Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

House for sale with Occupancy Clause

  • 29-08-2011 8:30pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12


    Hello All,

    Been looking at buying a house in co. Meath. Came across a house that seem good value (this will not be a discussion on price) but turns out that the existing owners planning approval contained an occupancy clause.

    Been told by the auctioneer that there is no issue with these clauses since the down turn and the council will overturn this clause once owner has a valid reason to sell. According to auctioneers explanation of the reasons for sale I would expect this to be treated as a valid reason (I’m not going to air someone else laundry in public).

    I'm still looking at other properties and talking to other auctioneers and some aren't so confident on the ability to overturn the occupancy clause.
    I'm worried about chasing a lost cause (or clause!!) and wondering has anybody any experience of removing the clause to allow a house to be sold in Meath since the downturn??

    Thanks all in advance

    PS new to this and if i've posted in the wrong forum let me know a more relevant topic and I'll re-post


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,547 ✭✭✭✭Poor Uncle Tom


    the Condition canot be removed but the planning department can give a letter stating that they will not enforce that particular condition.

    It is up to the sellers to get that letter as the planners will not always give it, depending on the area the planning permission is in, the planners may only allow a sale to someone from the region.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,822 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    Actually, imho, that clause is un-enforceable. To wit: house owner falls into arrears, house repossessed, Bank owns house, and puts it on the market.

    Houses with this clause have changed hands with no issue in recent years in the West.

    I'm not even going to mention the unconstitutionality of it.............it's only a matter of time before the Silks get a Big Day out of this one.

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,547 ✭✭✭✭Poor Uncle Tom


    galwaytt wrote: »
    Actually, imho, that clause is un-enforceable.
    Although I agree with you, the condition is enough to stop anyone else getting a mortgage to purchase the property, so from that point it is effective and would need to be addressed before selling a property, if you want the broadest possible market.


Advertisement