Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

New Devonian predatory fish

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    The skull actually looks like it's laughing! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,551 ✭✭✭Rubecula


    Probably being told fishy jokes does that to it.

    Interesting looking creature isn't it. I like the way it is pictured in shallow water too. Do we know if that was in fact how it lived?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    According to Wiki it was first described in 1941. I'm guessing from fragmentary remains.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laccognathus


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Rubecula wrote: »
    Probably being told fishy jokes does that to it.

    Interesting looking creature isn't it. I like the way it is pictured in shallow water too. Do we know if that was in fact how it lived?

    It makes sense- Tiktaalik was found in the same site, and it was probably not living in deep water.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4 SvenLittkowski


    I would like to know more, like who found the fossils, where exactly, and what the exact age of the fossil is.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 128 ✭✭Allosaur


    Rubecula wrote: »
    Probably being told fishy jokes does that to it.

    Interesting looking creature isn't it. I like the way it is pictured in shallow water too. Do we know if that was in fact how it lived?
    I'd imagine that it filled a similar niche as the modern Catfish. Slow moving rivers, lakes and ponds. Still, dark shallow. That kind of thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    I would like to know more, like who found the fossils, where exactly, and what the exact age of the fossil is.

    Apparently a different species of Laccognathus has been known since 1941. More information below:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laccognathus


Advertisement