Transfer mapping

mickdw

I have a land transfer map to do.

Basically plot at road is being sold with lands to rear being retained. There is to be a right of way through the plot being sold to access the lands to rear. There is also a wayleave wanted to allow services come through this plot.

How should I mark the wayleave and how much detail is needed. The right of way will be highlighted yellow and marked A to B. Wayleave for water & power required.

muffler

Mark with a blue line (biro) and refer to as "x" - "y".

You can write something like "wayleave in respect of water and power in favour of ??? shown by blue line "x" - "y"

Depending on the scale a single blue line will do but if its on 1:1000 mark 2 separate blue lines.

Just on the off chance that the wayleave is located within the r.o.w. just mark the blue line(s) first and then colour in either side for the r.o.w.

mickdw

muffler wrote: »

Mark with a blue line (biro) and refer to as "x" - "y".

You can write something like "wayleave in respect of water and power in favour of ??? shown by blue line "x" - "y"

Depending on the scale a single blue line will do but if its on 1:1000 mark 2 separate blue lines.

Just on the off chance that the wayleave is located within the r.o.w. just mark the blue line(s) first and then colour in either side for the r.o.w.

Ya wayleave will be through the right of way.
Both right of way and wayleave will be leading to the public road. Solicitor is asking to show water main but I think once its passing the gate and in the public road, I don't think its exact location is too important for this exercise.

archtech

Make sure the wayleave allows for both installation and maintenance of the services, an easement is a better legal term. Have come across cases in the past where the wayleave wasn't of any value to the party it was granted to.

mickdw

archtech wrote: »

Make sure the wayleave allows for both installation and maintenance of the services, an easement is a better legal term. Have come across cases in the past where the wayleave wasn't of any value to the party it was granted to.

Solicitor thats requesting wayleave so I don't wish to get involved in that.

muffler

mickdw wrote: »

Ya wayleave will be through the right of way.
Both right of way and wayleave will be leading to the public road. Solicitor is asking to show water main but I think once its passing the gate and in the public road, I don't think its exact location is too important for this exercise.

If the water main is on the public road then there is no need to extend the line beyond the site boundary. However it is important to ensure the road is public.

I have never marked maps in the way the solicitor is referring to but if they insist then maybe add "z" to the equation with x being the point of connection to water main, y being the site boundary and z being the other end/rear of site adjacent to fields referred to.

archtech has raised a valid enough point but any text on your map will need to correspond with the legal docs prepared by the solicitor. If in doubt just simply insert "water main denoted by blue line x - y/z"

No6

In relation to the wayleave for the water make sure the pipe is where you have been told. I am involved in a big scheme and the pipes are never where they are shown on any drawings!! so you could end up with a wayleave and no pipe or a pipe in a different part of the plot and no wayleave!!!:eek:

muffler

muffler wrote: »

If in doubt just simply insert "water main denoted by blue line x - y/z"

Sorry, that should have read....If in doubt just simply insert "domestic water pipe denoted by blue line x - y/z"