Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Volkswagen Eos 1.4 Petrol - To buy or not to buy?!

  • 28-09-2011 12:05pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32


    I'm considering buying a Volkswagen Eos but wondering do any of you drive one and if so, what do you think of it.
    In the past i have driven a 1.6 Renault Megane convertible (petrol) and whilst i loved it, it bugged me that you can only have the roof either all up or all down.
    With the EOS, you have the advantage of still having a 'Sunroof' for the days when the convertible isn't in use (which is pretty much everyday in our sunny climate!).
    I would prefer to go for a diesel option, but the Eos only comes in a 2lt diesel, which, as i only really use the car at the weekends, i don't see the point in buying a car with that big an engine.
    What is the 1.4lt petrol like on fuel economy etc? I know the road tax is €302 a year (which i'm ok with), but really it's down to the day to day running costs that will sway my decision.

    Appreciate any feedback


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭Matt Simis


    Given the weight of the body I would say its extremely slow and tedious to drive. Didnt they have 1.6 and 2.0 FSI engines in it too? 1.4 is just too small..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,712 ✭✭✭✭R.O.R


    Matt Simis wrote: »
    Given the weight of the body I would say its extremely slow and tedious to drive. Didnt they have 1.6 and 2.0 FSI engines in it too? 1.4 is just too small..

    I think it's the 1.4T - 122bhp engine that's in the EOS, or at least it was in the one I delivered to someone in 2008.

    Despite it's small size, it's a very nippy engine and is generally well regarded by the owners. Not sure on fuel consumption, but I think it's fairly reasonable in the Golf. Probably suffers a bit in the EOS with the heavier body.

    Looking at the history of the one EOS 1.4T we have on fleet, it's just had it's second service at 29,000km and a faulty window regulator was replaced at the same time. Whether that's a problem on all of them, I don't know as one car isn't a great indicator.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭Matt Simis


    Ah right, didnt know it was the "super" 1.4 engine:
    http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/car-reviews/car-and-driving/volkswagen-eos-1.4-tsi-1005836.html

    Dunno if I buy into the mega boosted tiny CC engines idea myself, its not a great design by itself, its a tax efficient design.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,712 ✭✭✭✭R.O.R


    Matt Simis wrote: »
    Ah right, didnt know it was the "super" 1.4 engine:
    http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/car-reviews/car-and-driving/volkswagen-eos-1.4-tsi-1005836.html

    Dunno if I buy into the mega boosted tiny CC engines idea myself, its not a great design by itself, its a tax efficient design.

    An even more boosted 1.4 is about to be unleashed in Ireland, in a fairly large Family saloon, but this is getting way O/T now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32 GingerG


    Thanks everyone.
    Yes, it's the 1.4T 122Bhp that I was considering. Naturally the garage are dining it's praises but I expect that.
    The Renault megane 1.5 diesel is well spec'd but without the option of the sunroof I would rather not go there. And generally I don't want to go higher than a 1.6 (regardless of fuel type) as I don't do huge mileage.
    My alternative to the Eos is a stylish coupe with sunroof (again no higher than 1.6).

    Going to test drive the Eos on Sat so will see how it goes.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,520 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    I drove one when they came out, not too keen on them, I like the roof but they always make me think of divorced 50 something blonde with sunglasses

    I don't get the engine size thing, is it for insurance?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32 GingerG


    Thanks Colm.
    I was really looking at the 1.4 because of tax and running costs. I don't use a car for work but do want to buy something nice (preference is convertible or then a coupe with sunroof)
    The garage have told me that the 1.4T is 'better' than the 1.6lt. But as I say, I would expect them to say that!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 499 ✭✭heate


    Not doing much milage - then buy it! I wouldn't say the engine is over boosted the French were churning out 99hp 1.4's an extra 22hp with direct injection and a little turbo isn't exactly over the top its probably adding the guts of 20 odd hp to the mix.
    The car itself - is good looking and has a nice interior. As for the 1.5dci Megane - ugh a bit drab - and if you're not doing any mileage don't bother with a diesel - no fun and can end u being a headache.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,363 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    The Eos is basically a Passat underneath the fancy frock and also uses trim from the Mk V Golf and Jetta. 1.4 TSi 122bhp engine is used through out the VAG range and hasn't any major problems so far. If you are not doing big mileage then it makes more sense over the diesel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32 GingerG


    Thanks guys
    Will definitely have a serious look at it on Sat.
    And if I do buy I promise not to look like a 50 year old Blonde divorcee when driving it!! (more a single red head!!) :)
    Thanks again, really appreciate the feedback.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 499 ✭✭heate


    how much is being asked for it? Has it got a leather interior?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,035 ✭✭✭✭-Chris-


    The 1.4T engine is better than the 1.6 imho.

    Make sure to get them to throw in an umbrella with the deal - the Eos leaks like a sieve.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,520 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    What sort of money are you spending?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    GingerG wrote: »
    Thanks Colm.
    I was really looking at the 1.4 because of tax and running costs.

    Tax is no longer based on capacity since 08, and running costs never were. I think that 1.4 motor is 159g CO2, so €447 a year. The 2.0 TDi is maybe a band lower, at €302, and a Bluemotion one is €156.

    Worrying about an extra hundred or two in tax is a waste, though, since there's €100 sloshing around in the fuel tank, and it'll drop €100 in depreciation every 10 days. Motor tax is chicken feed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,712 ✭✭✭✭R.O.R


    Tax is no longer based on capacity since 08, and running costs never were. I think that 1.4 motor is 159g CO2, so €447 a year. The 2.0 TDi is maybe a band lower, at €302, and a Bluemotion one is €156.

    Worrying about an extra hundred or two in tax is a waste, though, since there's €100 sloshing around in the fuel tank, and it'll drop €100 in depreciation every 10 days. Motor tax is chicken feed.

    If it's an early enough 2008 model (pre 1st July) then it can still be taxed on engine size.


Advertisement