Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Are there any movies that satisfy this rule

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,464 ✭✭✭e_e




  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,529 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo



    I'm pretty sure the 2 female characters in Alien talked to each other about at least one of the several male characters in it at some point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,074 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    Thelma and Louise? The titular ladies do, at times, talk about more serious matters than Brad Pitt's Abs.

    Miss Congeniality II has the two leads discussing the case they're trying to solve: the kidnapping of a woman (Miss United States).

    I see the point, though: most films seem to be about men making a mess, and if there are women around, they're the ones who have to clean up the mess afterwards. :o

    You are the type of what the age is searching for, and what it is afraid it has found. I am so glad that you have never done anything, never carved a statue, or painted a picture, or produced anything outside of yourself! Life has been your art. You have set yourself to music. Your days are your sonnets.

    ―Oscar Wilde predicting Social Media, in The Picture of Dorian Gray



  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,529 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    bnt wrote: »

    I see the point, though: most films seem to be about men making a mess, and if there are women around, they're the ones who have to clean up the mess afterwards. :o

    Am I the only one who spotted that the two characters in the comic appear to be a lesbian couple? :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    ironically, Sucker Punch does, which must enrage feminists like there's no tomorrow :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,529 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    krudler wrote: »
    ironically, Sucker Punch does, which must enrage feminists like there's no tomorrow :pac:

    Thank you krudler, I finally understand what the point of that awful film was now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,464 ✭✭✭e_e


    I imagine most, if not all Studio Ghibli movies count.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,553 ✭✭✭✭Dempsey


    Sunshine meets the criteria, I know this because the scenes involving the love story between Capa and Cassie were removed from the the final cut! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    Mickeroo wrote: »
    Thank you krudler, I finally understand what the point of that awful film was now.

    Synder is a genius in that respect, to make one of the most mysoginistic yet feminist friendly movies ever, they'll debate it in future film schools :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,074 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    Mickeroo wrote: »
    Am I the only one who spotted that the two characters in the comic appear to be a lesbian couple? :o
    I saw that too, not sure what that has to do with what I said. They're not in a movie, after all... not unless the movie is Bound, a movie I could not watch all they way through, but which might fit the bill. :rolleyes:

    You are the type of what the age is searching for, and what it is afraid it has found. I am so glad that you have never done anything, never carved a statue, or painted a picture, or produced anything outside of yourself! Life has been your art. You have set yourself to music. Your days are your sonnets.

    ―Oscar Wilde predicting Social Media, in The Picture of Dorian Gray



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,529 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    bnt wrote: »
    I saw that too, not sure what that has to do with what I said. They're not in a movie, after all... not unless the movie is Bound, a movie I could not watch all they way through, but which might fit the bill. :rolleyes:

    I guess I was trying to imply the comic was some sort of feminist anti-male propaganda :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 485 ✭✭Boo Radley


    Mickeroo wrote: »
    I guess I was trying to imply the comic was some sort of feminist anti-male propaganda :D

    You might just be right. There was a certain tone of casual misandry about that cartoon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Dotrel


    Bound.

    They mainly talk about money and finger-food.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,013 ✭✭✭✭jaykhunter


    Back to the Future II, these cops talk about 1985 Lorraine ;)

    bttf2_Future_Police.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,080 ✭✭✭✭Tusky


    Theres, eh, millions of them. Retarded 'rule'.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,783 ✭✭✭Hank_Jones


    There was actually a study done on this and some guy made up a name for it, can't feckin remember.

    Anyway, a film that passes the rule is Sunshine Cleaning.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 322 ✭✭Apolloyon


    It's called The Bechdel Test. With so many different movie genres. I'd say there are quite a number of movies which pass the test. Some genres would be worse off than others. For instance most Hollywood style romantic comedies would be an automatic fail. As would any action movie with a shoehorned in romance.

