Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

SSD's choice!!

  • 05-10-2011 7:11am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭


    Ok a little bit ago I posted an idea about replacing my HDD with and SSD.. Now I have a question about which SSD to buy..

    I was looking at the OCZ vertex 3 and agility 3 models.. My only problem is my chipset only supports SATA 3gb/s while both of these drives are SATA 6gb/s compatible. I know they will both work however will I see much of a performance difference say over a vertex 2 or agility 2 drive considering the bottleneck of the vertex 3 or agility 3 being connected to the SATA 3gb/s controller..As the vertex 2 and agility 2 are a good bit cheaper..

    Also I can't seem to find benchmark results for the vertex 3 and agility 3 conneced to a SATA 3gb/s controller..I know connected to a SATA 6gb/s controller the vertex 3 Shows much better performance than the agility 3 but on the SATA 3gb/s controller would you see the same superior performance from the vertex 3??

    I don't want to spend extra cash for little or no performance benfit


Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 10,088 Mod ✭✭✭✭marco_polo


    Short answer is that if there is a decent price gap between the two, its is not really worth it, as the vertex 3 abolutely trounces itself when on a SATA 3 controller :p.

    I had a slightly longer post written but then then I found this review instead, it has benchmarks of the Crucial c300 and Vertex 3 SSD running on Sata 2 and Sata 3 controllers.

    http://www.storagereview.com/ocz_vertex_3_review_240gb

    By virture of being a newer design the Vertex 3 would probably slightly more effiicent than a vertex 2 for certain operations (random 4k read writes/writes etc) that are not bottlenecked by SATA 2 speeds, but for bandwith critical operations like large sequential read/writes being on a SATA 2 controller would almost completely wipe out any performance gains.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭U_Fig


    marco_polo wrote: »
    Short answer is that if there is a decent price gap between the two, its is not really worth it, as the vertex 3 abolutely trounces itself when on a SATA 3 controller :p.

    I had a slightly longer post written but then then I found this review instead, it has benchmarks of the Crucial c300 and Vertex 3 SSD running on Sata 2 and Sata 3 controllers.

    http://www.storagereview.com/ocz_vertex_3_review_240gb

    By virture of being a newer design the Vertex 3 would probably slightly more effiicent than a vertex 2 for certain operations (random 4k read writes/writes etc) that are not bottlenecked by SATA 2 speeds, but for bandwith critical operations like large sequential read/writes being on a SATA 2 controller would almost completely wipe out any performance gains.

    thanks i decided to go for the agility 3 i found some benchmarks for it and really on a SATA 3Gb/s controller the extra performance of the vertex 3 is not really seen so no point in spending like and extra 40 - 50 euro on it cheers


Advertisement