into the Property tax- to ease the costs associated with collection/enforcement- and the Minister has stated in the Dáil that all habitable properties should be considered liable.......... Given the Revenue Commissioners collect the Property Tax- I wish anyone who is inclined to dispute the tax the very best of good luck.


    This discussion has been closed.
    Advertisement