    Good science fiction movies are on the fence. They often feature well defined female characters but apparently they're only allowed one per movie :rolleyes:. Although 'Alien' was mentioned in link in the OP. The fact was each character was written to be either male or female and they had set idea in mind until after casting. However overall, I think movies (in general) hold up well. It is unfortunately most tv shows that fail this test so frequently but alas that would be a completely different thread!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 413 ✭✭Seans_Username


    There's thousands of films which don't satisfy this rule, it's better to find films that don't satisfy it!
    Apolloyon wrote: »
    It's called The Bechdel Test

    Found this on stumble upon last week: http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/10-famous-films-that-surprisingly-fail-the-bechdel-test.php
    Pretty interesting stuff :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,013 ✭✭✭✭jaykhunter


    i bet the resi films all satisfy this rule :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,900 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    Mickeroo wrote: »
    I'm pretty sure the 2 female characters in Alien talked to each other about at least one of the several male characters in it at some point.
    So?
    The rule is that they have to talk about something other than a man, not that they can't ever talk about a man.
    Rom Coms are out because the main focus is women vrs men. But msot other films appear to satisfy it.
    Mickeroo wrote: »
    Am I the only one who spotted that the two characters in the comic appear to be a lesbian couple? :o
    Yes, that's actually the whole point of the "Rule".
    The name of the comicstrip is "Dykes to Watch Out For"
    Apolloyon wrote: »
    It's called The Bechdel Test.
    Which was named after the above comic, it was drawn by Alison Bechdel.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭Goldstein


    biko wrote: »

    Playing Devil's advocate she could apply the exact same logic substituting two women for:
    • Two people over 50 talking about something that doesn't involve talking about people under 50, for more than one minute.

    • Two black people talking about something that doesn't involve talking about non-black people, for more than one minute.

    • Two ugly people talking about something that doesn't involve pretty people, for more than one minute.

    • Two non-US people talking about something that doesn't involve US people, for more than one minute.

    • Two overweight people talking about something that doesn't involve thin people, for more than one minute.

    • Two bald people talking about something that doesn't involve people with hair, for more than one minute.
    ad infinitum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    Did you watch the full video?

    She does bring up black people, and maybe for you but I don't have an issue with there being not enough ugly/bald/old people in movies.
    I do have an issue with there not being enough interesting female characters though.

    Watch from 07.40 on... or 08.10...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭Goldstein


    biko wrote: »
    Did you watch the full video?

    She does bring up black people, and maybe for you but I don't have an issue with there being not enough ugly/bald/old people in movies.
    I do have an issue with there not being enough interesting female characters though.

    Watch from 07.40 on... or 08.10...

    Fair enough, replace black with say homosexual in my previous post. It's clearly true that there aren't enough female-centric movies but the test seems slightly flawed logically as the sexist angle can so easily be swapped with the ageist / homophobic / xenophobic / racist (And many others) angle using the exact same argument. Unfortunately, the majority of movies will tick most of those boxes when held to these same rules.

    I'm a strong believer that people should vote with their feet and when stronger female based movies come along, it would encourage more of the same the more financially successful they are. Obviously there are more systemic issues influencing what gets green lit and what doesn't but money is the be all and end all for them. Hollywood's a cynical place though - who knows what motivates them financially or the reasons behind the imbalance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭Kooli


    Goldstein wrote: »
    Fair enough, replace black with say homosexual in my previous post. It's clearly true that there aren't enough female-centric movies but the test seems slightly flawed logically as the sexist angle can so easily be swapped with the ageist / homophobic / xenophobic / racist (And many others) angle using the exact same argument. Unfortunately, the majority of movies will tick most of those boxes when held to these same rules.

    That's not a logical flaw. It's not the same to replace with homosexual, because 50% of the population are not homosexual, so it would be weird if they were equally represented.

    As for racist, yes an equivalent point can be made, and she makes the point in the video.

    But what does it matter? If there is an issue that the vast majority of movies tell the stories of men, and that well developed female characters are a rarity, it doesn't take away from that point at all to point out other underrepresented groups.

    And for those of you who say that most movies pass the test, or that MILLIONS of movies pass the test, that's just frankly not true!! It's actually hard to name movies that pass, even movies with a woman as the central character because she doesn't actually speak to other women.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭Kooli


    Goldstein wrote: »

    I'm a strong believer that people should vote with their feet and when stronger female based movies come along, it would encourage more of the same the more financially successful they are. Obviously there are more systemic issues influencing what gets green lit and what doesn't but money is the be all and end all for them. Hollywood's a cynical place though - who knows what motivates them financially or the reasons behind the imbalance.

    The systemic issues are pretty significant.

    If anyone wonders what the make-up of the oscar voters is:

    94% white
    77% male
    2% black
    Less than 2% Latino
    14% people under 50
    Median age is 62


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭Goldstein


    Kooli wrote: »
    That's not a logical flaw. It's not the same to replace with homosexual, because 50% of the population are not homosexual, so it would be weird if they were equally represented.

