Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Prosecuting Co-Accuseds

  • 31-08-2011 5:25pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 254 ✭✭


    a few questions here for the more informed posters regarding co-accuseds. a previous thread touched on this topic but didn't really go indepth..

    can co-accuseds, if willing, be called as state witnesses during their own criminal trials, to give evidence implicating each other, if they made such admissions during earlier garda questioning?

    is it a case where the trial judge must simply charge the jury beforehand to be cautious when taking into account a co-accuseds evidence in this respect?

    if it's forseeable by the gardai, during the investigation stage, that the evidence of an 'accomplice' would be necessary to secure convictions against remaining co-accuseds at a future trial, would they be instead granted immunity, if willing, on condition that they give evidence for the State (applicable only in the more serious criminal cases of course)? For example, the recent murder case where the State's case was based largely on the evidence of one protected witness ie: the getaway driver in a murder.

    what is essentially the limitation on the significance of admissions made by a suspect in custody in identifying & implicating accomplices in a crime. is it a case where gardai can only really use these admissions to establish reasonable cause to then arrest & detain the named accomplices on suspicion of the same crime? does it aid the preliminary investigation moreso than provide a prima-facia case for trial?

    i'm aware of the judges rules regarding best practice for the taking of statements from co-suspects during garda investigations, but cannot locate relevant case law regarding the prosecution of such cases.

    duplicate, sorry!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭Mr Jinx


    can co-accuseds, if willing, be called as state witnesses during their own criminal trials, to give evidence implicating each other, if they made such admissions during earlier garda questioning?

    is it a case where the trial judge must simply charge the jury beforehand to be cautious when taking into account a co-accuseds evidence in this respect?

    i'm aware of the judges rules regarding best practice for the taking of statements from co-accuseds during garda investigations, but cannot locate relevant case law regarding the prosecution of such cases.

    The state cannot call defendants to give evidence, the can only cross examine them if their own defence choose to put them on the stand.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 254 ✭✭theAwakening


    please see other thread guys sorry


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,550 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    As Mr. Jinx says.

    Ag v Joyce [1929] ir 526 and the 1924 criminal evidence act if you want some Casey stuff


Advertisement