    Yes, you beat me to it - I came back to concede the point as that is the critical difference - females are not a minority. It is hard to see why it is so lobsided though - or why there are far more big name male directors in Hollywood for instance. Or more big name screenwriters. It would be interesting to see if things shift outside of mainstream Hollywood films or if patterns have shifted through time. I'm sure the same observation would hold but it would be interesting to see the correlation when you compare IMDb, top grossing US films, top grossing non-US films, the winners of the various high profile film festivals etc.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,014 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    As a test of perceived institutional and mainstream bias, it's something perhaps worthy of a bit of thought. But applied to cinema as a 'whole', it kind of falls apart. Martha Marcy..., Margaret, Meek's Cutoff, Guilty of Romance (well, that one's a complex argument ;)) Confessions, Poetry, A Separation: all among the last twelve month's most brilliant films, and all featuring strong female leads placed in unusual and well-considered circumstances.

    It's an interesting argument on one hand, certainly when applied to consensus Hollywood opinion. But there are still tonnes of great roles for women - you just, like always, have to step outside the box to experience.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    Indeed, and if people watch off-broadway stuff they'll find many many great films.
    However, looking at the cinema menus they show mostly blockbuster movies from the states (that will maximise profit) and in these films women tend to be props rather than main characters, much like the token black guy.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭Kooli


    As a test of perceived institutional and mainstream bias, it's something perhaps worthy of a bit of thought. But applied to cinema as a 'whole', it kind of falls apart. Martha Marcy..., Margaret, Meek's Cutoff, Guilty of Romance (well, that one's a complex argument ;)) Confessions, Poetry, A Separation: all among the last twelve month's most brilliant films, and all featuring strong female leads placed in unusual and well-considered circumstances.

    It's an interesting argument on one hand, certainly when applied to consensus Hollywood opinion. But there are still tonnes of great roles for women - you just, like always, have to step outside the box to experience.

    Yes outside the mainstream it's definitely better. But just because you could name a few doesn't mean that it's not a problem, because no one is saying that NO movies pass the test. I'd say even if you looked at the movies in the IFI or the Screen (usually better than what you'd find in the the multiplexes) for the past 6 months, the films that pass would be a minority.

    And remember that if you're thinking that for movies to have a fair representation of women, then about half the movies out there should pass the test, then you're misunderstanding the test. The test is for the MINIMUM meaningful presence of female characters, so ideally more than half should pass or even the majority (although no one's saying all movies should pass because a lot of movies wouldn't logically focus on any women).

    If you're a guy, can you even imagine what it would like if things were the other way around? If there was a test about whether a movie had two male characters who talk to each other about something other than a woman, and most movies failed it? If it was actually hard to come up with a list of movies with developed male characters? If you looked at lists of the top grossing movies, top rated movies, most popular movies, most awarded movies and most of them failed the test?? Can't you see how weird that would be??


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,731 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Just looking at (for argument's sake) the top rated films on IMDB and there's an undeniable focus on testosterone. Even those films with a significant female character, such as Alien, involve a lot of sweating and ass-kicking.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,014 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Kooli wrote: »
    Yes outside the mainstream it's definitely better. But just because you could name a few doesn't mean that it's not a problem, because no one is saying that NO movies pass the test. I'd say even if you looked at the movies in the IFI or the Screen (usually better than what you'd find in the the multiplexes) for the past 6 months, the films that pass would be a minority.

    I'm not denying that Hollywood has it completely askew, but it is often a male-dominated profession for various out-dated reasons. And compared to other artforms - music especially - it's certainly lobsided.

    I don't think it's entirely fair to have the conversation without flagging that there are loads of films out there that easily 'pass' the test - I just picked a handful of recent ones to counter the video above (and the old-fashioned farce that is the American Academy will never constitute a fair representation). But yes, there's certainly a worrying aspect when it comes to 'mainstream' cinema and popular opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭Kooli


    Looking at the website bechdeltest.com, it seems about half the movies in 2011 pass the test.
    And remember, passing doesn't have to mean much. Drive 'passes' on the following basis:
    There's a short part in one scene where Irene and Cindy (the babysitter) greet each other ("Hi"/"How are you?"/"Fine"). It's the only scene in the movie where two female characters talk to each other at all.

    And there are plenty of both mainstream movies that pass and arthouse movies that fail, so it's not just an issue with big Hollywood.


Advertisement